Corporate social responsibilityEvolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678
• Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue De Gestion Des Ressources Humaines, 57(1), 18-41.
• Araque-Padilla, R., & Montero-Simó, M. (2006). La responsabilidad social de la empresa a debate.
• Argandoña, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9-10), 1093-1102. doi:10.1023/a:1006075517423
• Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2014). Who needs CSR? the impact of corporate social responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 349-364. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1633-2
• Bouquet, C., & Deutsch, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate social performance on a firm's multinationality. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 755-769. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9467-4
• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman,
• Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3-28. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030
• Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
• Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 107-125. doi:10.1002/smj.2089
• Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684
• Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295. doi:10.1177/000765039903800303
• Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
• Clark, J. M. (1926). The social control of business. Social Control of Business,
• Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
• Comisión Europea. (2011). Estrategia renovada de la UE para 2011–2014 sobre la responsabilidad social de las empresas. bruselas, 25 de octubre.
• Commission, E. (2001). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility,
• Committee for Economic Development. (1971). Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations,
• Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2009). The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 1-608) doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.001.0001
• Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2014). Por qué se institucionalizan las organizaciones. [Why companies go institutional] Revista Europea De Direccion y Economia De La Empresa, 23(1), 22-30. doi:10.1016/j.redee.2013.09.003
• Dacin, M. T. (1997). Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46-81. doi:10.2307/257020
• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13. doi:10.1002/csr.132
• Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.
• Davis, K. (1967). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle. Business Horizons, 10(4), 45-50. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(67)90007-9
• De La Luz Fernández-Alles, M., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2006). Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories: How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 503-517. doi:10.1108/09534810610676699
• De Neve, G. (2009). Power, inequality and corporate social responsibility: The politics of ethical compliance in the south indian garment industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 63-71.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, , 1-38.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
• Doh, J. P. (1999). Regional market integration and decentralization in europe and north america: Implications for business-government relations and corporate public affairs. Business and Society, 38(4), 474-507. doi:10.1177/000765039903800406
• Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in europe and the united states: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47-73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x
• Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2002). Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: Theory and implications. International Business Review, 11(6), 665-684. doi:10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00044-6
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
• Drucker, P. (1954). The Practice of Management,
• Escamilla Solano, S., Plaza Casado, P., & Flores Ureba, S. (2016). Analysis of the disclosure of information on corporate social responsibility in urban public transport companies in spain. [Análisis de la divulgación de la información sobre la responsabilidad social corporativa en las empresas de transporte público urbano en España] Revista De Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 19(2), 195-203. doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2015.05.002
• Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113-135. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4
• Fernández-Allés, M. (2001). Un análisis institucional del contexto y su incidencia en el proceso de cambio de la gestión de recursos humanos. tres estudios de casos.
• Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach,
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art (pp. 1-343) doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815768
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, (SEPTEMBER 13), 32-33.
• Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes - conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772-791. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
• Galbreath, J. (2010). How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? evidence from australia. European Business Review, 22(4), 411-431. doi:10.1108/09555341011056186
• Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
• Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53-73.
• Greenwood, M., & Anderson, E. (2009). 'I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder': Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 186-200. doi:10.1177/1038411109105441
• Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58-74. doi:10.1002/smj.801
• Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99. doi:10.2307/256876
• Keim, G. (2003). Nongovernmental organizations and business-government relations: The importance of institutions. Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Governments, and Society, , 19-34.
• Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.34422026
• Lee, M. -. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53-73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
• Lee, M. -. P. (2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 281-298. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0814-0
• Ley, A. J., & Wood, R. S. (2014). Teaching the new institutionalism: A cross-class simulation of executive branch decision-making and judicial review.
• Lindgreen, A., Maon, F., Reast, J., & Yani-de-Soriano, M. (2012). Guest editorial: Corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 393-395. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1488-y
• Lozano, J. M. (1999). Ética y empresa.
• Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28-54. doi:10.1111/joms.12124
• McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, , 41-62.
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. doi:10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105
• Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2010). Corporate environmental and financial performance: A multivariate approach. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(2), 193-210. doi:10.1108/02635571011020304
• Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910
• Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502+596+597+598. doi:10.5840/beq200313434
• Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). La creación de valor compartido. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 32-49.
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis,
• Samy, M., Odemilin, G., & Bampton, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: A strategy for sustainable business success. an analysis of 20 selected british companies. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 203-217. doi:10.1108/14720701011035710
• Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications, 15(1), 9-29. doi:10.1108/13563281011016813
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations,
• Sementelli, A. J. (2005). Critical theory, institutions, and hegemony: Role obligation and the reconciliation of seemingly incompatible goals. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behaviour, 8(4), 559-576.
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
• Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 95-105. doi:10.1023/A:1023331212247
• Verbeke, A., & Tung, V. (2013). The future of stakeholder management theory: A temporal perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 529-543. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1276-8
• Wallich, H. C., & McGowan, J. J. (1970). Stockholder interest and the corporation's role in social policy. A New Rationale for Corporate Social Policy, , 39-59.
• Walton, C. C. (1967). Corporate Social Responsibilities,
• Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization,