A New Leadership for a New Era

  1. Foncubierta-Rodríguez, María-José 1
  2. Ravina-Ripoll, Rafael 1
  3. Popescu, Cristina Raluca Gh. 2
  1. 1 University of Cádiz, Spain
  2. 2 University of Bucharest, Romania & The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
Libro:
Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability

ISSN: 2330-3271,  2330-328X

ISBN: 9781668451090

Año de publicación: 2022

Páginas: 1-35

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5109-0.CH001 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

Organizations face their work in a rapidly changing environment, where globalization, technological advances, and the generation, management, and transfer of knowledge have become fundamental processes for competitiveness. This VUCA environment forces entities to readjust continuously. This implies attracting and retaining people with adequate and sufficient skills to work in this context and committing to management models based on leadership that contributes, as never before, to giving visibility, voice, participation, and well-being to its members. In the conviction, demonstrated by recent literature, the most satisfied collaborators are the most productive. This study is of an empirical, exploratory, and transversal nature, in which, firstly, the degree of conformity with individual capacities of the new leader is tested among personnel managers in organizations in the Bay of Algeciras Arch. Secondly, it is analyzed whether these opinions are related to specific socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 10.1007/978-3-030-30549-9_1
  • 10.1108/ICT-10-2016-0068
  • Baker, D.; Greenberg, C. & Hemingway, C. (2007). Empresas Felices=Empresas Rentables. Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión 2000.
  • 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.029
  • 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.200
  • BaxterL. A.BabbieE. R. (2004). The basics of communication research. Thomson Learning.
  • BennettN.LemoineG. J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389563
  • 10.1111/sjpe.12211
  • 10.1002/ltl.20176
  • 10.1007/978-3-030-33578-6_3
  • 10.4018/978-1-7998-8482-8.ch017
  • BraidotN. (2014). Neuromanagement. The neuroscientific revolution in organisations, from management to neuromanagement. Granica.
  • 10.1007/s10551-011-1116-2
  • CieciuchJ. (2017a). Exploring the complicated relationship between values and behavior. In RoccasS.SagivL. (Eds.), Values and Behavior. Taking a Cross-Cultural Perspective (pp. 237–247). Springer International Publishing.
  • 10.1007/978-3-030-38463-0_10
  • Cobo RomaníC. (2010). New Literacies, Old Problems: The New World of Work and the Unfinished Business of Education. Reason and Word, 22(100), 577–588.
  • CorbettaP. (2007). Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. McGraw-Hill.
  • CornelláA. (2009). Infoxication: seeking order in information. Infonomia Books.
  • Damiano, S. (2014). Leadership is upside down. About My Brain.
  • 10.5465/amp.2014.0013
  • 10.4018/978-1-7998-7951-0.ch003
  • EdvinssonL.MaloneM. S. (1999). Intellectual Capital. Barcelona: Gestion.
  • 10.1108/LODJ-06-2016-0145
  • Estadística de Puertos del Estado. (2020). https://www.puertos.es/es-es/estadisticas/EstadisticaMensual/03%20Marzo%202020.pdf
  • 10.17163/ret.n18.2019.04
  • 10.3390/ijerph17010069
  • 10.1080/23303131.2019.1569574
  • 10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0121
  • 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106004
  • Khan, S. N. (Ed.). (2022). Leadership and Followership in an Organizational Change Context. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2807-5.
  • KováčE.VinogradovV.ŽigićK. (2010). Technological leadership and persistence of monopoly under endogenous entry: Static versus dynamic analysis.Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 34(8), 1421–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.03.011
  • Lagadec, P. (2009). A new cosmology of risks and crises: time for a radical shift in paradigm and practice. Review of Policy Research, 26(4), 473-487. Recuperado de https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00338386
  • LashS. (2005). Critique of Information. Amorrortu.
  • López-RegaladoM. E.Ahumada-TelloE.Ravina-RipollR. (2020). University Social Responsibility from the perspective of Happiness Management. The case of the Faculty of Accounting and Administration of the Autonomous University of Baja California (Tijuana-Mexico).Revista ESPACIOS, 41(4), 26.
  • LymanP.VarianH. R. (2003). How much information. UC Berkeley.
  • ManovichL. (2006). The language of the new media. Paidós.
  • MolesA.CostaJ. (1989). La imagen didáctica. CEAC.
  • 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653034
  • OuakouakM. L.ZaitouniM. G.AryaB. (2020). Ethical leadership, emotional leadership, and quitting intentions in public organizations.Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0206
  • 10.4018/978-1-7998-5015-1.ch008
  • 10.4018/978-1-7998-6975-7.ch008
  • OztemelE.GursevS. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8
  • Popescu, C. R. (2022a). Mindfulness at Work, a Sound Business Investment: Focusing on the Employee Well-Being While Increasing Creativity and Innovation. In C. Popescu (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era (pp. 1–34). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2523-7.ch001.
  • Popescu, C. R. (2022b). Mindfulness Business Principles: Producing Outstanding Value and Encouraging Community Connections. In C. Popescu (Ed.), COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on New Economy Development and Societal Change (pp. 196–228). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3374-4.ch010.
  • Popescu, C. R. (2022c). Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance by Avoiding Management Bias and Tax Minimization: Reaching a General Consensus Regarding a Minimum Global Tax Rate. In C. Popescu (Ed.), COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on New Economy Development and Societal Change (pp. 94–132). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3374-4.ch006.
  • RagoA.RibeiroN.CunhaM. P.JesuinoJ. C. (2011). How happiness mediates the organizational virtuousness and affective commitment relationship.Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.009
  • RaniN.SamuelA. (2016). A study on generational differences in work values and person-organization fit and its effect on turnover intention of Generation Y in India.Management Research Review, 39(12), 1695–1719. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0249
  • 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727845
  • RoccasS.SagivL. (2010). Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 30–41. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00234.x
  • RodriguezA.RodriguezY. (2015). Metaphors for today’s leadership: VUCA world, millennial and Cloud Leaders.Journal of Management Development, 34(7), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2013-0110
  • Ruiz, A. (2015). Reliability and Validity: Conceptualization and calculation procedures with Spss. University of Barcelona. Retrieved from http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/65322/1/Fiabilidad_Validez.pdf
  • RussellJ. E. (2008). Promoting subjective well-being at work.Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707308142
  • Salas-VallinaA.AlegreJ.Fernández GuerreroR. (2018). Happiness at work in knowledge-intensive contexts: Opening the research agenda.European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.05.003
  • Salazar EstradaJ. G.Guerrero PupoJ. C.Machado RodríguezY. B.Cañedo AndaliaR. (2009). Clima y cultura organizacional: Dos componentes esenciales en la productividad laboral.Acimed, 20(4), 67–75.
  • 10.17398/2340-4256.13.143
  • 10.17163/ret.n18.2019.05
  • SarkarA. (2016). We live in a VUCA World: The importance of responsible leadership.Development and Learning in Organizations, 30(3), 9–12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DLO-07-2015-0062
  • SchwartzS. H. (2011). Values: Individual and cultural. In Van de VijverF. J. R.ChasiotisA.BreugelmansS. M. (Eds.), Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 463–493). Cambridge University Press.
  • SeligmanM. E. P. (1990). Learned Optimism. Knopf. Free Press.
  • ShermanA.BarokasG. (2019). Are happy people more employable? Evidence from field experiments.Applied Economics Letters, 26(17), 1384–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1558345
  • ShoreL. M.Coyle-ShapiroJ. A.-M.ChenX.-P.TetrickL. E. (2009). Social exchange in work settings: Content, process, and mixed models.Management and Organization Review, 5, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00158.x
  • TomprouM.XanthopoulouD.VakolaM. (2020). Socio-emotional and monetary employee-organization resource exchanges: Measurement and effects on daily employee functioning.Work and Stress, 34(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1616333
  • VandekerkhofP.SteijversT.HendriksW.VoordeckersW. (2018). Socio-emotional wealth separation and decision-making quality in family firm TMTs: The moderating role of psychological safety.Journal of Management Studies, 55(4), 648–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12277
  • Vargas-Hernández, J. G. (2021). Socio-Intercultural Entrepreneurship Capability Building and Development. In C. Popescu (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 259–276). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8426-2.ch013.
  • WhitemanW. E. (1998). Training and educating army officers for the 21st Century: Implications for the United States Military Academy. Defense Technical Information Center.