“We have an Ondas Award and a lot of anxiety”Engagement strategies and parasociality of the Estirando el chicle podcast

  1. Caro Castaño, Lucía 1
  2. Gallardo Hurtado, Lourdes 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

Anàlisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura

ISSN: 0211-2175 2340-5236

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Relacions Públiques en l'escena internacional. Disciplina acadèmica i realitat professional

Issue: 67

Pages: 145-164

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ANALISI.3570 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Anàlisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura


The Estirando el chicle [Stretching the chewing gum] audiovisual podcast is analyzed as a success story that focuses on the connection between the program and its social audiences to determine whether elements of parasociality exist. The case study method is used, with a mixed design that combines discourse analysis and content analysis to understand: 1) the discursive strategies used by the creators, searching for a co-orientation effect with their audience, and 2) whether fandom expresses the existence of parasociality on Youtube. The results show that the hosts use five strategies to be perceived as authentic and to connect with their audience: self-revelation, the “behind-the-scenes” narrative subgenre, visibility of mental health issues, rejection of the aspirational discourse of influencers, and the simulation of interaction. As regards signs of parasociality among the fandom, it is found that 63.8% of comments address the hosts with familiarity, 14.4% of the texts express affectivity belonging to the primary group, and the gratifications from the podcast obtained are entertainment (46.5%), the sense of belonging to the community (18.9%), self-expression (11%), identification (4.7%), and an improvement in some aspect of their life (4.7%).

Bibliographic References

  • AROESTI, R. (2021). “Tragic but true: how podcasters replaced our real friends”. The Guardian Life. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/6grkVu [20/12/2021].
  • BERRY, R. (2016). “Podcasting: Considering the evolution of the medium and its association with the word ‘radio’”. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio, 14 (1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.14.1.7_1
  • CARO-CASTAÑO, L. (2015). “Relaciones e interacciones parasociales en redes sociales digitales. Una revisión conceptual”. Revista Icono14, 13 (2), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v13i2.853
  • CASARES, B. (2021). “Estirando el chicle, premio Ondas 2021 a mejor podcast: ‘La violencia que sufrimos las mujeres en internet es muy fuerte’”. LaSexta.com. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3j7WmDk
  • CASTILLO, A. (2009). Relaciones Públicas. Teoría e historia. Barcelona: UOC.
  • COOMBS, W. T. and HOLLADAY, S. J. (2015). “Public relations ‘relationship identity’ in research: Enlightenment or illusion”. Public Relations Review, 41 (5), 689-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.12.008
  • DUFFY, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • ELLISON, N. and BOYD, D. (2013). “Sociality through social network sites”. In: W. H. DUTTON (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151-172.
  • ESCALAS, J. E. and BETTMAN, J. R. (2017). “Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging”. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 46 (2), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1274925
  • GLASER, B. G. and STRAUSS, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. London/New York: Routledge.
  • GOFFMAN, E. (1999). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.
  • HOFFNER, C. A. and BOND, B. J. (2022). “Parasocial Relationships, Social Media & Well-Being”. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101306
  • HORTON, D. and WOHL, R. (2006/1956). “Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance”. Particip@tions, 3(1). Retrieved from https://www.participations.org/03-01-04-horton.pdf
  • HWANG, K. and ZHANG, Q. (2018). “Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge”. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
  • IGLESIAS, C. and MARTÍN, V. (2020-present). Estirando el chicle [audiovisual podcast]. Podium Podcast. Retrieved from https://www.estirandoelchicle.es/podcast
  • KHAN, M. L. (2017). “Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?”. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
  • KRIPPENDORFF, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
  • LACALLE, C., GÓMEZ-MORALES, B.M. and NARVAIZA, S. (2021). “Friends or just fans? Parasocial relationships in online television fiction communities”. Communication & Society, 34 (3), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.15581/
  • LANE, A. and KENT, M. L. (2018). “Dialogic engagement”. In: K. JOHNSTON and M. TAYLOR (Eds.). The handbook of communication engagement. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 61-72.
  • MACÉ, E. (1997). “La televisión del pobre”. In: D. DAYAN (Coord.). En busca del público: recepción, televisión, medios. Barcelona: Gedisa, 185-206.
  • MARCOS-GARCÍA, S., DOMÉNECH-FABREGAT, H. and CASERO-RIPOLLÉS, A. (2021). The platformization of institutional political communication. The use of WhatsApp by local administrations. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 100-125. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1520
  • MARSHALL, P. D. (1998). Celebrity and power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • MARWICK, A. (2015). “You May Know Me from YouTube: (Micro-)Celebrity in Social Media”. In: P. D. MARSHALL and S. REDMOND (Eds.). A Companion to Celebrity. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475089.ch18
  • MARX, J., MIRBABAIE, M., BRENDEL, A. B. and ZANDER, K. (2021). “The Role of Parasocial Interactions for Podcast Backchannel Response”. In AMCIS 2021 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2021/strategic_is/strategic_is/2
  • OVELAR, M. (2022). “Estirando el chicle, más que Válidas: ‘Ahora es cuando los grandes de la industria nos prestan atención’”. Forbes.es. Retrieved from https://forbes.es/podcast/140866/estirando-el-chicle-mas-que-validas/
  • PERKS, L. G. and TURNER, J. S. (2019). “Podcasts and Productivity: A Qualitative Uses and Gratifications Study”. Mass Communication and Society, 22 (1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1490434
  • PERKS, L. G., TURNER, J. S. and TOLLISON, A. C. (2019). “Podcast Uses and Gratifications Scale Development”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63 (4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1688817
  • PHUA, J., JIN, S. V. and KIM, J. (2017). “Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention”. Telematics and Informatics, 34 (1), 412-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004
  • PREECE, J. J. and GHOZATI, K. (2001). “Experiencing empathy online”. In: R. E. RICE, and J. E. KATZ (Eds.). The Internet and health communication: Experiences and Expectations. London: Sage, 237-260. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233277
  • ROSAEN, S. F. and DIBBLE, J. L. (2017). “The impact of viewer perceptions of media personae and viewer characteristics on the strength, enjoyment, and satisfaction of parasocial relationships”. Communication Studies, 68 (1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1240701
  • SÁ, S. (2020). “As RP em rede e o envolvimento dialógico em plataformas feministas (“A Coletiva” e “INMUNE”)”. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 10 (20), 5-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-20-2020-02-05-26
  • SHOAI, A. (2020). “Diálogo entre organizaciones y públicos en la era digital: la ‘promesa incumplida’ de los nuevos medios y el discurso de la consultoría en España”. Profesional de la información, 29 (3), e290321. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.21
  • SWIATEK, L. (2018). “The podcast as an intimate bridging medium”. In: D. LLINARES, N. FOX and R. BERRY (Eds.). Podcasting. New Aural Cultures and Digital Media. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90056-8_9
  • TSAI, W.-H. S. and MEN, L. R. (2017). Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19 (11), 1848-1867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816643922
  • THELWALL, M., STUART, E., MAS-BLEDA, A., MAKITA, M. and ABDOLI, M. (2022). “I’m nervous about sharing this secret with you: YouTube influencers generate strong parasocial interactions by discussing personal issues”. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2022-0011
  • VAN RULER, B. (2015). “Agile Public Relations Planning: The Reflective Communication Scrum”. Public Relations Review, 41 (2), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.008
  • XIFRA, J. and GRAU, F. (2010). “Nanoblogging PR: The discourse on public relations in Twitter”. Public Relations Review, 36 (2), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.02.005