Desarrollo y validación del cuestionario de apoyo a las necesidades psicológicas básicas en educación física

  1. Sánchez Oliva, David
  2. Leo Marcos, Francisco Miguel
  3. Amado Alonso, Diana
  4. Cuevas, R.
  5. García Calvo, Tomás
Revista:
European Journal of Human Movement

ISSN: 0214-0071 2386-4095

Año de publicación: 2013

Número: 30

Páginas: 53-71

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: European Journal of Human Movement

Resumen

El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo desarrollar y validar un instrumento para valorar la percepción del alumnado sobre el apoyo del docente a las necesidades psicológicas básicas (autonomía, competencia y relaciones sociales) en clases de educación física. La muestra estaba formada por 2.227 estudiantes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 17 años (M = 13.97; DT = .79). Se llevaron a cabo análisis factoriales exploratorio y confirmatorio, análisis de fiabilidad y validez nomológica y análisis de invarianza factorial. Los resultados señalaron que el Cuestionario de Apoyo a las Necesidades Psicológicas Básicas (CANPB) podría ser un instrumento válido y fiable para analizar la percepción de apoyo a la autonomía, competencia y relaciones sociales, ofreciendo una escala que permite analizar desde una perspectiva más amplia los factores sociales que inciden en los procesos motivacionales desarrollados por el alumnado durante las clases de educación física.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., De Meyer, J., Van den Berghe, L., y Haerens, L. (2013). Development and evaluation of a training on need-supportive teaching in physical education: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 64–75.
  • American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New Jersey, Inc: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates.
  • Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., y Hagger, M. S. (2009). Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychology & Health, 24, 29–48.
  • Cheung, G. W., y Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement equivalence. Structural Equation Modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.
  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., y Finch, J. F. (1996). The Robustness of Test Statistics to Nonnormality and Specification Error in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagne, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., y Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942.
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., y Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 165–183.
  • Deci, Edward L, y Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Deci, Edward L, y Ryan, R. M. (2000). The «What» and «Why» of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
  • Evelein, F., Korthagen, F., y Brekelmans, M. (2008). Fulfilment of the basic psychological needs of student teachers during their first teaching experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1137–1148.
  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soós, I., y Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 632–653.
  • Hu, L., y Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. En R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hu, L., y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
  • Huéscar, E., y Moreno-Murcia, J. A. (2012). Relación del tipo de feed-back del docente con la percepción de autonomía del alumnado en clases de educación física. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 35, 87–98.
  • Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., y Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological methods, 14, 6–23.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., y Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific.
  • Lim, B. S. C., y Wang, C. K. J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 52–60.
  • Merenda, P. F. (2007). Psychometrics and psychometricians in the 20th and 21st centuries: how it was in the 20th century and how it is now. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 3–20.
  • Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., Chillon, M., y Parra, N. (2008). Adaptación a la educación física de la escala de las necesidades psicológicas básicas en el ejercicio. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25, 295–303.
  • Moreno, J. A., Parra, N., y González-Cutre, D. (2008). Influencia del apoyo a la autonomía, las metas sociales y la relación con los demás sobre la desmotivación en educación física. Psicothema, 20, 636–641.
  • Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., y Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: evidence for a motivational model. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 240–68.
  • Moutão, J. M. R. P., Serra, L. F. C., Alves, J. A. M., Leitão, J. C., y Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2012). Validation of the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale in a Portuguese sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 399–409.
  • Mullan, E., Markland, D., y Ingledew, D. K. (1997). A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analytic procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 745–752.
  • Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444–453.
  • Ntoumanis, N., y Standage, M. (2009). Motivation in physical education classes: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 194–202.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1991). Teoría psicométrica. México, DF: Trillas. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy-Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236.
  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175.
  • Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., y Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.
  • Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
  • Sánchez-Oliva, D., Leo, F. M., Sánchez-Miguel, P. A., Amado, D., y Garcia-Calvo, T. (2013). Desarrollo de un modelo causal para explicar los comportamientos positivos en las clases de educación física. Acción Motriz, 10, 48–58.
  • Skinner, E. A., y Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.
  • Skinner, E. A., y Edge, K. (2002). Parenting, motivation, and the development of children’s coping. En L. J. Crockett (Ed.), Agency, Motivation, and the Life Course: The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 77–143). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Standage, M., Duda, J. L., y Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411–433.
  • Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., Standage, M., y Spray, C. M. (2010). Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: a multilevel linear growth analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 99–120.
  • Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., y Smith, B. (2009). The social context as a determinant of teacher motivational strategies in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 235– 243.
  • Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., y Standage, M. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to understanding the antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 75–94.
  • Taylor, I. M., y Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747–760.
  • Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., y Ntoumanis, N. (2010). The effect of an intervention to improve newly qualified teachers’ interpersonal style, students motivation and psychological need satisfaction in sport-based physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 242–253.
  • Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity. En N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, y C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 59– 83). New York: Wiley.
  • Van den Berghe, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Cardon, G., Kirk, D., y Haerens, L. (En prensa). Research on self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy.
  • Vlachopoulos, S. P., Katartzi, E. S., y Kontou, M. G. (2011). The Basic Psychological Needs in Physical Education Scale. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 263–280.
  • Vlachopoulos, S. P., Ntoumanis, N., y Smith, A. L. (2010). The basic psychological needs in exercises scale: translation and evidence for cross-cultural validity. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 394–412.
  • Vlachopoulos, S. P., y Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and anitial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10, 179–201.
  • Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational Predictors of Weight Loss and Weight-Loss Maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 115–126.
  • Williams, G. C., y Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779.
  • Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., y Wild, T. C. (2006). The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Pshycology, 28, 231–251.
  • Zhang, T., Solmon, M. A., Kosma, M., Carson, R. L., y Gu, X. (2011). Need support, need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and physical activity participation among middle school students self-determination theory. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 51–68.