La evaluación y retroalimentación electrónica entre iguales para la autorregulación y el aprendizaje estratégico en la universidadla percepción del alumnado

  1. B. Gallego Noche 1
  2. V. Quesada Serra 1
  3. M.A. Gómez Ruiz 1
  4. J. Cubero Ibáñez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

Journal:
REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria

ISSN: 1696-1412,  1887-4592

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 15

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4995/REDU.2017.5991 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria

Abstract

The implementation of successful assessment for learning practices requires a co-responsibility of students and teachers. Participative assessment practices and feedback are key elements in assessment for learning to enhance student’s self-regulation and strategic learning. More specifically, through peer-assessment students participate in a dialogic process where they assess their co-equals’ performances and tasks offering constructive feedback. In such cases, technologies can facilitate and enrich the whole process. This paper provides an insight of student perceptions about their participation in peer-assessment and peer-feedback practices using information and communication technologies (ICT). Nine lecturers from different studies and 195 students participated in the research. Data gathering was implemented with a questionnaire that questioned about the possibilities and difficulties of three main topics: peer-assessment and peer-feedback process, the assessment task and the use of technologies to support the process. Results show positive appraisal of students in all the categories. Participants seem to highlight that providing peer-assessment and feedback enhance their critical skills when assessing their own performance. Still, to improve the results there is a need to train students in assessment, communication and technologies. To conclude, some prospective research actions are drawn stressing the contributions to feedback that electronic and virtual resources can provide

Bibliographic References

  • ANECA (2007). El profesional flexible en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Informe Ejecutivo del Proyecto Reflex. Recuperado de: http://www.unizar.es/ice/images/stories/ calidad/REFLEX-ANECApdf.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • ANECA (2007). El profesional flexible en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Informe Ejecutivo del Proyecto Reflex. Recuperado de: http://www.unizar.es/ice/images/stories/ calidad/REFLEX-ANECApdf.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Asghar, A. (2010). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862834
  • Asghar, A. (2010). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862834
  • Bordas, M. I. y Cabrera, F. (2001). Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes centrados en el proceso. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 218, 25-48.
  • Bordas, M. I. y Cabrera, F. (2001). Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes centrados en el proceso. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 218, 25-48.
  • Boud, D. y Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. https://doi. org/10.1080/02602930600679050
  • Boud, D. y Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. https://doi. org/10.1080/02602930600679050
  • Boud, D. y Molloy, L. (Eds.) (2013). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. London: Routledge.
  • Boud, D. y Molloy, L. (Eds.) (2013). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. London: Routledge.
  • Brew, A. (2003). La autoevaluación y la evaluación por compañeros. En S. Brown y A. Glasner. (Eds.), Evaluar en la universidad. Problemas y nuevos enfoques, 179-189. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Brew, A. (2003). La autoevaluación y la evaluación por compañeros. En S. Brown y A. Glasner. (Eds.), Evaluar en la universidad. Problemas y nuevos enfoques, 179-189. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. En Boud, D. y Molloy, L. (Eds.). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, 90-103. London: Routledge.
  • Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. En Boud, D. y Molloy, L. (Eds.). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, 90-103. London: Routledge.
  • Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. y Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407. https://doi. org/10.1080/03075071003642449
  • Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. y Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407. https://doi. org/10.1080/03075071003642449
  • Cebrián, M. y Bergman, M.E. (2014). Evaluación formativa mediante e-rúbricas. REDU, Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ redu.2014.6427
  • Cebrián, M. y Bergman, M.E. (2014). Evaluación formativa mediante e-rúbricas. REDU, Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ redu.2014.6427
  • Cho, Y. H. y Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
  • Cho, Y. H. y Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
  • Cho, K. y MacArthur, C. (2012). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instructions, 20(4), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2009.08.006
  • Cho, K. y MacArthur, C. (2012). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instructions, 20(4), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2009.08.006
  • Frías-Navarro, D. (2014). Alfa de Cronbach y consistencia interna de los ítems de un instrumento de medida. Recuperado de: http://www.uv.es/~friasnav/ AlfaCronbach.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Frías-Navarro, D. (2014). Alfa de Cronbach y consistencia interna de los ítems de un instrumento de medida. Recuperado de: http://www.uv.es/~friasnav/ AlfaCronbach.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Friedman, B. A., Cox, P. L. y Maher, L. E. (2008). An expectancy theory motivation approach to peer assessment. Journal of Management Education, 32(5), 580-612. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1052562907310641
  • Friedman, B. A., Cox, P. L. y Maher, L. E. (2008). An expectancy theory motivation approach to peer assessment. Journal of Management Education, 32(5), 580-612. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1052562907310641
  • García Jiménez, E., Gallego Noche, B. y Gómez Ruiz, M. A. (2015). Feedback and SelfRegulated Learning: How Feedback Can Contribute to Increase Students’ Autonomy as Learners. En Peris-Ortiz, M. y Merigó, J.M. (Eds.) Sustainable Learning in Higher Education, 113-130. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-10804-9_9
  • García Jiménez, E., Gallego Noche, B. y Gómez Ruiz, M. A. (2015). Feedback and SelfRegulated Learning: How Feedback Can Contribute to Increase Students’ Autonomy as Learners. En Peris-Ortiz, M. y Merigó, J.M. (Eds.) Sustainable Learning in Higher Education, 113-130. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-10804-9_9
  • Gibbs, G. y Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31.
  • Gibbs, G. y Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31.
  • Glover, C. y Brown, E. (2006). Written Feedback for Students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 7(1), 1-16., https:// doi.org/10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
  • Glover, C. y Brown, E. (2006). Written Feedback for Students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 7(1), 1-16., https:// doi.org/10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
  • Gómez Ruiz, M.A., Rodríguez Gómez, G. e Ibarra Sáiz, M.S. (2013). Desarrollo de las competencias básicas de los estudiantes de Educación Superior mediante la e-Evaluación orientada al aprendizaje. RELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.19.1.2457
  • Gómez Ruiz, M.A., Rodríguez Gómez, G. e Ibarra Sáiz, M.S. (2013). Desarrollo de las competencias básicas de los estudiantes de Educación Superior mediante la e-Evaluación orientada al aprendizaje. RELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.19.1.2457
  • Hamer, J., Kell, C. y Spence, F. (2007). Peer Assessment Using Aropa. In Proc. Ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2007), Ballarat, Australia. CRPIT, 66. Mann, S. and Simon, Eds. ACS. 43-54. Recuperado de: http://crpit. com/confpapers/CRPITV66Hamer.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Hamer, J., Kell, C. y Spence, F. (2007). Peer Assessment Using Aropa. In Proc. Ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2007), Ballarat, Australia. CRPIT, 66. Mann, S. and Simon, Eds. ACS. 43-54. Recuperado de: http://crpit. com/confpapers/CRPITV66Hamer.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Hattie, J. y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  • Hattie, J. y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  • Ibarra Sáiz, M.S, Rodríguez Gómez, G. y Gómez Ruiz, M.A. (2012). La evaluación entre iguales: beneficios y estrategias para su práctica en la universidad. Revista de Educación, 359. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-359-092
  • Ibarra Sáiz, M.S, Rodríguez Gómez, G. y Gómez Ruiz, M.A. (2012). La evaluación entre iguales: beneficios y estrategias para su práctica en la universidad. Revista de Educación, 359. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-359-092
  • Jones, N., Georghiades, P. y Gunson, J. (2012). Student feedback via screen capture digital video: stimulating student’s modified action. Higher Education, 64(5), 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7
  • Jones, N., Georghiades, P. y Gunson, J. (2012). Student feedback via screen capture digital video: stimulating student’s modified action. Higher Education, 64(5), 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7
  • Leach, L., Neutze, G. y Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and Empowerment: Some critical questions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120063457
  • Leach, L., Neutze, G. y Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and Empowerment: Some critical questions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120063457
  • Liu, N. F. y Carless, D. (2006). Peer Feedback: the Learning Element of Peer Assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi. org/10.1080/13562510600680582
  • Liu, N. F. y Carless, D. (2006). Peer Feedback: the Learning Element of Peer Assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi. org/10.1080/13562510600680582
  • Liu, X. y Li, L. (2014). Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602 938.2013.823540
  • Liu, X. y Li, L. (2014). Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602 938.2013.823540
  • López Pastor, V. (Coord.) (2009). La evaluación formativa y compartida en docencia universitaria: propuestas, técnicas, instrumentos y experiencias. Madrid: Narcea.
  • López Pastor, V. (Coord.) (2009). La evaluación formativa y compartida en docencia universitaria: propuestas, técnicas, instrumentos y experiencias. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Monereo, C. (2007). Hacia un nuevo paradigma del aprendizaje estratégico: el papel de la mediación social, del self y de las emociones. Revista Electrónica de investigación Psicoeducativa, 5(3), 497-534.
  • Monereo, C. (2007). Hacia un nuevo paradigma del aprendizaje estratégico: el papel de la mediación social, del self y de las emociones. Revista Electrónica de investigación Psicoeducativa, 5(3), 497-534.
  • Murillo, F.J. e Hidalgo, N. (2015). Enfoques fundamentales de la Evaluación de Estudiantes para la Justicia Social. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 8(1), 4361.
  • Murillo, F.J. e Hidalgo, N. (2015). Enfoques fundamentales de la Evaluación de Estudiantes para la Justicia Social. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 8(1), 4361.
  • Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5) 501517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
  • Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5) 501517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
  • Nicol, D. (2013). Peer review: putting feedback processes in students’ hands, Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice. Journal of the Centre for Higher Education Practice. University of Ulster.
  • Nicol, D. (2013). Peer review: putting feedback processes in students’ hands, Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice. Journal of the Centre for Higher Education Practice. University of Ulster.
  • Nicol, D. y Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  • Nicol, D. y Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A. y Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A. y Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  • Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gómez, S. y Crook, A. C. (2011). Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
  • Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gómez, S. y Crook, A. C. (2011). Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
  • Pearce, J., Mulder, R. y Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review. CSHE. Recuperado de: http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/teaching_in_practice/ docs/Student_Peer_Review.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Pearce, J., Mulder, R. y Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review. CSHE. Recuperado de: http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/teaching_in_practice/ docs/Student_Peer_Review.pdf [Último acceso: marzo, 2017].
  • Pozo, J. I. y Monereo, C. (2002). El aprendizaje estratégico. Enseñar a aprender desde el currículo. Madrid: Aula XXI.
  • Pozo, J. I. y Monereo, C. (2002). El aprendizaje estratégico. Enseñar a aprender desde el currículo. Madrid: Aula XXI.
  • Price, M., Handley, K. y Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focussing Attention on Engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079 .2010.483513
  • Price, M., Handley, K. y Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focussing Attention on Engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079 .2010.483513
  • Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, M. A., Kirschner, P. A. y Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative PeerAssessment in a CSCL Environment: a Case Study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099219
  • Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, M. A., Kirschner, P. A. y Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative PeerAssessment in a CSCL Environment: a Case Study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099219
  • Quesada Serra, V., Rodríguez Gómez, G. e Ibarra Sáiz, M.S. (2014). What are we missing? Spanish lecturers’ perceptions of their assessment practices. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014 .930353
  • Quesada Serra, V., Rodríguez Gómez, G. e Ibarra Sáiz, M.S. (2014). What are we missing? Spanish lecturers’ perceptions of their assessment practices. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014 .930353
  • Rodríguez-Gómez, G. e Ibarra-Sáiz, M.S. (2015). Assessment as Learning and Empowerment: Towards Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. En M. PerisOrtiz & J.M. Merigó Lindahl (Eds.), Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. Developing Competencies for the Global Marketplace, 1-20. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_1
  • Rodríguez-Gómez, G. e Ibarra-Sáiz, M.S. (2015). Assessment as Learning and Empowerment: Towards Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. En M. PerisOrtiz & J.M. Merigó Lindahl (Eds.), Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. Developing Competencies for the Global Marketplace, 1-20. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_1
  • Santos Guerra, M. A. (2003). Una flecha en la diana: la evaluación como aprendizaje. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Santos Guerra, M. A. (2003). Una flecha en la diana: la evaluación como aprendizaje. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Segers, M. y Dochy, F. (2001). New Assessment Forms in Problem-Based Learning: the Value-Added of the Students’ Perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076291
  • Segers, M. y Dochy, F. (2001). New Assessment Forms in Problem-Based Learning: the Value-Added of the Students’ Perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076291
  • Topping, K. J. (2003) Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility. En Segers, M., Dochy, F. y Cascallar, E. (Eds) Optimizing new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards, 55-87. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4
  • Topping, K. J. (2003) Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility. En Segers, M., Dochy, F. y Cascallar, E. (Eds) Optimizing new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards, 55-87. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4
Data source: Dialnet