Un examen de los factores explicativos del ejemplo del empleo de las presentaciones a analistas en la empresa española

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE RELACIONES CON INVERSORES (AERI) (2000): “Las relaciones con inversores en las empresas españolas”, Revista de AERI.
• ANDRÉS PÉRE2, T.; GANDÍA CABEDO, J.L (2002): “Aportaciones de las nuevas tecnologías de la ioforrriación a la mejora del modelo de comunicación empresarial”, X Encuentro de Profesores Vnívei'sitarios da Contabilidad, Santiago de Compostela.
• ARNOLD, J. y MOIZER, P. (1984): “A survey of the methods used by UK investments analystsa to appmise comparative soidy of US and UK pracfices”, Aecoimting and B ness Reseai-ch, summer, pp. 195-207.
• ARNOLD, J., MOIZER, P. y NOREEN, E. (1984): “lnvestments appraisal methods of Financial analysis: a comparative study of US und UK practices”, /tifeizatiooaf Joi‹ir«f ofAccoiinnng, vol. l9, n° 2, pp. 1-18.
• BABÍO, M.R; MURO, M.F. y VIDAL. R, (2003): “La influencia del tamaño y la cotizactón en la publicación de infomiaeión voluntaria: un análisis basado en percepciones de costes y beneficios”” ñevisto áe Gotitaóiíiáaá, vot. ó, n." 11, pp, 19-55.
• BARKER, R.G. (1998): ‘de market for information evídence from finance directors, analysts and fünd managers”, Accouniíng and Business Research, vol. 29, n,° 1, pp. 3-20.
• BOWEN, R.M.; DAVIS, A.K. y MATSUMOTO, D.A. [2002]: “Do conference calls affect analysts’ forecasts?”, The AccouHting Review, vol. 77, n.° 2, pp, 285-316.
• BRETON, G. y TAFFL£R, KJ.: (1995): “Creative accounting and investment analysis response”, Accoitntiitg and Business Research, vol. 25, n.° 98, pp. 81-92.
• BROWN, S., LO, K. y LYS, T. (2000): ‘Ese of R° in accounting Research: measuting changes in value relevante over the last four decades”, Journal ofAceauntíttg and Economías, vol. 28, ti.° 3, pp. 83-115.
• BUSHEE, B.J., MATSUMOTO, D.A. y MILLSR, G.S. (2003): “Open versus close conference call. The detenuinants and effects of broading access to disclosure”, Jaunial of Accounting and úcottomics, vol. 34, pp. 149-lB0.
• - (2064): “Managerial and lnvestor responses to diselosure xegulation: the case of FD and eonfe- rence calls”, WoiFng Paper, The Wharton School, Aptil.
• BYARD, D.; BARRON, O.E.; KILE, C. y RIELD, E. (2001): ‘Tligit-Technology intangibles and analysis’ foiecasf’, WOFking Papei, Baruch College.
• CANAVOS, G.G. !995). Probabilidad y Estadística. Aplicaciones y Métodos. McGraw-Hill, 1\4adrid.
• CAÑIBANO, L.; GARCÍA-AYUSO, M.; y SÁNCHEZ, P. (2000): “Accounting for intangibles: a literatiite review”, Joui+aí ofAccounting Literatitre, vol. 19, n.° 1, pp. 102-130.
• CASAS SÁNCHEZ, 1.W. f199a: lifereticia estadf'stica para Economía y Admit›istraciót de Empresas, Ed. Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces, Madrid.
• CERF, A.R. (1961): Corporate Repontng and Investment Decisfoiis, University of California Press, pp. 25-27.
• CHOW, C.W. y WONG-BORHN, A. (1987): “Volun.tary financial disclosure by Mexican Corporations”, Accountiitg kevin July, pp. 533-541.
• COOKE, T.E. (1989): “Disclosure in the corpotate annual reports of Swedish compartes”, Accouiiti»g and Business Research, July, pp. 533-541.
• FRANCIS, J.; HANNA, J.D. y PHILBRICK, D.R. (1997): “Management communications with security analysis”, Jaialial ofAccounting and ñroiioiiiics, vol. 24, pp. 363-394.
• FRANKEL, R., JOHNSON, M. y SKINNER, D.J. (1999): “An eeipirical examination of conferen- ce calls as a voluntaty disclosure medium”, Jountal ofAccounting Researclt, vol. 37, n.° 1, pp. 133-150.
• FERGUSON. M.; LAM, K. y LEE, G. (2002): “Voluntary disclosure by state-owned enterprises listed on the stock exchange aY llang Kong”. Joinzal of International Financial Management aitd Accaiuiting, vol. 13, n.° 2, pp. 125-152.
• GINER INCHAUSTI, B. (1995): M divulgación de infozinnción Jmnciero: min ñwesngaciózi empírica. Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Ctientas. Madrid.
• GÓMEZ SALA, J.C.; GIL ÁLVAREZ, A. y POVEDA, F. (2002): “Repuesta del mercado y de los analistas financieros a las presentaciones de empresa organizadas por el lEAf’”, H Congi-eso AEDEM, Alicante.
• GRAN S.I., MEEK, G.R y ROBERTS, C.B. (1995): “International Capital Market Pressures and Voluntary Annual Report disclosures by U.S. and U.R Multinationalss’, Joiii›tal of Inteniattonal Financial Management aitd Aecountítig. vol. 6, n.° 1, pp. 43-68.
• GRAY, S.J. y ROBERTS, CX. (1989): “Voluntary Information Diaclosure and the Btiüsh Multinationals”. En Hopwood, A. (ed.): littetaiational Pressw es for Accoiintiitg Cfiange. pp. 116-139. ilemel Mempstead. Prentice-EaII International.
• HASSETT, K.A. (2000): “Outlaw selective disclosure? No, the more information, the better”, The Wall Street Jounial, August 10.
• HEALEY, P. HUTTON, A. y PALEPU, R (1998): “Do firms benefit from voluntary disclosure?” iPorkiiig Paper, Harvard Business School.
• HELFIN, F.; SUBRAMANYAM, K,R. y ZHANG, Y. (2002): “Regulation FD and the financial information envíronmenP', Working Papei,• Indiana University.
• HO, S.S,M. y WONG, K.S. (2001): “A study of the relationship between cotporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary dísclosure”, Joitnital of lnternatianal Aecollliting, Atfditiitg & 7'aroiíoii, vol. 10, pp. 139-156.
• HOLLAND, I. (1997): Por porate CoiiimunícaRo›ts with lnstituttanal Sliai•eliolders, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
• - (1998): “Private voluntary disclosure, financial intermediation and marker efficiency”, Journal ofBnsiness, Finance and Accounting. voL 25, pp. 29-68.
• HOSSAIN, M., TAN, L.M. y ADAMS, M. (1994): “Voluntary disclosute in an emerging capital market; some empirieal evidence from firms listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange”, fte Interitational Joitnitaí ofAccoiuitiiig, vol. 29, pp. 334-351.
• JOHANSSON, J. (2000): “The grey zone of stock exchange information. A risk for insider tra- ding”, íPoiiiiig Papei,• Lulea University of Technology.
• KING, R, POWNALL, G. y WAYMIRE, G.(1990): “Expectations adjustments via timely mana- gement forecasts: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for future research”, Journal o/ Accoiititmg Literatura, vol. 9, pp. 113-144.
• KOHLBECK, M. y MAGILKE, M. (2002): “The irnpact of concurrent conference calls on the information of eamings announcements”, Workiiig Paper, University of Wisconsin.
• LANG, M. y LUNDEOLM, R. í1993): “Cross Sectional determinants of analysis iatings of cor- porate disclosures”, JOmsial ofAecoynting Reseaiclt, vol. 31, n.° 2, pp. 246-271.
• - (1996): “Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behaviour”, 7’/ie Accountiiig Review, vol. 71, n.• 4, pp. 467-492.
• LARRÁN JORGE, lvL (2001): El tnercado de f@oi7iiacióti Voluntaria eit las Bolsas de Valoi-es. ICAC, Madrid.
• LARRÁN JORGE, M. y GfNER INCHAUSTI, B. (2002): “The use of the Internet for Corporate Reporting by Spanish Companies”, The International Jounial ofDigital Accoutitin"g Reseai-cli, vol. 2, n.° 1, pp. 53-83.
• LARRÁN JOROE, M. y REES, W. (1999): Tecnicas, i‘eeursos infonuativos y pi•ácticas seguidas por los analistas fítiaitcieios, Instituto Español de Analistas Financieros.
• - (2003): “Private disclosure in the Spanish capital market: evidence from financial analysis and investor relations directors”, Revista Espaíiola de r•inattciación y Contabilidad, n.° 115, pp. 116-152.
• LEFIWICH, R.U, WATTS, R.L. y ZIMMERMAN, J.L. (1981). ‘Voluntary Corporate Disclosure: The Case of Interim Reporting", low-oral ofAecoiintîng Research, vol. 19, supplement, pp. 50-77.
• LEV, B. y ZAROWIN, It (1999): “The boundaries of fuianGîal reporting and how to extend them”, Journal ofAccoiinting Research. vol. 37, n.° 3, pp. 353-386.
• LEY 24/1998, de 28 de julio, del Mercado de Valores. BOE de 29 de julío.
• LEY 44/2002, de 22 de noviembie, de Medidas de Reforma del Sistema Financiero. BOE. BOE de 23 de noviembre.
• MAHON8Y, W.F. (199 I): Investor Relatîotis. The pt-ofessianals guide to finaiteíal marketing ated coiiinttiiiic‹uions, New York. lnsñtute of Finance.
• MAR8TON, C.L. (1993): Company Cani•iunícatiotis with aitalysts and fund itiayageis. A birdy o/f/re investors relations activities oflarge UK quitted eoiitpaities, PhD Tàesis, University of Glasgow.
• - (1996)- l›ivestoF Rełatioits. txeetinz the analysts. The I súWłe nd C.¥prłe.zrû _k_cee •N.•q•î Scotland.
• McNALLY, G.M., ENG, L.I-I. y HASSELDŒE, C.R (1982): “Corporate Financial Reporting in New Zealand: An analysis of user preferences, corporate characteristic and disclosure practices for dis- cretionary information”, Accouutittg and Busiiiess Resemzłi, winter, pp, 11-20.
• MOHANRAM, P. (1999): “Hf w do yong ferns choose among different modes of investor com- munications†" Yorúng Paper, New York University.
• OLBERT, L. (1994): “Stock valuatioti methods of financial analysts in a thin stock market in Sweden, with comparisons to the U.K. and the United States”, the Inter natioiial You -nal ofAceounting, n.° 29, pp. 123-135.
• nAFFOURNInR. B. (1995): ’be determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by Swiss listed companies”, Tłie Eumpean Accounting pevíew, vol. 4, n.° 2, pp. 261-280.
• ROBB, S.W.G.; STNGLE, L.E. y ZARZESKI, M.T. (2001): ’Nonfinancial disclosures acrosi Anglo-American countries”, Journal oflitteruatiotialAceounttng, Auditing and Taxatiott, vol. 10, pp. 71-83.
• SECURITŒS AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (2000): Selective disclosure and Issues Tradiiig, Octoher. Disponible eg http:f/www.sec.gon/rules/proposedf34fi2239.htm
• SHANE, P. SODERSTROM, N. Y YOON, S. (2002): "Earning and price discovery in the post- Reg FD inforatation environment", Woking Paper, University of Colorado.
• TABACHNICK, B.G. y FIDELL, L.S. (1989): Using Multivariate Stat:îsfics, New York, Harper
• TASKER, S. (1998a): “Bridging the information gap: quarterly conference calls as a medium for voluntary disclosure“, Review ofAccounting Studies 3, pp. 137-167.
• - t 998b): “Technology company conference calls: a small sample study”, Journal ofFiftOlteiOl Statement Analysis, vol. 4, pp. 6-14.
• VERGOOSEN, R. (1993): 'be use and perceived importance of annual reports by investment analysis in the Netherlands”, european Accounting ftevim vol. 2, n.° 2, pp. 219-244.
• VERRECCHIA, R (1990): “Information quality and discretionary disclosure”, bottmsf of Accounting and Economics, vol. 5, e 365-380.
• WALLACE, ïŁS.O.; NASER, IN y MORA, A. (lS94): “The relationship between comprebensi- veness ofeorporate annual reports and firmcharacteristics in Spain “, Aceountìtig and Business Reseat-cli, vol, 25, n.° 97, pp. 41-53.
• WALMSLEY, T. YADAV, P. y REES, W {1992 j- “The information content of the company met ting programme of the society of investment analysts: 19ß5-1990”, Ro«maí of Dtisiitess, Finance and Accounting, vol. 19, m° 4, pp. 571-584.