Procesos de automatización cognitiva en alumnado con altas capacidades intelectuales

  1. Montero Linares, Juan
  2. Navarro Guzmán, José Ignacio
  3. Aguilar Villagrán, Manuel
Revue:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Année de publication: 2013

Volumen: 29

Número: 2

Pages: 454-461

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.29.2.123291 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Anales de psicología

Résumé

The traditional gifted children assessment model has several in-sufficiencies. It is based on IQ data as a main definition of giftedness. However this paper proposes other perspective from the processing in-formation theory. We studied other cognitive variables that could be used for gifted children�s assessment. A syllabic segmentation skills test was de-signed after the working memory�s Baddeley and automatic and controlled processes models by Shneider y Shiffrin. The syllabic segmentation skills test allows learning more about the routine information processing, and it is able to prove its predictive capacity identifying gifted students. A total of 480 primary school children from 6 to 9 years old participated in this study. After IQ were assessed with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), students were distributed in two different groups (gifted and non gifted). All participants were also assessed by the syllabic segmentation skills test. Different measurements for syllabic segmentation skills test�s standardization were collected. Results shown that gifted children had sig-nificant higher scores on syllabic segmentation than non gifted. This sug-gests that children with a IQ over 130 were able to make routine informa-tion processing faster than lower performers, and the syllabic segmentation skills test was able to discriminate gifted and non gifted students.

Références bibliographiques

  • Alsina, A. y Saíz, D. (2003). Un análisis comparativo del papel del bucle fo-nológico versus agenda visoespacial en el cálculo en niños de 7-8 años. Psicothema, 15, 241-246.
  • Baddeley, A. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarteley Journal of Experimen-tal Psychology, 18, 362-365.
  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders. 36, 189-208. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4.
  • Baddeley, A. (2010). Memoria de trabajo. En A. Baddley, M. W. Eysenck, y M. C. Anderson (Eds.), Memoria (pp. 63-91). Madrid: Alianza.
  • Baddeley, A., Thomsom, N. y Buchanan, M. (1975). Word lenght and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 14, 575-589.
  • Bailey, H., Dunlosky, J., & Kane, M. (2008). Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hy-pothesis. Memory y Cognition, 36, 1383-1390. doi:10.3758/MC.36.8.1383.
  • Carman, C.A. (2006). Relationships among traditional and modern con-structs used in identifying giftdness. Roeper Review, 28, 111-112.
  • Colom, R. y Flores-Mendoza, C. (2001). Inteligencia y memoria de trabajo: la relación entre factor g, complejidad cognitiva y capacidad de proce-samiento. Teoría e Pesquisa, 17, 37-47.
  • Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios A., Espinosa, M.J., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277-296. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.002,
  • Conway A. R., Kane M. J. & Engle R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547-552. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005.
  • Corbalán, J. y Limiñana, R. M. (2010). El genio en una botella. El test CREA, las preguntas y la creatividad. Introducción al monográfico "El test CREA, inteligencia creativa". Anales de Psicología, 26, 197-205.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E. y Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Bater-ía de evaluación de procesos lectores. Revisada. Madrid: TEA.
  • Finton, D. J. (2008). When Do Differences Matter? On-Line Feature Extraction Through Cognitive Economy. Recuperado de http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0404032v1.
  • Hoppe, Ch., y Stojanovic, E. (2009). Giftedness and the brain. The Psychologist, 22, 498-501.
  • Hower, J., Vandorpe, S. y Beckers, T. (2005). On the role of controlled cog-nitive processes in human associative learning. In J. A. Wills (Ed.), New directions in human associative learning (pp. 41-64). New Jersey: Whiley.
  • Jausovec, N. (2000). Differences in cognitive processes between gifted, intel-ligent, creative, and average individuals while solving complex prob-lems: an EEG study. Intelligence, 28, 213-237. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(00)00037-4.
  • Jiménez, J. y O'shanahan, I. (2008). Enseñanza de la lectura: de la teoría y la investigación a la práctica educativa. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 45, 5-25.
  • Kane, M.J. y Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention and general fluid intelligence: And individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 637-671.
  • Kavanagh, M. y Mohan, Th. (2008). Human Resource Information Systems: Basics, Applications, and Future Directions. Los Angeles: Sage Publications
  • Lépine, R., Barrouillet, P. y Camos, V. (2005). What makes working memory spans so predictive of high-level cognition? Psychonomic Bulletin y Review, 12, 165-170.
  • Manzanero, A. (2006). Procesos automáticos y controlados de memoria: Modelo Asociativo (HAM) vs. Sistema de Procesamiento General Abs-tracto. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 59, 373-412.
  • Navarro, J. I., Aguilar, M., Marchena, E., Ruiz, G., Menacho, I. y Van Luit, H. (2011).Longitudinal study of low and high achievers in early mat-hematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 28-41. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02043.x.
  • Navarro, J. I., Aguilar, M., Alcalde, C., Ruiz, G., Marchena, E. y Menacho, I. (2011). Inhibitory processes, working memory, phonological awareness, naming speed, and early arithmetic achievement. Spanish Journal of Psy-chology, 14(2), 580-588.
  • Oberauer, K., Süb, H., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O. y Wittmann, W. (2000). Working memory capacity-facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017-1046.
  • Ortiz, R., Jiménez, J. J., Muñetón, M., Rojas, E., Estévez, A., Guzmán, R., Rodríguez, C. y Naranjo, F (2008) Desarrollo de la percepción del habla en niños con dislexia. Psicothema, 20, 678-683.
  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1978). La teoría de los operadores constructivos. En J. Delval (Ed.), Las teorías, los métodos y el desarrollo temprano (pp. 208-227). Madrid: Alianza.
  • Pascual-Leone, J. y Johnson, J. M. (2001). Manual for the FIT: Figural intersec-tions test. Toronto, Canadá: Developmental Processes Laboratory, De-partment of Psychology, York University.
  • Pérez, C. (2005). Métodos estadísticos avanzados con SPSS. Madrid: Thomson.
  • Prieto, M.D. y Hervás, R. M. (2001). Estrategias de identificación y asesoramiento de alumnos superdotados. Murcia: Diego Marín.
  • Proctor, R. W. y Vu K. P. L. (2006). The cognitive revolution at age 50: has the promise of the information processing approach been fulfilled? Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 23, 253-284. doi: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc2103_1.
  • Raven, J. C. (1994). Standard progresive matrices. Madrid: TEA.
  • Renzulli, J. R. (1998). The three-ring conceptionof giftedness. In S. M. Baum, S. Reis, y L. R. Maxfields (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 123-168). Mansfield Centre, CT: Creative Lear-ning Press.
  • Sanz de Acedo, M. L. y Sanz de Acedo, M. T. (2008). Instrucciones explíci-tas para la ejecución creativa según dos tests de creatividad teniendo en cuenta la inteligencia. Anales de Psicología, 24, 129-137.
  • Sedó, M. (2007). Five Digit Test. Madrid: TEA.
  • Servera, M. y Llabrés, J. (2004). CSAT. Test de atención sostenida en la infancia. Madrid: TEA.
  • Schneider, W. y Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human, in-formation processing: Detection, search and attention. Psychological Re-view, 84, 1-66.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
  • Wechsler, D. (2005). Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para niños. Madrid: TEA.
La source de données: Dialnet