Análisis empírico de la prima por riesgo de negocio en el mercado de auditoria de pequeñas y medianas firmas adutoras en España

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abbott, L.; Parker, S., y Peters, G. F. 2006. Earnings Management, Litigation Risk, and Asymmetric Audit Fee Responses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1): 85-98.
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1983. Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards 47. New York, NY: AICPA.
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1992. Audit Risk Alert. The CPA Letter 72. New York: AICPA.
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1994. Acceptance and Continuance of Audit Clients. Practice Alert 93-94.
• Arruñada, B. 1999. The provision of non-audit services by auditors: Let the market evolve and decide. International Review of Law and Economics 19 (4): 513-531.
• Bartov, E.; Gul, F., y Tsui, J. 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualif cations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3):421-452.
• Bell, T. B.; Landsman, W. R., y Shackelford, D. A. 2001. Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (1): 35-43.
• Bell, T.; Doogar, R., y Solomon, I. 2008. Audit Labor Usage and Fees under Business Risk Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (4): 729-760.
• Bradshaw, M.; Richardson, S., y Sloan, R. 2001. Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals? Journal of Accounting Research 39 (1): 45-74.
• Cameran M. 2005. Audit Fees and the Large Auditor Premium in the Italian Market. International Journal of Auditing 9 (2): 129-146.
• Carmona Ibánez, P., y Momparler Pechuán, A. 2011. La prestación de servicios de consultoría por los auditores y la manipulación del resultado: estudio de la independencia del auditor en un país de la UE. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad XL (152): 587-612.
• Cano Rodríguez, M. 2007. Tamaño del auditor y calidad de auditoría. Revista Española de Finan-ciación y Contabilidad XXXVI (135): 481-507.
• Carcello, J. V., y Palmrose, Z. V. 1994. Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (suplemento): 1-30.
• Carcello, J. V.; Hermanson, D. R.; Neal, T. L., y Riley, R. R. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (otoño): 365-385.
• Chan, P; Ezzamel, M., y Gwilliam D. 1993. Determinants of Audit Fees for Quoted UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 20 (6): 765-786.
• Chaney, P. K., y Philipich, K. L. 2002. Shredded reputation. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1.221-1.245.
• Choi, J. H.; Kim, J. B.; Liu, X., y Simunic, D. 2008. Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big-4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 55-99.
• Cobin, P. 2002. International Dimensions of the Audit Fee Determinants Literature. International Journal of Auditing 6 (1):53-77.
• Comisión Europea. 2010. Green paper: Audit policy: Lessons from the crisis. Brussels: European Commission.
• Craswell, A. T., y Francis, J. R. 1999. Pricing initial audit engagements: A test of competing theories. The Accounting Review 74 (2): 201-216.
• DeAngelo, H.; DeAngelo, L., y Skinner D. J. 1994. Accounting Choice in Troubled Companies, Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1/2): 113-143.
• DeFond, M. L.; Francis, J. R., y Wong, T.J. 2000. Auditor Industry Specialisation and Market Segmentation by Big 6 and Non-big 6 Accounting Firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 (1): 49-66.
• De Fuentes, C., y Pucheta, M. C. 2009. Auditor independence, joint determination of audit and non-audit fees and the incidente of qualified audit reports. Academia. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración 43: 63-92.
• De Fuentes, C.; Illueca, M., y Pucheta, M. C. 2010. Disciplinary sanctions and audit quality. Empirical evidence from an external oversight system. 33 EAA Annual Conference. Estambul. Turquia.
• Elder, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J., y Zhou, N. 2009. Internal Control Weaknesses and Client Risk Management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 24 (4): 543-579.
• Firth, M. 1985. An analysis of audit fees and their determinants in New Zealand. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 4 (2): 23-37.
• Francis, J. 1984. The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133-151.
• Francis J., y Stokes, D. 1986. Audit Prices, Product Differentiation, and Scale Economies: Further Evidence from the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (2): 383-393.
• Francis J., y Simon, D. 1987. A Test of Audit Pricing in the small client segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review 62 (1): 145-157.
• Francis, J., y Krishnan, J. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (1): 135-165.
• Francis, J. R.; Reichelt, K., y Wang, D. 2005. The Pricing of National and City-Specific Reputations for Industry Expertise in the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review 80 (1): 113-136.
• García Benau, M. A.; Garrido, P.; Vico, A.; Moizer, P., y Humphrey, C. 1999. La calidad del servicio de auditoría: los auditores vistos por sus clientes. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 28 (102): 1005-1041.
• García Osma, B.; Gill de Albornoz Noguer B., y Gisbert Clemente, A. 2005 La investigación sobre Earnings Managements. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 34 (127): 1001-1034.
• Gul, F. A.; Jaggi, B., y Krishnan, G. 2007. Auditor independence: Evidence on the joint effects of auditor tenure and non-audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (2): 117-142.
• Guler, L.; Heron, N., y Zur, E. 2010. Does fraud damage auditor reputation? Evidence from a broad sample analysis. Working paper, Baruch College City University of New York.
• Hall, W. y Renner, A. 1988. Lessons that auditors ignore at their own risk. Journal of Accountancy 166 (julio): 50-58.
• Hay D.; Knechel W. R., y Wong, N. 2006. Audit Fees: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of supply and Demand Attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1):141-191.
• Hogan, C., y Wilkins, M. 2008. Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Effort in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 219-242.
• Houston, R.; Peters, M., y Pratt, J. 1999. The audit risk model, business risk and audit-planning decisions. The Accounting Review 74 (3): 281-298.
• Houston, R.; Peters, M., y Pratt, J. 2005. Nonlitigation risk and pricing audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24 (1): 37-53.
• Humphrey, C.; García Benau, M. A., y Ruiz Barbadillo, E. 2003. El debate de la responsabilidad civil de la auditoría en España: la construcción del discurso sobre la limitación de responsabilidades por las corporaciones professionals. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 32 (119): 1091-1136.
• Johnson, V.; Khurana, I., y Reynolds, J. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (4): 637-660.
• Johnstone, K. 2000. Client-acceptance decisions: simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation. Auditing; a Journal of Practice and Theory 19 (1): 1-25.
• Johnstone, K., y Bedard, J. 2001. Engagement planning, bid pricing, and client response in the market for initial attest engagements. The Accounting Review 76 (2): 199-220.
• Johnstone, K., y Bedard, J. 2003. Risk management in client acceptance decisions. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 1003-1025.
• Kinney, W. R. Jr., y McDaniel, L. S. 1989. 'Characteristics of Firms Correcting Previously Reported Quarterly Earnings Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (1): 71-93.
• Knechel, W. R. 2007. The business risk audit: origins, obstacles and opportunities. Accounting Organizations and Society 32 (4-5): 383-408.
• La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A., y Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance, Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1.113-1.155.
• Leuz, C.; Nanda, D., y Wysocki, P. 2003. Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (3): 505-527.
• Lyon, J., y Maher, M. 2005. The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (1): 133-151.
• Lys, T., y Watts, R. 1994. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (1): 65-93.
• Menon, K., y Williams, J. D. 1994. The insurance hypothesis and market prices. The Accounting Review 69 (2): 327-342.
• Monterrey Mayoral, J., y Sánchez Segura, A. 2007. Un estudio empírico de los honorarios del auditor. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 32 (septiembre): 81-110.
• Niemi, L. 2002. Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort. International Journal of Auditing 6 (1): 37-51.
• Niemi, L. 2004. Auditor Size and Audit Pricing: Evidence from Small Audit Firms. European Accounting Review 13 (3): 541-560.
• O'Keefe, T.; Simunic D., y Stein, M. 1994. The production of audit. Services: evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (2): 241-261.
• Palmrose, Z. V. 1983. The Pricing of Audit Services: Industry Differences and Other Insights. Proceedings of the 1983 DePaul University Research Symposium: 47-84.
• Palmrose, Z. V. The demand for quality differentiated audit services in an agency-cost setting: An empirical investigation. En A.R. Abdel-Khalik y I. Solomon (eds.): Auditing Research Symposiun 1984. Urbana, IL: Department of Accountancy, University of Illinois: 229-252.
• Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (1): 97-110.
• Peel, M. J., y Roberts, R. 2003. Audit fee determinants and auditor premiums: Evidence from the micro-firm sub-market. Accounting and Business Research 33 (3): 207-233.
• Pong, C. M., y Whittington, G. 1994. The determinants of audit fees: Some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 21 (8): 1071-1095.
• Pratt, J. Y., y Stice, J. 1994. The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review 69 (4): 639-656.
• Rosner, R. 2003. Earnings Manipulation in Failing Firms. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (2): 361-408.
• Seetharaman, A.; Gul, F. A., y Lynn, S.G. 2002. Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (1): 91-115.
• Shu, S. Z. 2000. Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting & Economics 29 (2): 173-205.
• Simon, D. T. 1985. The audit services market: Additional empirical evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 5 (2): 71-78.
• Simon, D. T., y Francis, J. R. 1988. The effect of auditor on audit fees: test of price cutting and price discovery. The Accounting Review 63 (2): 255-269.
• Simunic, D. 1980. The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
• Simunic, D. 1984. Auditing, Consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (2): 679-702.
• Simunic, D. A., and Stein, M. T. 1996. The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 15 (suplemento): 119-134.
• Stice, J. D. 1991. Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review 66 (3): 516-553.
• Turpen, R. 1990. Differential Pricing on Auditors' Initial Engagements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 9 (2): 60-76.
• Wallace, W. 1980. The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets. Touche Ross & Co
• Wilson, T. E., y Grimlund, R. A. 1990. An examination of the importance of an auditor's reputation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (2): 43-59.