El "derecho a la verdad" en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos

Referencias bibliográficas

• ACIROKOP, P., “A Truth Commission for Uganda? Opportunities and Challenges”, African Human Rights Law Journal, vol. 12, n. 2 (2012), pp. 417-447.
• ALEGRE, M. A., “El reconocimiento constitucional de la dignidad humana: significado y alcance”, Libro homenaje a D. Íñigo Cavero Lataillade, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2005, pp. 55-70.
• BIDART, G., Tratado Elemental de Derecho Constitucional argentino, t. I, Ediar, Buenos Aires, 1995, pp. 632 y ss.
• BIRKER, M., “Le volet procedural de l’article 3 et ses rapports énigmatiques avec le droit à un recours effectif: CourEDH, Khachiev et Akïeva. c. Rusie, 24 février 2005”, L’Europe des libertés: revue d’actualité juridique (Europe des libertés), n. 17, sept. 2005, p. 19.
• BISSET, A., “Rethinking the Powers of Truth Commissions in Light of the ICC Statute”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 7, no. 5 (noviembre. 2009), pp. 963-982.
• BOBBIO, N., El tiempo de los derechos, Sistema, Madrid, 1991, p. 47.
• CARPANELLI, E., “Extraordinary renditions e diritti umani: alcune riflessioni sul caso Abu Omar”, Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, vol. 7, n. 2 (2013), pp. 315-330.
• CÉRÉ, J-P., “L’isolement en prison d’un terroriste ne constitue pas un traitement inhumain et dégradant, mais viole l’article 13 de la Convention européenne”, Recueil Dalloz, 181e année, n. 19 (12 de mayo de 2005), pp. 1272-1275.
• CHAPMAN, A. R., “The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 1 (febrero, 2001), pp. 1-43.
• CHETAIL, V., “Le droit des réfugiés à l’épreuve des droits de l’homme: bilan de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme sur l’interdiction du renvoi des étrangers menacés de torture et de traitements inhumains ou dégradants”, Revue Belge de Droit International, vol. 37, n. 1 (2004), pp. 155-210.
• CUÉLLAR, P. S., “The Necessity for Establishing a Truth Commission in Colombia within its Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Process”, Revista del Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, n. 55 (enerojun. 2012), pp. 165-205.
• DE LONDRAS, F., “Saadi v. Italy. European Court of Human Rights Judgment on Deportations of Individuals outsider the protective zone of the European Conventio on Human Rights article 3”, American Journal of International Law, vol. 102, n. 3 (julio, 2008), pp. 616-622.
• DIPLA, H., “The Contribution of the European Court of Human Rights to the Absolute Ban of Torture: The Practice of Diplomatic Assurances”, en La Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme, un instrument vivant: mélanges en l’honneur de Christos L. Rozakis, édité par Dean Spielmann, Marialena Tsirli, Panayotis Voyatzis, Bruylant, Bruselas, 2011, pp. 155-179.
• DOURNEAU-JOSETTE, P., “Les conditions de détention et la CEDH: les droits fondamentaux à l’assaut des prisons”, Gazette du Palais, vol. 133, ns. 39-40, pp. 4-11.
• DUBOUT, E., “La procéduralisation des obligations relatives aux droits fondamentaux substantiels par la Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme”, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, n. 70 (2007), pp. 397-425.
• FERSCHTMAN, M., Prohibition of Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment under the European Convention on Human Rights (article 3), Interights manual for lawyers, Londres, 2009.
• FOURTEAU, H., L’application de l’Article 3 de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme dans le droit interne des Etats membres: l’impact des garanties européennes contre la torture et les traitements inhumains ou dégradants, LGDJ, Paris, 1996.
• FREEMAN, M., Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 2006.
• FRICERO, N., “Droit à un recours effectif: CEDH, 5 sect., 20 janv. 2011, n. 19606/08, Payet c. France”, Procédures: Revue mensuelle du JurisCalsseur, 2011, n. 3, pp. 44-45.
• GARCÍA, A. M., “Problemas constitucionales de la dignidad de la persona”, Persona y Derecho, n. 67, pp. 449-514.
• GENTILI, G., “European Court of Human Rights: An Absolute Ban on Deportation of Foreign Citizens to Countries where Torture or Ill-Treatment is a genuine risk”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 8, n. 2 (abril, 2010), pp. 311-322.
• GINBAR, Y., Why not Torture Terrorists? Moral, Practical and Legal Aspects of the “Ticking bomb” justification for torture, Oxford University
• GRABENWARTER, Ch., “The Right to Effective Remedy Against Excessive Duration of Proceedings”, The Protection of Human Rights at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Colloquium in Honour of Professor Dr. Dr. Dr. H. C. Mult. Georg Ress on the Occasion of his 75th Birthday, Jürgen Bröhmer (ed.), Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012, pp. 123-133.
• GUTIÉRREZ, I., La dignidad de la persona y derechos fundamentales, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2005.
• HAMPSON, F., “The Concept of an ‘Arguable Claim’ Under Article 13 of de European Convention on Human Rights”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 39, n. 4 (1990), pp. 891-899.
• HIGGINS, R., “Extradition, the Right to Life, and the Prohibition against Cruel and Inhuman Punishment and Treatment: Similarities and Differences under the ECHR and the ICCPR”, Protection des droits de l’homme: la perspective européenne, mélanges à la mémoire de Rolv Ryssdal, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln, 2000, pp. 605-615.
• HOTTELIER, M., “La nécessaire complémentarité des droits matériels et des garanties de procédure: (Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, 8 août 2006, H.M. c. Turquie)”, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, n. 70, pp. 573-586.
• KELSALL, T., “Truth, Lies, Ritual: Preliminary Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 27, n. 2 (2005), pp. 361-391.
• KIM, H. J., “Local, National and International Determinants of Truth Commission: The South Korean Experience”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 34, n. 3 (agosto, 2012), pp. 726-750.
• LAGERGREN, G., “Some Reflections on the Application of Article 6 §1 and Article 13 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”, Festskrift Till Lars Hjerner: Studies in International Law, Stockholm, 1990, pp. 313-326.
• LAPLANTE, L. J., “Truth with Consequences: Justice and Reparations in Post-Truth Commission Peru”, Human Rights Quartely, vol. 29, n. 1 (febrero 2007), pp. 228-250.
• MACÍAS, T., “Tortured bodies: The Biopolitics of Torture and Truth in Chile”, The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 17, n. 1 (enero, 2013), pp. 113-132.
• MARKO-STÖCKL, E., “My Truth, your Truth, our Truth?: The role of History Teaching and Truth Commissions for Reconciliation in Former Yugoslavia”, European Yearbook of Minority Issues, vol. 7 (2007/8), pp. 327-352.
• MAVRONICOLA, N., “What is an ‘Absolute Right’? Deciphering Absoluteness in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 12, n. 4 (2012), pp. 723-758.
• MAZZEI, J. M., “Finding Shame in Truth: The Importance of Public Engagement in Truth Commissions”, Human Rights Quarterly: a Comparative and International Journal of the Social Sciences, Humanities, and Law, vol. 33, n. 2 (mayo, 2011), pp. 431-452.
• MEGÍAS, J. J., “Dignidad y derechos humanos”, en MARTÍNEZ, N. y otros (coords.), Derechos humanos: problemas actuales, vol. I. Universitas, Madrid, 2013, pp. 57-74.
• MESSINEO, F., “Extraordinary Renditions and State Obligations to Criminalize and Prosecute Torture in the Light of the Abu Omar Case in Italy”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 7, n. 5 (2009), pp. 1023-1046.
• MURDOCH, J., “The Impact of the Council of Europe’s ‘Torture Committee’ and the Evolution of Standard-Setting in Relation to Places of Detention”, European Human Rights Law Review, 2 (2006), pp. 158-179.
• MUSSI, F., “Extraordinary renditions as Enforced Disappearances? The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights”, en Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, vol. 7, n. 2 (2013), pp. 365-377.
• NAPOLETANO, N., “Extraordinary renditions e detenzioni segrete alla luce degli strumenti di tutela dei diritti umani in Europa”, Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, vol. 1, n. 2 (2007), pp. 412-419.
• NAPOLETANO, N., “Extraordinary renditions, tortura, sparizioni forzate e ‘diritto alla verità’: alcune riflessioni sul caso El-Masri”, en Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, vol. 7, n. 2 (2013), pp. 331-364.
• NOWAK, M., “Torture and Conditions of Detention in the 21 st Century: 60 Recommendations to States and the United Nations after Six Years of Experience as the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture”, European Yearbook on Human Rights, 2011, pp. 549- 558.
• OLLERO, A., Derecho a la verdad. Valores para una sociedad pluralista, Eunsa, Navarra, 2005.
• ORREGO, F., “Dialogue for Reconciliation: A Supplementary Step for Truth Commissions”, Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese, edited by Lal Chand Vohrah et al., Kluwer Law International, La Haya, 2003, pp. 641-653.
• PASTOR, J. A., “La reciente jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Temas escogidos”, en QUEL, F. J. y ÁLVAREZ, J. J. (coord.), Cursos de Derecho internacional y Relaciones internacionales de Vitoria-Gazteiz, Servicio editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco, 2008, p. 251.
• PELSINGER, Sh., “Liberia’s Long Tail: How Web 2.0 is Changing and Challenging Truth Commissions”, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 10, n. 4 (2010), pp. 730-748.
• PFANNER, T., “Truth and Reconciliation Commissions”, International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 88, n. 862 (junio, 2006), pp. 221-373.
• PINTO, M. C. W., “Truth and Consequences or Truth and Reconciliation?: Some Thoughts on the Potential of Official Truth Commissions”, Man’s inhumanity to man: essays on international law in honour of Antonio Cassese, edited by Lal Chand Vohrah et al., Kluwer Law International, La Haya, 2003, pp. 693-728.
• PLESSIS, M., “Transitional Justice: A Future Truth Commission for Zimbabwe?”, International and ComparativeLlaw Quarterly, Libro Persona Derecho 69.indb 145 14/02/14 09:39 vol. 58, 1 (enero 2009), pp. 73-117.
• PRASANNA, T., “Taking Remedies Seriously: The Normative Implications of Risking Torture”, Columbia journal of transnational law, vol. 50, n. 2 (2012), pp. 370-441.
• PRIETO, T., La dignidad de la persona: núcleo de la moralidad y el orden públicos, límite al ejercicio de las libertades públicas, Civitas, Cizur Menor, 2010.
• QUINN, J. R., “Lessons learned: Practical Lessons Gleaned from Inside the Truth Commissions of Guatemala and South Africa”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 25, n. 4 (2003), pp. 1117-1149.
• ROUGET, D., “La Convention européenne pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants. Un outil essentiel de promotion de la dignité des personnes privées de liberté ”, Le Cahiers de l’Institut des droits de l’homme, n. 2, 1996, pp. 17-31.
• TALAVERA, P. “Historia de su nacimiento”, en MEGÍAS, J. J. (coord.), Manual de derechos humanos. Thomson-Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, 2006, pp. 57-76.
• THUNE, G. H., “The Tight to an Effective Remedy in Domestic Law: Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights”, Broadening the Frontiers of Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Asbjoern Eide, edited by Donna Gomien, Oslo, Scandinav. Univ. Press, 1993, pp. 79-124.
• TRUYOL, A., Los derechos humanos, Tecnos, Madrid, 2000.
• TWISS, S.B., “Torture, justification, and human rights: toward an absolute proscription”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 29, n. 2 (mayo, 2007), pp. 346-367.
• WANLIN, L. A., “Responsability for Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition: Holding European States to Account for Assisting in CIA Operations”, Cyprus Human Rights Law Review, vol. 2, n. 1 (2013), pp. 16-35.