Regulación frente a reputación como medio de salvaguardar la independencia de la auditoría

Referencias bibliográficas

• AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS [1978]: The Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities: Report, Conclusions and Recommendations, Cohen Commission, AICPA, New York.
• ARRUÑADA, B. y PAZ-ARES, C. [1997]: «Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination», International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 17, págs. 31-61.
• BALGATI, B. [2001]: The Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
• CARCELLO, J. V. y NAGY, A. [2004]: «Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting», Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), págs. 55-69.
• CRASWELL, A. T. [1988]: «The association between qualified opinions and auditor switches», Accounting and Business Research 19(73), págs. 23-31.
• DEANGELO, L. E. [1981a]: «Auditor independence, "low balling", and disclosure regulation», Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 3, n.º 2, págs. 113-127.
• DEANGELO, L. E. [1981b]: «Auditor size and audit quality», Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 3, n.º 3, págs. 183-199.
• DEFOND, M. L. y FRANCIS, J. R. [2005]: «Audit Research after Sarbanes-Oxley», Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory, vol. 24, págs. 5-30.
• DEFOND, M.; RAGHUNANDAN, K. y SUBRAMANYAN, K. [2002]: «Do non-audit services fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions», Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 40, págs. 1.247-1.274.
• DEIS, D. R. Jr. y GIROUX, G. A. [1992]: «Determinants of audit quality in the public sector», The Accounting Review, 67(3), págs. 462-479.
• DYE, R. A. [1991]: «Informationally motivated auditor replacement», Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14, págs. 347-374.
• FRANCIS, J. [2011]: «A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality», Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), págs. 125-152.
• FRANCIS, J. R. y KRISHNAN, J. [2002]: «Evidence on auditor risk-management strategies before and after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995», Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9, págs. 135-157.
• FRANCIS, J. R.; REICHELT, K. y WANG, D. [2005]: «The pricing of national and city specific reputation for Industry expertise in the US audit market», The Accounting Review, 80 (enero), págs. 113-136.
• GEIGER, M.; RAGHUNANDAN, K. y RAMA, D. V. [1998]: «Costs associated with going-concern modified audit opinions: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions, and client failures», Advances in Accounting, 16, págs. 117-139.
• GEIGER, M. y RAGHUNANDAN, K. [2002]: «Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures». Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), págs. 68-78.
• JOHNSTONE, K. M.; SUTTON, M. H. y WARFIELD, T. D. [2001]: «Antecedents and consequences of independence risk: Framework for analysis», Accounting Horizons, 15(1), págs. 1-18.
• KRISHNAN, J. y KRISHNAN, J. [1996]: «The role of economic tradeoffs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis», Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance 11(4), págs. 565-586.
• LENNOX, C. S. [2000]: «Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK», Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, págs. 321-337.
• MAUTZ, R. K. y SHARAF, H.A. [1961]: Philosophy of Auditing, Monograph, n.º 6, Evanston, IL, American Accounting Association, Sarasota.
• MCKEOWN, J.; MUTCHLER, J. y HOPWOOD, W. [1991]: «Towards an Explanation of Auditor Failure to Modify the Audit Opinions of Bankrupt Companies», Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Supplement.
• MONTERREY, J. y SÁNCHEZ-SEGURA, A. [2007]: «Rotación y dependencia económica de los auditores: sus efectos sobre la calidad del resultado en las compañías cotizadas españolas», Investigaciones Económicas, vol. 31, n.º 1, págs. 119-159.
• REYNOLDS, J. K. y FRANCIS, J. R. [2001]: «Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions», Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), págs. 375-400.
• ROMANO, R. [2005]: «The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance», The Yale Law Journal, vol. 114, págs. 1.521-611.
• SIMUNIC, D. y STEIN, M. [1987]: Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues, The Canadian Certified Accountants' Research Foundations, Vancouver.
• TEOH, S. H. [1992]: «Auditor independence, dismissal threats, and the market reaction to auditor switches». Journal of Accounting Research 30(1), págs. 1-23.
• WALLMAN, S. M. H. [1996]: «The future of accounting, part III: Reliability and auditor independence». Accounting Horizons, 10 (diciembre), págs. 76-97.
• ZMIJEWSKI, M. [1984]: «Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models». Journal of Accounting Research (suplemento), págs. 59-82.