The influence of gender on entrepreneurial intentionthe mediating role of perceptual factors

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Acs, Z., Arenius, P., Hay, M., Minniti, M., Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2004 Executive Report. 2005, London Business School, Babson College, London.
• Ahl, H., Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions?. Entrep. Theory Pract. 30:5 (2006), 595–621.
• Aidis, R., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T.M., Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Bus. Econ. 39:1 (2012), 119–139.
• Almeida-Couto, J.P., Borges-Tiago, M.T., Propensity for entrepreneurship among university students. Bus. Rev. 12:1 (2009), 308–316.
• Anna, A., Chandler, G., Jansen, E., Mero, N., Women business owners in traditional and non-traditional industries. J. Bus. Venturing 15:3 (2000), 279–303.
• Arano, K., Parker, C., Terry, R., Gender-based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. Econ. Inq. 48:1 (2010), 147–155.
• Arenius, P., De Clercq, D., A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Bus. Econ. 24 (2005), 249–265.
• Arenius, P., Kovalainen, A., Similarities and differences across the factors associated with women's self-employment preference in the Nordic countries. Int. Small Bus. J. 24:1 (2006), 31–59.
• Arenius, P., Minniti, M., Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 24 (2005), 233–247.
• Bandura, A., Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Dev. Psychol. 25:5 (1989), 729–735.
• Bandura, A., Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. Schwarzer, R., (eds.) Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, 1992, Hemisphere, Washington, DC.
• BarNir, A., Watson, W.E., Hutchins, H.M., Mediation and moderated mediation in the relationship among role models, self-efficacy, entrepreneurial career intention, and gender. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41:2 (2011), 270–297.
• Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51:6 (1986), 1173–1182.
• Baron, R.A., Ensley, M.D., Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Manage. Sci. 52:9 (2006), 1331–1344.
• Bird, B., Brush, C., A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrep. Theory Pract. 26:3 (2002), 41–65.
• Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A., Van De Bunt, G.G., How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. J. Bus. Venturing 25:3 (2010), 245–260.
• Boden, R.J. Jr., Nucci, A., On the survival prospects of men's and women's new business ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 15:4 (2000), 347–362.
• Boohene, R., Sheridan, A., Kotey, B., Gender, personal values, strategies and small business performance. A Ghanaian case study. Equal Opportun. Int. 27:3 (2008), 237–257.
• Boyd, N.G., Vozikis, G.S., The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurs. Entrep. Theory Pract. 18:4 (1994), 63–77.
• Buunk, A.P., Peiro, J.M., Griffioen, C., A positive role model may stimulate career-oriented behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 37 (2007), 1489–1500.
• Caliendo, M., Fossen, F.M., Krikos, A.S., Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs – new evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Bus. Econ. 32:2 (2009), 153–167.
• Carter, N.M., Williams, M.L., The case of new firm growth. New Perspect. Women Entrep. 3 (2003), 25–50.
• Casson, M., Wadeson, N., The discovery of opportunities: extending the economic theory of the entrepreneur. Small Bus. Econ. 28 (2007), 285–300.
• Chen, C.C., Greene, P.G., Crick, A., Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?. J. Bus. Venturing 3 (1998), 295–316.
• Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., Salter, A., The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 40:8 (2011), 1084–1093.
• Cooper, S.Y., Lucas, W.A., Developing entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intentions: lessons from two programmes. Proceedings of the 52nd ICSB World Conference, 2007.
• Cox, L., Mueller, S., Moss, S., The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Int. J. Entrep. Educ. 1:1 (2002), 229–245.
• Crant, J.M., The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. J. Small Bus. Manage. 34:3 (1996), 42–49.
• Davidsson, P., Honig, B., The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 18:3 (2003), 301–331.
• De Bruin, A., Brush, C.G., Welter, F., Advancing a framework for coherent research on women's entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31:3 (2007), 323–339.
• DeMartino, R., Barbato, R., Differences between women and men MBA entrepreneurs: exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators. J. Bus. Venturing 18:6 (2003), 815–832.
• DeTienne, D.R., Chandler, G.N., The role of gender in opportunity identification. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31:3 (2007), 365–386.
• Díaz, J.C., Mogollón, R.H., Sánchez-Escobedo, M.C., Jiménez, M.V., Actividad emprendedora y género: un estudio comparativo. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 19:2 (2010), 83–98.
• Díaz-García, M.C., Jiménez-Moreno, J., Entrepreneurial intention: the role of gender. Int. Entrep. Manage. J. 6:3 (2010), 261–283.
• Douglas, E.J., Shepherd, D.A., Self-employment as a career choice: attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrep. Theory Pract. 26:3 (2002), 81–90.
• Dyer, W.G. Jr., Toward a theory of entrepreneurial careers. Entrep. Theory Pract. 18:3 (1994), 7–21.
• Echabe, E.A., Gonzalez-Castro, J., The impact of context on gender social identities. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29 (1999), 287–304.
• Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?. J. Publ. Econ. 87:3–4 (2003), 681–701.
• Ettl, K., Welter, F., Gender, context and entrepreneurial learning. Int. J. Gender Entrep. 2:2 (2010), 108–129.
• Evald, M.R., Klyver, K., Christensen, P.R., The effect of human capital, social capital and perceptual values on nascent entrepreneurs’ export intention. J. Int. Entrep. 9:1 (2011), 1–19.
• Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., Lassas-Clerc, N., Towards a new methodology to assess the entrepreneurship teaching programmes. Fayolle, A., (eds.) Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education, vol. 1, 2007, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 187–197.
• Fischer, E.M., Reuber, A.R., Dyke, L.S., A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender, and entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 8:2 (1993), 151–168.
• Florin, J., Karri, R., Rossiter, N., Fostering entrepreneurial drive in business education: an attitudinal approach. J. Manage. Educ. 31:1 (2007), 17–42.
• Fuentes-García, J.F., Sánchez-Cañizares, M.S., Análisis del perfil emprendedor: una perspectiva de género. Estudios de Economía Aplicada 28:3 (2010), 1–28.
• Gatewood, E.J., Shaver, K.G., Gartner, W.B., A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. J. Bus. Venturing 10:5 (1995), 371–391.
• Gatewood, E.J., Shaver, K.G., Powers, J.B., Gartner, W.B., Entrepreneurial expectancy, task effort, and performance. Entrep. Theory Pract. 27:2 (2002), 187–206.
• González-Álvarez, N., Solís-Rodríguez, V., Discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities: a gender perspective. Indus. Manage. Data 111:5 (2011), 755–775.
• Greene, P.G., Hart, M.M., Gatewood, E.J., Brush, C.G., Carter, N.M., Women entrepreneurs: moving front and center: an overview of research and theory. Coleman White Paper Series 3 (2003), 1–47.
• Greer, M.J., Greene, P.G., Feminist theory and the study of entrepreneurship. Butler, J., (eds.) New Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs, 2003, IAP, Greenwich, CT, 1–24.
• Györfy, L., Socio-demographic and perceptional factors influencing early-stage entrepreneurship in Romania. Közgazdász Fórum Econ. Bus. 17:121 (2014), 41–56.
• Gupta, V.K., Goktan, A.B., Gunay, G., Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: a stereotype threat perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 29:2 (2014), 273–288.
• Heilman, M.E., Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. Res. Org. Behav. 5 (1983), 269–298.
• Indarti, N., Rostiani, R., Nastiti, T., Underlying factors of entrepreneurial intention among Asian students. South East Asian J. Manage. 4:2 (2010), 143–159.
• Jennings, J.E., McDougald, M.S., Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32:3 (2007), 747–760.
• Johnsen, G.L., McMahon, R.G., Owner-manager gender, financial performance and business growth amongst SMEs from Australia's business longitudinal survey. Int. Small Bus. J. 23:2 (2005), 115–142.
• Jones, K., Tullous, R., Behaviors of pre-venture entrepreneurs and perceptions of their financial needs. J. Small Bus. Manage. 40:3 (2002), 233–248.
• Kalleberg, A.L., Leicht, K.T., Gender and organizational performance: determinants of small business survival and success. Acad. Manage. J. 34:1 (1991), 136–161.
• Kennedy, P., A Guide to Econometrics. 1992, MIT Cambridge Press, MA.
• Kepler, E., Shane, S., Are Male and Female Entrepreneurs Really that Different?. 2007, Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
• Kickul, J., Wilson, F., Marlino, D., Barbosa, S.D., Are misalignments of perceptions and self-efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intention among our nation's teens?. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 5:2 (2008), 321–335.
• Kirkwood, J., Is a lack of self-confidence hindering women entrepreneurs?. Int. J. Gender Entrep. 1:2 (2009), 118–133.
• Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., Schade, C., I think I can, I think I can…: a study of entrepreneurial behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. 28 (2007), 502–527.
• Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., Schade, C., Gender differences in entrepreneurial propensity. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 75:2 (2013), 213–234.
• Kolvereid, L., Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrep. Theory Pract. 21:1 (1996), 47–57.
• Kuratko, D.F., The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrep. Theory Pract. 29:5 (2005), 577–598.
• Kwong, C.Y., Thompson, P., Jones-Evans, D., Brooksbank, D., Nascent entrepreneurial activity within female ethnic minority groups. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 15:2 (2009), 262–281.
• Langowitz, N., Minniti, M., The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31:3 (2007), 341–364.
• Laviolette, E.M., Lefebvre, M.R., Brunel, O., The impact of story bound entrepreneurial role models on self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 18:6 (2012), 720–742.
• Lefkowitz, J., Sex related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: now you see them…. Acad. Manage. J. 37:2 (1994), 323–349.
• Levesque, M., Minniti, M., The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. J. Bus. Venturing 21:2 (2006), 177–194.
• Liñán, F., Santos, F.J., Does social capital affect entrepreneurial intentions?. Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 13:4 (2007), 443–453.
• Liñán, F., Santos, F.J., Fernández, J., The influence of perceptions on entrepreneurial intention. Int. Entrep. Manage. J. 7 (2011), 373–390.
• Malach-Pines, A., Schwartz, D., Now you see them, now you don't: gender differences in Entrepreneurship. J. Manage. Psychol. 23:7 (2008), 811–832.
• Markman, G.D., Baron, R.A., Balkin, D.B., Are perseverance and self-efficacy costless? Assessing entrepreneurs’ regretful thinking. J. Org. Behav. 26 (2005), 1–19.
• Matthews, C.H., Moser, S.B., A longitudinal investigation of the impact of family background and gender on interest in small firms ownership. J. Small Bus. Manage.(April), 1996, 29–43.
• Minniti, M., Gender issues in entrepreneurship. Found. Trends Entrep. 5:7–8 (2009), 497–621.
• Minniti, M., Arenius, P., Langowitz, N., 2004 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Special Topic Report: Women and Entrepreneurship. 2005, Center for Women's Leadership at Babson College, Babson Park, MA.
• Minniti, M., Bygrave, W., A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrep.: Theory Pract. 25:3 (2001), 5–16.
• Minniti, M., Nardone, C., Being in someone's shoes: the role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 28 (2007), 223–238.
• Mirchandani, K., Feminist insight on gendered work: new directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender Work Org. 6:4 (1999), 224–235.
• Moore, D., Buttner, H., Women Entrepreneurs: Moving Beyond the Glass Ceiling. 1997, Thousand Oaks, California.
• Mueller, S.L., Dato-On, M.C., Gender-role orientation as a determinant of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. J. Dev. Entrep. 13:1 (2008), 3–20.
• Mueller, S.L., Dato-On, M.C., A cross cultural study of gender-role orientation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Int. Entrep. Manage. J. 9:1 (2013), 1–20.
• Neelakantan, U., Estimation and impact of gender differences in risk tolerance. Econ. Inq. 48:1 (2010), 228–233.
• Ozgen, E., Baron, R.A., Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. J. Bus. Venturing 22:2 (2007), 174–192.
• Parker, S.C., The Economics of Self-employment and Entrepreneurship. 2004, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Peterman, N.E., Kennedy, J., Enterprise education: influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 28:2 (2003), 129–144.
• Powell, M., Ansic, D., Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision making: an experimental analysis. J. Econ. Psychol. 18 (1997), 605–628.
• Reynolds, P.D., National panel study of U.S. business start-ups: background and methodology. Katz, A.J., (eds.) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 2000, JAI Press, Stanford, CT, 153–227.
• Reynolds, P.D., Camp, S.M., Bygrave, W.D., Autio, E., Hay, M., Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – 2001 Executive Report. 2001, Babson College, IBM, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership and London Business School, London.
• Reynolds, P.D., Camp, S.M., Bygrave, W.D., Autio, E., Hay, M., Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – 2002 Executive Report. 2002, Babson College, IBM, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership and London Business School, London.
• Robb, A.M., Watson, J., Gender differences in firm performance: evidence from new ventures in the United States. J. Bus. Venturing 27:5 (2012), 544–558.
• Roszkowski, M.J., Grable, J., Gender stereotypes in advisors’ clinical judgments of financial risk tolerance: objects in the mirror are closer than they appear. J. Behav. Finance 6:4 (2005), 181–191.
• Routamaa, V., Hautala, T., Rissanen, A., Hunting for female entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial capacity and gender. Proceedings from 2004 ICSB World Conference, 2004.
• Sexton, D.L., Bowman-Upton, N., Female and male entrepreneurs: psychological characteristics and their role in gender-related discrimination. J. Bus. Venturing 5:1 (1990), 29–36.
• Shaver, K.G., Gartner, W.B., Crosby, E., Bakalarova, K., Gatewood, E.J., Attributions about entrepreneurship: a framework and process for analyzing reasons for starting a business. Entrep. Theory Pract. 26:2 (2001), 5–32.
• Shinnar, R.S., Giacomin, O., Jansen, F., Entrepreneurial perceptions and intention: the role of gender and culture. Entrep. Theory Pract. 36:3 (2012), 465–493.
• Siegrist, M., Cvetckovich, G., Gutscher, H., Risk preference predictions and gender stereotypes. Org. Behav. Human Decis. Process. 87:1 (2002), 91–102.
• Stephan, P.E., El-Ganainy, A., The entrepreneurial puzzle: explaining the gender gap. J. Technol. Transfer 32 (2007), 475–487.
• Tan, J., Breaking the ‘bamboo curtain’ and the ‘glass ceiling’: the experience of women entrepreneurs in high-tech industries in an emerging market. J. Bus. Ethics 8 (2008), 547–564.
• Trevelyan, R., Self-efficacy and effort in new venture development. J. Manage. Org. 17:1 (2011), 2–16.
• Van Gelderen, M., Brand, M., Van Praag, M., Bodewes, W., Poutsma, E., Van Gils, A., Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behavior. Career Dev. Int. 13:6 (2008), 538–559.
• Veciana, J.M., Aponte, M., Urbano, D., University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: a two countries comparison. Int. Entrep. Manage. J. 1:2 (2005), 165–182.
• Venkataraman, S., The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Adv. Entrep. Firm Emerg. Growth 3:1 (1997), 119–138.
• Verheul, I., Thurik, R., Start-up capital: does gender matter?. Small Bus. Econ. 16:4 (2001), 329–346.
• Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L., Thurik, R., Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image. J. Bus. Venturing 20:4 (2005), 483–518.
• Wagner, J., What a difference a Y makes-female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. Small Bus. Econ. 28 (2007), 1–21.
• Wang, C.K., Wong, P.K., Entrepreneurial interest of university students in Singapore. Technovation 24:2 (2004), 163–172.
• Wang, C., Wong, P., Lu, Q., Tertiary education and entrepreneurial intention. Phan, P., (eds.) Technological Entrepreneurship, 2002, IAP, Greenwich, CT, 55–82.
• Watson, J., Robinson, S., Adjusting for risk in comparing the performances of male- and female-controlled SMEs. J. Bus. Venturing 18:6 (2003), 773–788.
• Wilson, F., Kickul, J., Marlino, D., Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intention: implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrep. Theory Pract. 31:3 (2007), 387–406.
• Wilson, F., Kickul, J., Marlino, D., Barbosa, S.D., Griffiths, M.D., An analysis of the role of gender and self-efficacy in developing female entrepreneurial interest and behaviour. J. Dev. Entrep. 14:2 (2009), 105–119.
• Yordanova, D.I., Tarrazon, M.A., Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: evidence from Bulgaria. J. Dev. Entrep. 15:03 (2010), 245–261.
• Zhao, H., Scott, E.S., Hills, G.E., The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intention. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:6 (2005), 1265–1272.
• Zhao, H., Seibert, S.E., Lumpkin, G.T., The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intention and performance: a meta-analytic review. J. Manage. 36:2 (2010), 381–404.