El efecto de la distancia económica sobre la colaboración científica entre universidadesevidencia para las regiones del sur de Europa

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abbasi, A., y Jaafari, A. (2013): «Research Impact and Scholars’ Geographical Diversity», Journal of Informetrics, 7, 683-693.
• Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., y Di Costa, F. (2009): «Research Collaboration and Productivity: Is There Correlation?», Higher Education, 57, 155-171.
• Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., y León, M. D. (2011): «Factors Affecting Inter-regional Academic Scientific Collaboration within Europe: the Role of Economic Distance», Scientometrics, 87, 63-74.
• Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., y León, M. D. (2014): «Regional Scientific Production and Specialization in Europe: The Role of HERD», European Planning Studies, 22, 949-974.
• Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., y Stephan, P. E. (2005): «Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999», Research Policy, 34, 259-285.
• Aghion, P., y Howitt, P. (1992): «A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction», Econometrica, 60, 323-351.
• Aghion, P., y Howitt, P (1998): Endogenous Growth, Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press.
• Anselin, L., Varga, A., y Acs, Z. (1997): «Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations», Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422-448.
• Balland, P. A. (2011): «Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry», Regional Studies, 46, 741-756.
• Barjak, F., y Robinson, S. (2008): «International Collaboration, Mobility and Team Diversity in the Life Sciences: Impact on Research Performance», Social Geography, 3(1), 23-38.
• Boschma, R. A. (2005): «Proximity and Innovation: A critical Assessment», Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
• Boschma, R. A., y Frenken, K. (2009): «Some Notes on Institutions in Evolutionary Economic Geography», Journal of Economic Geography, 85(2), 151-158.
• Bozeman, B., y Corley, E. (2004): «Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital», Research Policy, 33, 599-616.
• Broström, A. (2010): «Working with Distant Researchers: Distance and Content in University-industry Interaction», Reseach Policy, 39, 1311-1320.
• Cameron, A., y Trivedi, P. (2009): Microeconometrics using stata, College Station, Texas, Stata Press.
• Cameron, A., y Trivedi, P. (2013): Regression analysis of count data, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Carrincazeaux, C., Lung, Y., y Vicente, J. (2008): «The Scientific Trajectory of the French School of Proximity: Interaction- and Institution-based Approaches to Regional Innovation Systems», European Planning Studies, 16(5), 617-628.
• Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas (2007): Comunicación de la Comisión al Consejo Europeo. Informe Estratégico sobre la Estrategia de Lisboa Renovada para el Crecimiento y el Empleo: Lanzamiento del Nuevo Ciclo (2008-2010). COM (2007) 803 final. Bruselas, http:////eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3Ac11806 (último acceso: abril 2015).
• Cummings, J. N., y Kiesler, S. (2007): «Coordination Costs and Project Outcomes in Multi-university Collaborations», Research Policy, 36, 1620-1634.
• Defazio, D., Lockett, A., y Wright, M. (2009): «Funding Incentives, Collaborative Dynamics and Scientific Productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program», Research Policy, 38, 293-305.
• European Commission (2010): «EUMIDA Report: Feasibility Study for Creating a European University Data Collection. Final Study Report. Contract N° RTD/C/C4/2009/0233402», en http:////ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/eumida-final-report.pdf (último acceso: noviembre 2014).
• Fernández, A., Ferrándiz, E., y León, M. D. (2016): «Proximity Dimensions and Scientific Collaboration among Academic Institutions in Europe: The Closer, the Better», Sciento-metrics, 106(3), 1073-1092.
• Franceschet, M., y Costantini, A. (2010): «The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers», Journal of Informetrics, 4, 540-553.
• Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., y Hoekman, J. (2009): «Spatial Scientometrics: Towards a Cumulative Research Program», Journal of Informetrics, 3, 222-232.
• Foray, D. (2004): The economics of Knowledge, Cambridge (Massachusetts), The MIT Press.
• Gaillard, J. (1992): «Use of publication lists to study scientific production and strategies of scientists in developing countries», Scientometrics, 23(1), 57-73.
• García-Velasco, M. M., y Delgado-Márquez, B. L. (2016): «¿Contribuyen los fondos estructurales a la configuración de la base de conocimiento en Europa? Análisis a través de un índice sintético», Investigaciones Regionales, 34, 175-199.
• Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., y Van den Oord, A. (2008): «Net-work Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density», Research Policy 37, 1717-1731.
• Hennemann, S., Rybski, D., y Liefner, I. (2012): «The Myth of Global Science Collaboration-Collaboration Patterns in Epistemic Communities», Journal of Informetrics, 6, 217-225.
• Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., y Oort, F. (2009): «The Geography of Collaborative KnowledgeProduction in Europe», Annals of Regional Science, 43, 721-738.
• Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., y Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010): «Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration within Europe», Research Policy, 39, 662-673.
• Hoekman, J., Scherngell, T., Frenken, K., y Tijssen, R. (2012): «Acquisition of European Resarch Funds and its Effect on International Scientific Collaboration», Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 23-52.
• Hong, W., y Su, Y. S. (2013): «The Effect of Institutional Proximity in Non-local University-industry Collaborations: An Analysis Based on Chinese Patent Data», Research Policy, 42, 454-464.
• Howells, J. (2005): «Innovation and Regional Economic Development: A Matter of Perspective?», Research Policy, 34(8), 1220-1234.
• Hwang, K. (2008): «International Collaboration in Multilayered Center-Periphery in the Globalization of Science and Technology», Science Technology Human Values, 33, 101-133.
• Jaffe, A. (1989): «Real Effects of Academic Research», American Economic Review, 79, 957-970.
• Katz, J. S. (1994): «Geographical Proximity and Scientific Collaboration», Scientometrics, 31(1), 31-43.
• Katz, J. S., y Martin, B. R. (1997): «What Is Research Collaboration?», Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
• Lakitan, B., Hidayat, D., y Herlinda, S. (2012): «Scientific Productivity and the Collaboration Intensity of Indonesian Universities and Public R&D Institutions: Are There Dependencies on Collaborative R&D with Foreign Institutions?», Technology in Society, 34, 227-238.
• Lee, S., y Bozeman, B. (2005): «The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity», Social Studies of Science, 35, 673-702.
• Long, J. S. (1997): Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
• Lucas, J. R. C. (1988): «On the mechanics of economic develpment», Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
• Maggioni, M., y Uberti, T. (2009): «Knowledge Networks across Europe: Which Distance Matters?», The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 691-720.
• Moreno, R., Royuela, V., y Vayá, E. (2005): «Monitoring the Lisbon Strategy’s Targets», Investigaciones Regionales, 7, 155-192.
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., y Silverman, B. S. (1996): «Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowlege Transfer», Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., y Silverman, B. S (1998): «Technological Overlap and Interfirm Cooperation: Implications for the Resouce-based View of the Firm», Research Policy, 27, 507-523.
• Mowery, D. C., y Sampat, B. N. (2004): «Universities in National Innovation Systems», en Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., y Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Niedergassel, B., y Leker, J. (2011): «Different Dimensions of Knowledge in Cooperative R&D Projects of University Scientists», Technovation, 31, 142-150.
• Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., y Van Den Oord, A. (2007): «Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity», Research Policy, 36, 1016-1034.
• Olson, G. M., y Olson, J. S. (2000): «Distance Matters», Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139-178.
• Paci, R., y Usai, S. (2009): «Knowledge Flows across European Regions», The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 669-690.
• Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011): «The Impact of Technological Relatedness, Prior Ties, and Geographical Distance on University-industry Collaborations: A Joint-patent Analysis», Technovation, 31, 309-319.
• Plotnikova, T., y Rake, B. (2014): «Collaboration in Pharmaceutical Research: Exploration of Country-level Determinants», Scientometrics, 98, 1173-1202.
• Ponds, R., Van Oort, F. G., y Frenken, K. (2007): «The Geographical and Institutional Proximity of Research Collaboration», Papers in Regional Science, 86, 423-443.
• Rallet, A., y Torre, A. (1999): «Is Geographical Proximity Necessary in the Innovation Networks in the Era of the Global Economy», GeoJournal, 49, 373-380.
• Romer, P. (1986): «Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth», Journal of Political Econommy, 94, 1002-1037.
• Romer, P (1990): «Endogenous Technological Change», Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
• Salager-Meyer, F. (2008): «Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future», Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 7, 121-132.
• Scherngell, T., y Barber, M. J. (2009): «Spatial Interaction Modelling of Cross-region RD Collaborations: Empirical Evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme», Papers in Regional Science, 88, 531-546.
• Scherngell, T., y Barber, M. (2011): «Distinct Spatial Characteristics of Industrial and Public Research Collaborations: Evidence from the Fifth EU Framework Programme», The Annals of Regional Science, 46, 247-266.
• Scherngell, T., y Hu, Y. (2010): «Collaborative Knowledge Production in China: Regional Evidence from a Gravity Model Approach», Regional Studies, 45, 755-772.
• Schubert, T., y Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010): «Can the Centre-periphery Model Explain Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration among Threshold and Industrialised Countries? The Case of South Africa and Germany», Scientometrics, 83, 181-203.
• Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007): Scientific Collaboration: a Synthesis of Challenges and Strategies, en: Cronin, B. (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 41. Medford NJ, Information Today, Inc.
• Tijssen, R. J. W, y Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2003): «Bibliometric Analyses of World Science», Extended Technical Annex to Chapter 5 of the Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators.
• Torre, A., y Gilly, J. P. (2000): «On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics», Regional Studies, 34, 169-180.
• Torres-Salinas, D., Delgado-López-Cozar, E., García-Moreno, J., y Herrera, F. (2011): «Rankings ISI de las Universidades Españolas según Campos Científicos: Descripción y Resultados» (2.a ed.), en http:////rankinguniversidades.es/ (último acceso: febrero 2014).