La producción científica sobre la innovación social para el desarrollo local. Una revisión bibliométricaLa estructura y la evolución del campo de dominio científico

  1. Pérez González, María del Carmen 1
  2. Lutsak Yaroslava, Natalia Vladimirovna 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

  2. 2 Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja
    info

    Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja

    Loja, Ecuador

    ROR https://ror.org/04dvbth24

Journal:
Prisma Social: revista de investigación social

ISSN: 1989-3469

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: Investigar lo Local: Reflexiones, Métodos y Casos de Estudio

Issue: 19

Pages: 146-182

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Prisma Social: revista de investigación social

Abstract

In the knowledge age, local development is directly related to the ability of territories to meet the challenges of a globalized and competitive world. Social innovation which is primarily based on the use of endogenous resources is one of the key ways through which this ability finds its expression. Although studies on this phenomenon – which can take different forms depending on the economic, cultural and social characteristics and conditions of each territory – are recent, because of their practical impact the interest of researchers around the world is increasing at a high rate. This research, using bibliometric analysis techniques, focuses on the field of existing scientific production centered on explaining how Social Innovation is produced and how it contributes to the territorial development. As one of the results of the study, four thematic groups have been identified – Social Economy, Local Government, Strengthening territorial capacities and Theoretical Development of Social and Territorial Innovation – what generates practical and theoretical impact in the field of research on the local development, making so a contribution to the scientific progress on the issue.

€ View funding

Funding information

La participación de esta autora en esta investigación ha sido financiada por la Secretaria Nacional de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SENESCYT) de Ecuadador mediante la adjudicación de la beca del Programa para estudios de Doctorado (PhD) para docentes de Universidades y de Escuelas Politécnicas.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Ansell, C. (2000). The networked polity: Regional development in Western Europe. Governance, 13(3).
  • Asián, R., Ernández, M. T., & Montes, Ó. (2013). Más allá de la RSC. Hacia un nuevo paradigma de desarrollo a través de la Innovación Social. Prisma Social. Revista de ciencias sociales, 10, 0-30.
  • Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How Social Innovation «Came to Be»: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635-653. http://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941600009X
  • Banyai, C., & Fleming, D. (2016). Collective impact capacity building: Finding gold in Southwest Florida. Community Development, 47(2). http://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1135174
  • Barth, S., Barraket, J., Luke, B., & McLaughlin, J. (2015). Acquaintance or partner? Social economy organizations, institutional logics and regional development in Australia. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 27(3-4). http://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1030458
  • Boisier, S. (2001). Desarrollo (local): ¿De qué estamos hablando? Transformaciones globales, Instituciones y Politicas de Desarrollo local, 21. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4
  • Bristow, G. (2010a). Critical Reflections on Regional Competitiveness: Theory, Policy, Practice. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203865408
  • Bristow, G. (2010b). Resilient regions: Re-’place’ing regional competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1). http://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp030
  • Buckland, H. (2014). La Innovación Social en América Latina. Marco conceptual y agentes. Barcelona, España: Instituto de Innovación Social de ESADE y Fondo Multilateral de Inversiones (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo).
  • Burroni, L. (2014). Competitive regionalism and the territorial governance of uncertainty. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 20(1). http://doi.org/10.1177/1024258913515159
  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 42-51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
  • Carvalho, J. (2017). Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship: The case of Porto Region. Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2-4(2). http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1923-2.ch036
  • Cunha, J., Benneworth, P., & Oliveira, P. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation: A conceptual distinction. Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vol. 4-4). http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1923-2.ch069
  • Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2016). VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden; CWTS.
  • Edwards-Schachter, M., Matti, C., & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering Quality of Life through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672-692. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00588.x
  • Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. (2017). «Shaken, but not stirred»: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 119, 64-79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012
  • Evers, A., Ewert, B., & Brandsen, T. (Eds.). (2014). Social Innovations por Social Cohesion. Transnational patterns and approaches from 20 European cities. Liege, Belgium: WILCO Consortium.
  • Franz, H.-W., & Howaldt, J. (Eds.). (2012). Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society (Vol. 9783642328). Dortmund, Germany: Social Research Centre TU Dortmund. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_11
  • Geddes, M. (2000). Tackling social exclusion in the European Union? The limits to the new orthodoxy of local partnership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4).
  • Have, R., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
  • Healey, P. (2015). Citizen-generated local development initiative: recent English experience. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 19(2). http://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.989892
  • Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2014). Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends (Vol. 5). Dormund, Germany. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2767
  • Hubert, A. (2010). Empowering people, driving change. Social innovation in the European Union. Bepa, (May), 1-172. http://doi.org/10.2796/13155
  • Jürgen, H., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2016). Social Innovation: Towards a New Innovation Paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 20-44.
  • Kim, D., & Lim, U. (2017). Social enterprise as a catalyst for sustainable local and regional development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8). http://doi.org/10.3390/su9081427
  • Klein, J.-L., & Tremblay, P.-A. (2013). The social economy: A springboard for local development projects? En Innovation and the Social Economy: The Quebec Experience.
  • Kneebone, E., & Berube, A. (2013). Confronting suburban poverty in America. Confronting Suburban Poverty in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (O. Neurath, Ed.). Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
  • MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J., & Vicari Haddock, S. (2012). Social Innovation and Territorial Development. London, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Meert, H., Mistiaen, P., & Kesteloot, C. (1997). The geography of survival: Household strategies in urban settings. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88(2).
  • Moore, M.-L. (2012). The Loop, the Lens, and the Lesson: Using Resilience Theory to Examine Public Policy and Social Innovation. Social innovation, (January), 89-113. http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367098
  • Moulaert, F., & Christiaens, E. (2010). The end of social innovation in urban development strategies?: The case of BOM in Antwerp. En Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation. London, UK: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849132
  • Moulaert, F., & Mehmood, A. (2008). Analysing regional development: From territorial innovation to path-dependent geography. The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, 607-631. http://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478545.00055
  • Moulaert, F., & Mehmood, A. (2010). Analysing regional development and policy: A structural-realist approach. Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 44 (01), 103-118.
  • Moulaert, F., & Nussbaumer, J. (2005). The Social Region. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(1), 45-64. http://doi.org/10.1177/0969776405048500
  • Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302. http://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
  • Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., Martinelli, F., & Gonzalez, S. (2010). Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation. London, UK: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849132
  • Moulaert, F., Van Dyck, B., Khan, A. Z., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Building a Meta-Framework to ‘Address’ Spatial Quality. International Planning Studies, 18(3-4), 389-409. http://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2013.837137
  • Mulgan, G. (2012a). Social Innovation Theories: Can Theory Catch Up with Practice? En F. Hans-Werner, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge Social Innovation (p. 19). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4
  • Mulgan, G. (2012b). The Theoretical Foundations of Social Innovation. En Social Innovation (pp. 33-65). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367098_2
  • Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. Young Fundation, 30(8), 224. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030166
  • Negro, G. (2013). Las empresas sociales de inserción frente a la exclusión social. Prisma Social. Revista de ciencias sociales, (9), 285-310.
  • Nevado, M. T., Gallardo, D., & Sánchez, M. I. (2013). La administración local y su implicación en la creación de una cultura socialmente responsable. Prisma Social. Revista de ciencias sociales, 10, 64-118.
  • Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pérez, C., & Jiménez, M. (2012). Dinámica territorial y economía social: una reflexión con especial referencia a Andalucía ante los cambios sociales. Revista de estudios empresariales, 1, 40-58. Recuperado a partir de http://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/REE/article/view/650
  • Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, N., & Eck, N. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
  • Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship : A Systematic Review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428-461. http://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063
  • Picciotti, A. (2017). Towards Sustainability: The Innovation Paths of Social Enterprise. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(2). http://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12168
  • Pigg, K., Gasteyer, S., Martin, K., Apaliyah, G., & Keating, K. (2015). Community effects of leadership development education: Citizen empowerment for civic engagement. West Virginia University Press.
  • Price, D. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press. New York, USA. http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f633f6
  • Raderstrong, J., & Boyea-Robinson, T. (2016). The why and how of working with communities through collective impact. Community Development, 47(2). http://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1130072
  • Rao-Nicholson, R., Vorley, T., & Khan, Z. (2017). Social innovation in emerging economies : A national systems of innovation based approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 121, 228-237. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.013
  • Rees, N. (1997). Inter-regional cooperation in the EU and beyond. European Planning Studies, 5(3).
  • Scott-Cato, M., & Hillier, J. (2010). How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzean philosophy to Transition Towns. Environmental Politics, 19(6). http://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.518677
  • Seyfang, G. (2010). Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 38(12). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.027
  • Shin, C. (2016). A conceptual approach to the relationships between the social economy, social welfare, and social innovation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 7(2). http://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2015-0027
  • TEPSIE. (2014). Social Innovation Theory and Research: A guide for researchers. A deliverable of the project: «The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe» (TEPSIE), European Commission– 7th Framework Programme, 46.
  • Thierstein, A., & Walser, M. (1997). The future ahead? Sustainable development for rural areas | Hoffnung am Horizont? - Nachhaltige Entwicklung im landlichen Raum. Zeitschrift fur Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung, 38(5).
  • Torres-Valdés, R., & Campillo, C. (2013). Desarrollo local y relaciones públicas para grupos desfavorecidos en la Comunidad de Madrid. Prisma Social. Revista de ciencias sociales, 10, 394-432.
  • Turner, M. (2017). Beyond People versus Place: A Place-Conscious Framework for Investing in Housing and Neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 27(2). http://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2016.1164739
Data source: Dialnet