Auditoría de la cirugía de catarata senil en Cádizresultados visuales y complicaciones

  1. L. Royo-Dujardin
  2. E. Alcalde-Vílchez
  3. E. Rodríguez-de la Rúa
  4. J.P. Novalbos-Ruiz
Revista:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 93

Número: 6

Páxinas: 274-282

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.OFTAL.2017.12.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Resumo

Objective To publish the outcomes and complications of age-related cataract surgery in Cadiz (Spain). Due to the lack of national audits, a comparison was made between the results obtained here and those of the most recent European audit, EUREQUO (2013), and the British audit RCOphth NOD (2015). Methods A prospective, longitudinal, before-after study of 312 patients undergoing cataract surgery in the University Hospitals of Puerta del Mar and Puerto Real (Cadiz), in 2013-14. Outcome measurements included sociodemographic characteristics, visual acuity (VA), symptoms secondary to cataract, ocular comorbidity, waiting time, expertise of surgeon (consultant vs. trainee), rate and type of surgical complications. Results The median age at surgery was 73.92 ± 7.31. Almost all (98.3%) of patients at consultation had a VA ≥ 0.60 logMAR, with a mean pre-surgical VA of 1.01 logMAR (0.92-1.10). There was a 6.7% complication rate, with 3.8% posterior capsule ruptures and 2.8% corneal decompensations. No cases of endophthalmitis occurred. The mean post-operative VA was 0.28 logMAR (0.22-0.33). More than three-quarters (78.8%) of cases achieved a post-operative VA ≤ 0.3 logMAR, and 27.6% of cases achieved a VA ≤ 0.0 logMAR. Conclusions Our success rate was inferior to the EUREQUO and RCOphth NOD studies, with the percentage of patients acquiring a postoperative VA ≤ 0.3 logMAR being 98% and 89%, respectively. However, the populations were not comparable. It is hoped that this study will encourage other public hospitals in Spain to undertake audits and share their results, in order to provide a tool for constructive criticism and quality improvement initiatives.