Consideraciones sobre la polivalencia del término asociación desde la perspectiva neurocognitiva del léxico

  1. Varo Varo, Carmen
Journal:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 13

Pages: 157-166

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2018.9201 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

Abstract

The concepts of association and associative are present in lexical studies since the dawn of modern linguistics. They have been the subject of multiple conceptual interpretations but not without problems. Both conceptions of associative relationship as a connection between the two psychological faces of the linguistic sign and as in absentia relationships coexist, especially in Linguistics dictionaries, with the interpretation (almost opposite) as connotation or, in other words, as a sense relationship which lies outside of word meaning. In contrast, current advances in the neurocognitive research of the lexicon, which have contributed to the reconstruction of the semantic system from a cerebral perspective, lead us necessarily to a new interpretation of these notions that is transferred from the word level to its formal and semantic traits.

Bibliographic References

  • Bally, C. (1940). “L’arbitraire du signe. Valeur et signification”. Le Français Moderne, 8/3, 93-206.
  • Casas Gómez, M. (2002). Los niveles del significar. Documentos de Investigación Lingüística, 7. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.
  • Casas Gómez, M., Hummel, M. (2017). Semántica léxica. Volumen monográfico de Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, 33/3. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
  • Coseriu, E. (1977). Principios de semántica estructural. Madrid: Gredos.
  • Cree, G. S., McRae, K., McNorgan, C. (1999). “An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: simulating semantic priming”. Cognitive Science, 23/3, 371-414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2303_4
  • Fischler, I., Goodman, G. O. (1978). “Latency of associative facilitation in memory”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.455
  • Garagnani, M., Pulvermüller, F. (2016). “Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: a neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs”. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43/6: 721-737. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13145
  • Geckeler, H. (1976). Semántica estructural y teoría del campo léxico. Madrid, Gredos.
  • Geckeler, H. (1981). “Structural Semantics”, Eikmeyer, H.-J./ Rieser, H. (eds.). Words, worlds, and contexts. New approaches in word semantics. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 381-414. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110842524-017
  • Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: a Neuropsychological Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kiefer, M., Pulvermüller, F. (2012). “Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions”. Cortex, 48, 805-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
  • Kruesi, E. E. (1978). The role of association and semantic similarity in facilitating the lexical decision. PhD. Dissertation. University of California.
  • Lamb, S. (1999). Pathways of the brain. The neurocognitive basis of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.170
  • Lamb, S., Webster, J. (ed.) (2004). Language and reality: selected writings of Sydney Lamb. London: Continuum International Publishing.
  • McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D. (1985). “Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.114.2.159
  • Plaut, D. C. (2003). “Connectionist modelling of language: examples and implications”. Banich, M.T. and Mack, M. (eds.) Mind, brain, and language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 143-167.
  • Postman, L., Keppel, G. (eds.) (1970). Norms of word association. New york: Academic Press.
  • Pottier, B. (1963). Recherches sur l’analyse sémantique en linguistique et en traduction mécanique. Nancy, Université de Nancy.
  • Pottier, B. (1976). “Hacia una semántica moderna”. Lingüística moderna y filología hispánica. Madrid: Gredos, 99-133.
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2001). “Brain reflections of words and their meanings”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5/12, 217-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01803-9
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2005). The neuroscience of language. Reimpr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2012). “Meaning and the brain: the neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge”. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 423-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.03.004
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2013). “How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17/9, 458-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
  • Radwańska-Williams, J. (1994). A paradigm Lost. The linguistic thought of Mikołaj Kruszewski, Studies in the history of the language sciences. Amsterdam ⁄ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.72
  • Saussure, F. de (1916/1922, 2ª ed.). Cours deLinguistique Générale. Publié par Ch. Bally et A. Sechehaye avec la collaboration de A. Riedlinger. Paris: Payot.
  • Sechehaye, C. A. (1926). Essai sur la structure logique de la phrase. Paris: H. Champion.
  • Shanks, D. R. (1995). The Psychology os associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623288
  • Trier, J. (1931). Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Die Geschichte eines sprachlichen Feldes, I: Von den Anfängen bis zum Beginn des 13. Jahrhunderts. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
  • Trujillo, R. (1970). El campo semántico de la valoración intelectual en español. La Laguna: Universidad de La Laguna.
  • Trujillo, R. (1997). “El papel de la realidad en la semántica”. Casas Gómez, M. (dir.), Espinosa García, J. (ed.), II Jornadas de Lingüística. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz, 31-51.
  • Varo Varo, C. (2010). “El procesamiento de las relaciones léxicas”. Revista Española de Lingüística, 40/1, 149-171.
  • Varo Varo, C. (2013). “Aproximación teórico-práctica al procesamiento lingüístico de neologismos léxicos”. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 46/81, 132-52.
  • Varo Varo, C. (2017). “Nuevos retos en la investigación del contenido léxico: elementos para una neurosemántica”. Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, 33/3, 1032-1059. https://doi.org/10.15581/008.33.3.1032-59
Data source: Dialnet