BPMS para la gestiónuna revisión sistemática de la literatura

  1. Martín-Navarro, Alicia
  2. Lechuga Sancho, María Paula
  3. Medina-Garrido, José Aurelio
Revista:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 41

Número: 3

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2018.3.1532 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de documentación científica

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es realizar un análisis sistemático de la literatura para mostrar el estado del arte en la investigación sobre los Sistemas de Gestión de Procesos de Negocio (BPMS, por sus siglas en inglés). Los BPMS representan una tecnología que automatiza los procesos de negocio, conectando a usuarios con sus tareas. Para ello, se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura de los últimos diez años, utilizando trabajos científicos indexados en las principales bases de datos del área de conocimiento. Los trabajos generados por la búsqueda fueron posteriormente analizados y filtrados. Entre los hallazgos de este estudio destaca el interés académico y el carácter multidisciplinar de la materia, identificándose este tipo de estudio en distintas áreas de conocimiento. Este estudio sirve como punto de partida para futuras investigaciones en este ámbito que servirían para desarrollar una teoría más robusta y ampliar el interés del tema por su impacto económico en la gestión por procesos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aalst, W. van der; Hofstede, A. Ter; Weske, M. (2003). Business process management: A survey. En International conference on business process management (pp. 1–12). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44895-0_1
  • Bhosale, V. A.; Kant, R. (2016). Metadata analysis of knowledge management in supply chain. Business Process Management Journal, 22 (1), 140–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2015-0014
  • Biolchini, J.; Mian, P. G.; Candida, A.; Natali, C. (2005). Systematic Review in Software Engineering. Engineering, 679 (May), 1–31.
  • Boell, S. K.; Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). On being "systematic" in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30 (2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26
  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Coulson, T.; Olfman, L.; Ryan, T.; Shayo, C. (2010). Enterprise Systems Training Strategies: Knowledge Levels and User Understanding. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 22 (3), 22. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2010070102
  • Da Silva, F. Q. B.; Santos, A. L. M.; Soares, S.; Frana, A. C. C.; Monteiro, C. V. F.; MacIel, F. F. (2011). Six years of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: An updated tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 53 (9), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.04.004
  • David, R. J.; Han, S.-K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.359
  • Dybå, T.; Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50 (9–10), 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
  • Echeverri, D. R. C.; Cruz, R. Z. (2014). Revisión de instrumentos de evaluación de clima organizacional/Review of organizational climate assessment tools/Análise de instrumentos de avaliação de clima organizacional. Estudios Gerenciales, 30 (131), 184–189.
  • Fernández, R. (1998). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica. Revista de Divulgación Científica Y Tecnológica de La Asociación Ciencia Hoy, 8 (44), 60–66.
  • García-Pe-alvo, F. J.; Pardo, A. M. S. (2015). Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Teoría de La Educación; Educación Y Cultura En La Sociedad de La Información, 16 (1), 119-144.
  • Giunipero, L. C.; Hooker, R. E.; Joseph-Matthews, S.; Yoon, T. E.; Brudvig, S. (2008). A decade of SCM literature: Past, present and future implications. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (4), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00073.x
  • Guinea, A. S.; Nain, G.; Le Traon, Y. (2016). A systematic review on the engineering of software for ubiquitous systems. The Journal of Systems and Software, 118, 251-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.024
  • Harmon, P. (2010). The scope and evolution of business process mangement. In Handbook on Business Process Management 1 (pp. 37–81). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00416-2_3
  • Hohenstein, N.O.; Feisel, E.; Hartmann, E. (2014). Human resource management issues in supply chain management research: A systematic literature review from 1998 to 2014. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 44 (6), 434–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2013-0175
  • Houy, C.; Fettke, P.; Loos, P. (2010). Empirical research in business process management - analysis of an emerging field of research. Business Process Management Journal, 16 (4), 619–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011065946
  • Keller, S. B.; Ozment, J. (2009). Research on personnel issues published in leading logistics journals: What we know and don't know. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20 (3), 378–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090911002832
  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK.: Keele University. TR/SE- 0401.
  • Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55 (12), 2049–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010
  • Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE 2007-001.
  • Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, O. P.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Bailey, J.; Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51 (1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
  • Kitchenham, B.; Pretorius, R.; Budgen, D.; Brereton, O. P.; Turner, M.; Niazi, M.; Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering. A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52 (8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
  • Kohlbacher, M. (2010). The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Business Process Management Journal, 16 (1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011017985
  • Malaurent, J.; Avison, D. (2016). Reconciling global and local needs: A canonical action research project to deal with workarounds. Information Systems Journal, 26 (3), 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12074
  • Minonne, C.; Turner, G. (2012). Business Process Management-Are You Ready for the Future? Knowledge and Process Management, 19 (3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1388
  • Pérez-Anaya, O. (2017). Osk Index: A new measurement for scientific journal bibliometrics . Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 40 (2), e174. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.2.1418
  • Pistol, L.; Bucea-Manea-Tonis, R. (2015). Workflow systems as a tool for small and medium size enterprises business processes management. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 10 (8), 1250–1258.
  • Poelmans, S.; Reijers, H. A.; Recker, J. (2013). Investigating the success of operational business process management systems. Information Technology and Management, 14 (4), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-013-0167-8
  • Ramírez Correa, P.; García Cruz, R. (2005). Meta-análisis sobre la implantación de sistemas de planificación de recursos empresariales (ERP). JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 2 (3), 245–273.
  • Reijers, H. A. (2006). Implementing BPM systems: the role of process orientation. Business Process Management Journal, 12 (4), 389-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610678041
  • Reijers, H. A.; Vanderfeesten, I.; Aalst, W. van der (2016). The effectiveness of workflow management systems: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Information Management, 36 (1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.08.003
  • Restrepo Valencia L.; Cano, A.; Casta-eda, C.; Sánchez, R.; González Ariza, S. (2015). Análisis de la producción científica de la Revista CES Odontología en los últimos 10 a-os. Revista CES Odontología, 28 (2), 119–131.
  • Rhee, S.-H.; Cho, N.; Bae, H. (2010). Increasing the efficiency of business processes using a theory of constraints. Information Systems Frontiers, 12 (4), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9145-9
  • Robson, M.; Ullah, P. (1996). A practical guide to business process re-engineering. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  • Rooney, A.; Boyles, A.; Wolfe, M. (2014). Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments. Environmental, 7 (122), 711–722.
  • Sánchez, L.; Blanco, B. (2016). Review of professional literature from the Hispanic world on the field of continuous improvement: 1990-2011. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 39 (1), e116. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.1.1264
  • Smith, H.; Fingar, P. (2003). Business process managemen : the third wave. Tampa, Fla.: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
  • Soni, G.; Kodali, R. (2011). A critical analysis of supply chain management content in empirical research. Business Process Management Journal, 17 (2), 238–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151111122338
  • Tarhan, A.; Turetken, O.; Reijers, H. A. (2016). Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 75, 122– 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.010
  • Thomé, A. M. T.; Scavarda, A.; Ceryno, P. S.; Remmen, A. (2016). Sustainable new product development: a longitudinal review. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18 (7), 2195–2208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1166-3
  • Turner, M.; Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, P.; Charters, S.; Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52 (5), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005
  • Valverde, R.; Talla, M. (2012). Information Systems Reengineering for Modern Business Systems: ERP, Supply Chain and E-Commerce Management Solutions. IGI Global.
  • Wen, J.; Li, S.; Lin, Z.; Hu, Y.; Huang, C. (2012). Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models. Information and Software Technology, 54 (1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.09.002
  • Winter, M.; Knemeyer, A. M. (2013). Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management: Current state and opportunities for future inquiry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 43 (1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031311293237
  • Zanoni, M.; Perin, F.; Fontana, F. A.; Viscusi, G. (2014). Pattern detection for conceptual schema recovery in data-intensive systems. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 26 (12), 1172–1192.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet