Patrones de coautoría en las publicaciones españolas en ciencias económicas y empresariales indexadas en el SSCI

  1. Ramos Rodriguez, Antonio R. 1
  2. Lechuga Sancho, María Paula 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

Revista:
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

ISSN: 1988-9046

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 1

Páginas: 113-136

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17561//REE.V2020N1.8 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

Resumen

La coautoría en las publicaciones de investigación es un claro exponente de colaboración científica. Su estudio a lo largo del tiempo permite conocer la respuesta de los investigadores a los criterios de evaluación que las instituciones públicas establecen para evaluar su rendimiento. Con esta intención, el objetivo general de este trabajo ha sido analizar los hábitos de firma de los investigadores españoles en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, en revistas indexadas en el Social Science Citation Index. Concretamente, se ofrecen respuestas a tres cuestiones de investigación relacionadas con el número de autores, la posición en el orden de firma y el papel del autor para la correspondencia. Se han observado importantes cambios a lo largo del tiempo, y diferencias significativas entre el campo de la Economía y las Ciencias Empresariales que pueden ser de interés sobre todo para que los responsables del diseño de los diferentes sistemas de promoción y acreditación tengan una visión más certera de la situación real y del proceso adaptativo que ellos mismos generan en la comunidad científica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2019). The collaboration behavior of top scientists. Scientometrics, vol. 118, n1 1, pp. 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2970-9
  • Abramo, G.; d'Angelo, C.A.; Rosati, F. (2019). Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline. Scientometrics. 2013; nº 97, pp. 779-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1013-9
  • Avula, J.; Avula, H. (2015). Authors, authorship order, the moving finger writes. J Indian Soc Periodontol Jun; vol. 19, nº 3, pp. 258-62. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.145782
  • Bhandari, M.; Guyatt, G. H.; Kulkarni, A. V., Devereaux, P. J.; Leece, P.; Bajammal, S.; Busse, J. W. (2014). Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, nº 9, pp. 1049-1054. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006
  • Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, vol. 28, nº 2, pp. 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
  • Brewis, J. (2018). On interference, collegiality and co-authorship: Peer review of journal articles in management and organization studies: The interdisciplinary journal of organization, theory and society the interdisciplinary journal of organization, theory and society. Organization, vol. 25, nº 1, pp. 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417703472
  • Cainelli, G., Maggioni, M.A., Uberti, T.E., de Felice, A. (2015). The strength of strong ties: How co-authorship affect productivity of academic economists?. Scientometrics, nº 102, pp. 673-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1421-5
  • Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 52, nº 7, pp. 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
  • Cutas, D. and Shaw, D. (2015) Writers blocked: on the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, nº 5, pp. 1315-1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0
  • De Filippo, D., Morillo, F., & Fernandez, M. T. (2008). Indicators of scientific collaboration between CSIC and Latin America through international databases. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 31, nº 1, pp. 66-84. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2008.v31.i1.413
  • Duffy, M. A. (2017). Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology. Ecology and Evolution, vol. 7, nº 21, pp. 8876-8887. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3435
  • Endenich, C.; Trapp, R. (2016). Cooperation for Publication? An Analysis of Co-authorship Patterns in Leading Accounting Journals. European Accounting Review, 2016, vol. 25, nº. 3, pp. 613- 633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1085886
  • Fox, C. W., Ritchey, J. P., & Paine, C. (2018). Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecology and evolution, vol. 8, nº 23, pp. 11492-11507. Glanzel y Schubert, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4584
  • Glänzel, W. (2001). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, vol. 50, nº 3, pp. 461-473.
  • González Alcaide, G., & Ferri, J. G. (2014). La colaboración científica: principales líneas de investigación y retos de futuro. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1186
  • Scientific collaboration: main research lines and future challenges. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, Octubre-Diciembre 2014, vol. 37, nº 4, e062.
  • González-Alcaide, G., Park, J., Huamaní, C., & Ramos, J. M. (2017). Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications. PloS one, vol. 12, nº 8, e0182513Helgesson, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182513
  • Helgesson, G; Eriksson, S. (2019) Authorship order. Learned Publishing, vol. 32, nº 2, pp. 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1191
  • Jin, J. C. (2019). Research productivity in business and economics: South korea, 1990-2016*. East Asian Economic Review, vol. 23, nº 1, pp. 89-107. Katsouyanni, 2008. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2019.23.1.357
  • Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali (2016). Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal, BRQ Business Research Quarterly, vol. 19, nº 3, pp. 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001
  • Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One, vol. 10, nº 6, e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
  • Madiba, T. E., and Dhai, A. (2006). Addressing authorship disputes. S. Afr. Med. J. nº 96, pp. 49-50.
  • Manton, E. J., English, D. (2008) 'An Empirical Study of Gift Authorships in Business Journals', The Journal of Education for Business, vol. 83, nº 5, pp. 283-7. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.5.283-287
  • Manton, E. J.; English, D. E. (2007). The trend toward multiple authorship in business journals. Journal of Education for Business, vol. 82, nº 3, pp. 164-8. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.3.164-168
  • Marušić, A.; Bošnjak, L.; Jerončić, A. (2011). A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines, PLoS One, vol. 6, nº 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477
  • Mattsson P, Sundberg CJ, Laget P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, nº 87, pp. 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0310-9
  • Mishra, R. & Ramesh, D.B. (2018). A study of authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in business research during 1998-2017. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, vol. 8, nº 3, pp. 150-153. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5576.2018.00032.8
  • Mo, Z., Hui-Zhen Fu, & Yuh-Shan Ho. (2018). Highly cited articles in wind tunnel-related research: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, vol. 25, nº 16, pp. 15541-15553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1766-z
  • Nowell, C., & Grijalva, T. (2011). Trends in co-authorship in economics since 1985. Applied Economics, vol. 43, nº 28, pp. 4369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.491458
  • Pfleegor, A. G., Katz, M., & Bowers, M. T. (2019). Publish, perish, or salami slice? authorship ethics in an emerging field: JBE JBE. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 156, nº 1, pp. 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3578-3
  • Rath, K, and K Wohlrabe (2016), "Recent trends in co-authorship in economics: evi-dence from RePEc", Applied Economics Letters, vol. 23, nº 12, pp. 897-902. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1119783
  • Ruíz-Pérez, R., Marcos-Cartagena, D., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2014). La autoría científica en las áreas de ciencia y tecnología. Políticas internacionales y prácticas editoriales en las revistas científicas españolas. Revista española de Documentación Científica, vol. 37, nº 2, e049. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.2.1113
  • Safa, M. (2012). Ethics in publication: To be practices or not to be. International Journal of Business and Management Services, nº 5, 77-84.
  • Schubert T, Sooryamoorthy R. Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics. 2010; nº 83, pp.181-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0074-2
  • Smith E and Williams-Jones B (2012) Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, nº 2, pp. 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5
  • Smith, E. (2017). A theoretical foundation for the ethical distribution of authorship in multidisciplinary publications. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, vol. 27, nº 3, pp. 371-411. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0032
  • Sundling, P. (2017), "The many hands of science: commonalities and differences in the research contributions of authors and subauthors", Aslib Journal of Information Management, vol. 69, nº. 5, pp. 591-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0012
  • Wang, X., Xu, S., Wang, Z., Peng, L., & Wang, C. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, vol. 95, nº 3, pp. 885-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0877-4
  • Wardil, L., & Hauert, C. (2015). Cooperation and coauthorship in scientific publishing. Physical Review E, vol. 91, nº 1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012825
  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, vol. 316, nº 5827, pp. 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
  • Zutshi, A., McDonald, G., & Kalejs, L. (2012). Challenges in collaborative writing: Addressing authorship attribution. European Business Review, vol. 24, nº 1, pp. 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341211191535
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet