Body painting as a useful technique in teaching anatomy for sciences of physical activity and sports students

  1. Antonio Ribelles-García 12
  2. Carmen Carrasco-Molinillo 1
  3. Alonso Camacho Ramírez 2
  4. Gonzalo Pérez-Arana 1
  5. Arturo Prada-Oliveira 12
  6. Almorza Gomar, David 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

  2. 2 University Hospital Puerta del Mar
Zeitschrift:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte

ISSN: 1886-8576

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Ausgabe: 16

Nummer: 1

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte

Zusammenfassung

Anatomical knowledge supports any approach to the knowledge on physical activities and sport activities. The present report is focused in a technic to improve the learning of surface anatomy through the body painting. We had considered many ways in which human anatomy could be taught in an updated way to sciences of physical activity and sport students. All strategies and didactic resources must optimize the overall the teaching processes. We tested several methodological techniques in anatomy teaching to several students. For this purpose, we used a route of practical session, where students painted their own bodies. For one semester, the first-year sport sciences students, enrolled in the Human Anatomy signature at the University of Cádiz participated in this study. To complete the teaching activity, students were divided into 2 groups with 40 students each. At the end of the course, the students were asked to complete a satisfaction questionnaire supplied to them such through an on-line platform. We included this activity in other anatomical students, as medical student, and we modified this experience according to the specific studies. No similar experiences were reported in these university students. On the basis of the results, we recommend the body painting activity as a useful tool for learning human anatomy

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • McLachlan JC, Regan De Bere S. How we teach anatomy without cadavers. Clinic Teach, 2004; 1: 49–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2004.00038.x.
  • Estaia M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat, 2016; 208: 151–157. Doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010.
  • Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl, 2007; 89: 104–107. Doi: 10.1308/003588407X168244.
  • Chan Lk, Pawlina W. Teaching Anatomy. A Practical Guide. Springer (London). 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-08929-4. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0.
  • Senos R, Ribeiro MS, de Souza Martins K, Pereira LV, Mattos MF, Kfoury JR, Rodrigues MR. Acceptance of the bodypainting as supportive method to learn the surface locomotor apparatus anatomy of the horse. Folia Morphol, 2015; 74(4): 503-507. DOI: 10.5603/FM.2015.0023.
  • Boon JM, Meiring JH, Richards PA. Clinical anatomy as the basis for clinical examination: development and evaluation of an introduction to clinical examination in a problem-oriented medical curriculum. Clinic Anat, 2002; 15: 45–50. doi 10.1002/ca.1091.
  • Dettmer S, Schmiedl A, Meyer S, Giesemann A, Pabst R, Weidemann J, Wacker FK, Kirchhoff T. Radiological anatomy -evaluation of integrative education in radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr, 2013; 185(9): 838-843. doi 10.1055/s0033-1335048.
  • Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ, 2010; 3: 83–93. Doi:10.1002/ase.139.
  • Singha V, Kharbb P. A paradigm shift from teaching to learning gross anatomy: meta-analysis of implications for instructional methods. J Anat Soc Ind, 2013; 62: 84–89. Doi: 10.1016/S0003-2778(13)80019-6.
  • Hariri S, Rawn C, Srivastava S, Youngblood P, Ladd A. Evaluation of a surgical simulator for learning clinical anatomy. Med Educ, 2004; 38: 896–902. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01897.x.
  • Yiou R, Goodenough D. Applying problem-based learning to the teaching of anatomy: the example of Harvard Medical School. Surg Radiol Anat, 2006; 28: 189–194. Doi: 10.1007/s00276-005-0062-z.
  • Laksov KB, Lonka K, Josephson A. How do medical teachers address the problem of transfer? Adv Health Scienc Educ, 2008; 13: 345–360. Doi 10.1007/s10459-006-9048-9.
  • Zurada A, Gielecki JS, Osman N, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Zurada-Zielinska A, Bedi N, Nowak D. The study techniques of Asian, American, and European medical students during gross anatomy and neuroanatomy courses in Poland. Surg Radiol Anat, 2011; 33: 161–169. Doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0721-6.
  • Regan de Bere S, Mattick K. From anatomical ‘competence’ to complex capability. The views and experiences of UK tutors on how we should teach anatomy to medical students. Adv Health Scienc Educ, 2010; 15,573– 585. Doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9220-0.
  • Op Den Akker JW, Bohnen A, Oudegeest WJ, Hillen B. Giving color to a new curriculum: bodypaint as a to in medical education. Clinic Anat, 2002; 15: 356–362.
  • Finn GF. Twelve tips for running a successful body painting teaching session. Medic Teach, 2010; 32: 887-890. Doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.507708.
  • Aggarwal A, Brough H, Ellis H. Medical student participation in surface anatomy classes. Clinic Anat, 2006; 19: 627–631.
  • McMenamin PG. Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching. Anat Scienc Educ, 2008; 1: 139–144. Doi: 10.1002/ase.32.
  • Nanjundaiah K, Chowdapurkar S. Body-Painting: a tool which can be used to teach surface anatomy. J Clin Diag Res, 2012; 6(8): 1405-1408. Doi:10.7860/ JCDR/2012/4700.2370.
  • Hale SJH, Mirjalili SA, Stringer MD. Inconsistencies in surface anatomy: the need for an evidence-based reappraisal. Clinic Anat, 2010; 23: 922–930. Doi: 10.1002/ca.21044.
  • Azer SA. Learning surface anatomy: Which learning approach is effective in an integrated PBL curriculum? Medic Teach, 2011; 33: 78–80. Doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.530704.
  • Collett T, Kirvell D, Nakorn A, McLachlan JC. The role of living models in the teaching of surface anatomy: Some experiences from a UK Medical School. Medic Teach, 2009; 31: 90–96. Doi: 10.1080/01421590802516731.
  • Wilhelmsson N, Dahlgren LO, Hult H, Scheja M, Lonka K, Josephson A. The anatomy of learning anatomy. Adv Health Scienc Educ, 2010; 15: 153–165. Doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9171-5.
  • Patel KM, Moxham DBJ. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clinic Anat, 2006; 19: 132–141. Doi:10.1002/ca.20249.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet