Using the flipped classroom model in teacher education – is turning the tables the way forward?

  1. Rodríguez Pastor, Cristina 1
  2. Howard, Laura 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

Zeitschrift:
Aula de encuentro: Revista de investigación y comunicación de experiencias educativas

ISSN: 1137-8778,  2341-4847

Datum der Publikation: 2018

Ausgabe: 20

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 197-220

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.17561/AE.V20I2.10 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Aula de encuentro: Revista de investigación y comunicación de experiencias educativas

Zusammenfassung

This paper presents a flipped classroom project carried out on the Primary Education degree in the University of Cadiz.The initiative responded to the need to introduce a new way of working as students react with a higher level of interest and involvement to practical dynamics than to the traditional theory class. Difficulty in maintaining their focus during a theory class, trying to assimilate the concepts at the same time as they take notes and losing the thread during the explanations because they work at a slower or faster rate than the rest of the group were some of the problems our students were facing. These students would benefit from working with the material before the class at home and at their own pace, freeing up class time for collaborative, practical activities to exemplify and expand the concepts.  We analyse the key aspects of this methodology, paying special attention to the advantages and difficulties we faced during its implementation.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Acedo, M. (2018, January 8). 10 pros and cons of a flipped classroom. [Teach Thought].
  • Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from
  • Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. y Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). A white paper based on the literature review titled a review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network.
  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the Flipped Classroom in Teacher Education: Evidence from Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (1), 211-221.
  • Marqués, M. (2016). Qué hay detrás de la clase al revés (flipped classroom). En Actas de las XII Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (pp. 77-84). Almería: Universidad de Almería.
  • Mason, G., Shuman, T.R., & Cook, K.E. (2013). Inverting (flipping) classrooms—Advantages and challenges. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: a User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Medina Moya, J.L. (coord.) (2016). La docencia universitaria mediante el enfoque del aula invertida. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • Schmidt, S. & Ralph, D. (2016). The flipped classroom: a twist on teaching. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 1-6.
  • Talbert, R. (2014a, March 6). Getting student buy-in for the inverted calculus class [Blog post].
  • Talbert, R. (2014b, April 28). Flipped learning skepticism: Is flipped learning just self-teaching? [Blog post].
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet