Análisis del impacto de la colaboración internacional en el área de estudios empresariales

  1. Velez-Estevez, Antonio 1
  2. Garcia-Sanchez, Pablo 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Aldizkaria:
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

ISSN: 1988-9046

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 37-49

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.17561//REE.V2020N1.4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

Laburpena

With the rise of new technologies and means of collaboration, we are entering a new phase in the scientific field in which academics are seeking to take advantage of the benefits that international collaboration offers. One such advantage is the increased impact, measured in the number of citations, of those works carried out jointly by more than one country. This paper aims to demonstrate that this is also the case in the field of business studies carried out in Spain. To this end, we have measured the average number of citations and the h-index of all articles published in this field by Spanish authors at different levels of collaboration: local (the authors belong to the same affiliation), national (the authors belong to more than one affiliation, all from Spain) and international (at least one of the authors is from a foreign country). The results show that the highest average number of citations and the highest h-index is obtained at the international collaboration level. In addition, a comparison of the different Spanish universities was made, showing that there are differences between them with respect to the degree of international collaboration. This study is intended to be the basis for agents interested in improving scientific policies in this field in Spain to obtain a global vision of the state of international collaboration and to be able to go further into the future to improve their policies.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Asubiaro, T. (2019). How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author's role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1261-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1
  • Castillo, J. A. y Powell, M. A. (2018). Research Impact and International Collaboration: A Study of Ecuadorian Science . Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192718792151
  • Fang, W., Dai, S. y Tang, L. (2020). The impact of international research collaboration network evolution on Chinese business school research quality. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7528387
  • Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Barabási, A.-L. (2018). Science of Science. Science, nº 359, pp. 637). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
  • García-Sánchez, P. y Cobo, M. J. (2018). Measuring the Impact of the International Relationships of the Andalusian Universities Using Dimensions database. International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, pp. 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03496-2_16
  • Khor, K. A. y Yu, L.-G. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, vol. 107, nº 3, pp. 1095-1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1905-6
  • Milojević, S. (2015). Quantifying the cognitive extent of science. Journal of Informetrics, vol. 9, nº 4, pp. 962-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.005
  • Moed, H. F., Aisati, M. y Plume, A. (2013). A Studying scientific migration in Scopus. Scientometrics, vol. 94, nº 3, pp. 929-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0783-9
  • Ni, P. y An, X. (2018). Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics, vol. 116, nº 2, pp. 863-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9
  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W. y Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, vol. 60, nº 3, pp. 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d
  • Polyakov, M., Polyakov, S. y Iftekhar, M. S. (2017). Does academic collaboration equally benefit impact of research across topics? The case of agricultural, resource, environmental and ecological economics. Scientometrics, vol. 113, nº 3, pp. 1385-1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2523-7
  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2017). Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa. Scientometrics, vol. 111, nº 1, pp. 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2265-6
  • Sud, P. y Thelwall, M. (2015). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal Of The Association For Information Science And Technology, vol. 67, nº 8, pp. 1849-1857. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23515
  • Sugimoto, C., Robinson-Garcia, N., Murray, D., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R. y Larivière, V. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they're free to move. Nature, vol. 550, nº 7674, pp. 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/550029a
  • Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A. y Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, vol. 107, nº 3, pp. 1195-1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
  • Velez-Estevez, A., García-Sánchez, P., Moral-Munoz, J. y Cobo, M. J. (2020). Thematical and Impact Differences Between National and International Collaboration on Artificial Intelligence Research. IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/EAIS48028.2020.9122769
  • Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A. y Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, nº 110, pp. 1633-1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9
Datuen iturria: Dialnet