Desarrollo de la Teoría de la Mente entre los 5 y 6 años

  1. Rivas-García, S.M
  2. Hidalgo-Ruzzante,N.
  3. Gutiérrez-García,G
  4. Bergés,G.D
  5. Caracuel,A.
Revue:
Revista de Discapacidad, Clínica y Neurociencias: (RDCN)

ISSN: 2341-2526

Année de publication: 2018

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Pages: 26-38

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/DCN.2018.5.2.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de Discapacidad, Clínica y Neurociencias: (RDCN)

Résumé

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to recognize the mental states of others and oneself in order to act accordingly. Objectives were to determine if the acquisition of the items to evaluate ToM in children of 5 and 6 years old follows a hierarchical structure, and relationships with other factors. Method: 73 children with a mean age of 6.2 years were evaluated with a ToM scale of 7 items adapted to Spanish, and a subscale of pragmatic language. Rasch analysis showed that the acquisition of the items of the ToM scale follows a hierarchical order, slightly different from other cultures. Significant associations between items of the ToM and pragmatic language and coexistence with siblings were found. Development of the different milestones that make up the ToM of children of 5 and 6 years old takes place in a hierarchical way, with an order that varies between different cultures. The acquisition of several ToM milestones at these ages is associated with the degree of development of children's pragmatic linguistic ability and their coexistence with siblings, especially if they are older siblings.

Références bibliographiques

  • Cassel A, McDonald S, Kelly M, Togher L. Learning from the minds of others: A review of social cognition treatments and their relevance to traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 30 de noviembre de 2016;0(0):1-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2016.1257435
  • Brüne M. Emotion recognition, 'theory of mind,' and social behavior in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 28 de febrero de 2005;133(2):135-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.10.007
  • Povinelli DJ, Preuss TM. Theory of mind: evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends Neurosci. septiembre de 1995;18(9):418-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(95)93939-U
  • Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind" ? Cognition. octubre de 1985;21(1):37-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
  • Happé FGE. An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 1 de abril de 1994;24(2):129-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093
  • Baron-Cohen S, O'Riordan M, Stone V, Jones R, Plaisted K. Recognition of Faux Pas by Normally Developing Children and Children with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1 de octubre de 1999;29(5):407-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023035012436
  • Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1 de febrero de 2001;42(2):241-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715
  • Resches M, Serrat E, Rostan C, Esteban M. Language and Theory of Mind: A multidimensional approach. Infancia Aprendiz. 1 de enero de 2010;33(3):315-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1174/021037010792215136
  • Wellman HM, Fang F, Peterson CC. Sequential Progressions in a Theory-of-Mind Scale: Longitudinal Perspectives. Child Dev. 1 de mayo de 2011;82(3):780-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01583.x
  • Hughes C, Jaffee SR, Happé F, Taylor A, Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Origins of Individual Differences in Theory of Mind: From Nature to Nurture? Child Dev. 1 de marzo de 2005;76(2):356-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00850_a.x
  • Shahaeian A. Sibling, Family, and Social Influences on Children's Theory of Mind Understanding: New Evidence From Diverse Intracultural Samples. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1 de abril de 2015;46:1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115583897
  • McAlister A, Peterson C. A longitudinal study of child siblings and theory of mind development. Cogn Dev. 1 de junio de 2007;22(2):258-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.009
  • Prime H, Plamondon A, Pauker S, Perlman M, M. Jenkins J. Sibling cognitive sensitivity as a moderator of the relationship between sibship size and children's theory of mind: A longitudinal analysis. Cogn Dev. 1 de julio de 2016;39(Supplement C):93-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.03.005
  • White S, Hill E, Happé F, Frith U. Revisiting the Strange Stories: Revealing Mentalizing Impairments in Autism. Child Dev. 1 de julio de 2009;80(4):1097-117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x
  • Valdez D, editor. Autismo: enfoques actuales para padres y profesionales de la salud y la educación. Buenos Aires: Fundec; 2001.
  • Lecce S, Hughes C. «The Italian job?»: comparing theory of mind performance in British and Italian children. Br J Dev Psychol. noviembre de 2010;28(Pt 4):747-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X479006
  • Wellman HM, Fang F, Liu D, Zhu L, Liu G. Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychol Sci. diciembre de 2006;17(12):1075-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01830.x
  • Wellman HM, Liu D. Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks. Child Dev. 1 de marzo de 2004;75(2):523-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x
  • Puyuelo Sanclemente M, editor. Bloc screening-R: evaluación del lenguaje. Nueva ed. revisada y ampliada. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson; 2007. 1 p.
  • Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(Pt 1):1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466506X96931
  • Denham SA. Social Cognition, Prosocial Behavior, and Emotion in Preschoolers: Contextual Validation. Child Dev. 1986;57(1):194-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1130651
La source de données: Dialnet