Identifying the determinants of individual scientific performance: A perspective focused on AMO theory

Referencias bibliográficas

• Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39, 822-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
• Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P., & Verganti, R. (2012). Evaluating the performance of academic departments: An analysis of research-related output efficiency. Research Evaluation, 21, 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvr001
• Agasisti, T., Dal Bianco, A, Landoni, P., Sala, A., & Salerno, M. (2011). Evaluating the Efficiency of Research in Academic Departments: an Empirical Analysis in an Italian Region. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00489.x
• Amara, N., Rhaiem, M., & Halilem, N. (2020). Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 115, 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.059
• Andreeva, T., & Sergeeva, A. (2016). The more the better ... or is it? The contradictory effects of HR practices on knowledge-sharing motivation and behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12100
• Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T.T., Berg, P., & Kallenberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Ayaita, A., Pull, K., Backes-Gellner, U. (2019). You get what you ‘pay’for: Academic attention, career incentives and changes in publication portfolios of business and economics researchers. Journal of Business Economics, 89(3), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0880-6
• Bäker, A. (2015). Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers´job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors. Research Policy, 44, 634-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.012
• Barham, B.L., Foltz, J.D., & Prager, D. (2014). Making time for science. Research Policy, 43, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.007
• Bazeley, P. (2010). Conceptualising research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 35(8), 889-903. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903348404
• Bell, E., & Bryman, A. (2007). The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis. British Journal of Management, 18, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x
• Beltrán-Martín, I., & Bou-Llusar, J.C. (2018). Examining the intermediate role of employee abilities, motivation and opportunities to participate in the relationship between HR bundles and employee performance. Business Research Quaterly, 21, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.02.001
• Benet-Zepf, A., Marin-Garcia, J., & Küster, I. (2018). Clustering the mediators between the sales control systems and the sales performance using the AMO model: A narrative systematic literature review. Intangible Capital, 14(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1222
• Bentler, P.M. (1995). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
• Bentley, P.J., & Kyvik, S. (2013). Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries. Research in Higher Education, 54(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4
• Bland, C.J., Center, B.A., Finstad, D.A., Risbey, K.R., & Staples, J.G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American   Medical Colleges, 80(3), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200503000-00006
• Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285240
• Bos-Nehles, A.C., Van Riemsdijk, M.J., & Kees-Looise, J. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers’ HRM implementation, Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21578
• Bouwmans, M., Runhaar, P., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2019). Stimulating teachers’ team performance through team-oriented HR practices: the roles of affective team commitment and information processing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(5), 856-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1322626
• Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and Human Resource Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bozeman, B., Dietz, J., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and Technical Human Capital : An Alternative Model for Research Evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(8), 716-740. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988
• Buchmueller, T.C., Dominitz, J., & Hansen, W.L. (1999). Graduate training and the early career productivity of Ph. D. economists. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00019-3
• Carayol, N, & Matt, M. (2004). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33(8), 1081-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.004
• Cattell, R.B. (1966). The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
• Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors That Motivate Business Faculty to Conduct Research: An Expectancy Theory Analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.4.179-189
• Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Invited Editorial: Drilling for Micro-Foundations of Human Capital-Based Competitive Advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429-1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310397772
• Conway, J.M., & Lance, C.E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010- 9181-6
• Cook, W.D., Ramón, N., Ruiz, J.L., Sirvent, I., & Zhu, J. (2019). DEA-based benchmarking for performance evaluation in pay-for-performance incentive plans. Omega, 84, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.04.004
• Curtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A.J. (2016). Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students. Research in Higher Education, 57, 714-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9403-x
• Deemer, E.D., Martens, M.P., & Buboltz, W.C. (2010). Toward a Tripartite Model of Research Motivation: Development and Initial Validation of the Research Motivation Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 292-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710364794
• Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (1997). Critical mass and doctoral research: reflections on the Harris report. Studies in Higher Education, 22(3), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331380926
• Diem, A., & Wolter, S.C. (2013). The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences. Research in Higher education, 54, 86-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
• Dundar, H., & Lewis, D.R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in higher education, 39(6), 607-631. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018705823763
• Durette, B., Fournier, M., & Lafon, M. (2016). The core competencies of PhDs. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1355-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.968540
• Egghe, L. (2008). Mathematical theory of the hand g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1608-1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20845
• Fox, M.F. (1983). Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631283013002005
• Gonzalez-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F.M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research policy, 36, 1035-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.005
• Hardre, P.L., & Kollmann, S.L. (2012). Motivational Implications of Faculty Performance Standards. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(6), 724-751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212456913
• Harris, C.M., McMahan, G.C., & Wright, P.M. (2012). Talent and time together: The impact of human capital and overlapping tenure on unit performance. Personnel Review, 41(4), 408-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481211229357
• Hedjazi, Y., & Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher education, 62(5), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9410-6
• Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
• Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
• Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2016). The impact of publishing during PhD studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations. Research in Higher Education, 57(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9380- 0
• Iglesias, J.E., & Pecharroman, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73(3),303-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1805-x
• Janger, J, & Nowotny, K. (2016). Job choice in academia. Research Policy, 45(8), 1672-1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.001
• Jiang, K, Lepak, D.P., Hu, J., & Baer, J.C. (2012). How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
• Johns, G. (2017). Reflections on the 2016 decade award: incorporating context in organisational research. Academy of Management Review, 42, 577-595. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0044
• Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
• Käpylä, J, Jääskeläinen, A, & Lönnqvist, A. (2010). Identifying future challenges for productivity research: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(7), 607-623. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011075620
• Karasek, R.A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain. Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
• Kim, K.Y, Pathak, S, & Werner, S. (2015). When do international human capital enhancing practices benefit the bottom line? An ability, motivation, and opportunity perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7), 784-805. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.10
• Knies, E, & Leisink P. (2014). Linking people management and extra-rolebehaviour: Results of a longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12023
• Kumar, A, & Thakur, R.R. (2019). Objectivity in performance ranking of higher education institutions using dynamic data envelopment analysis. In press. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0089
• Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x
• Landeta, J. (1999). El método Delphi, una técnica de previsión del futuro. Barcelona: Ariel S.A.
• Lariviere, V, Macaluso, B, Archambault, E, & Gingras, Y. (2010). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations. Research Evaluation, 19, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X492495
• Leahey, E, Beckman, C.M, & Stanko, T.L. (2017). Prominent but less productive: the impact of interdisciplinarity on scientifist´s research. Administrative Science Quaterly, 62(1),105-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216665364
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social studies of science, 35(5), 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
• Lee, H.F, Miozzo M, & Laredo, P. (2010). Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Research Policy, 39(7), 869-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.001
• Lepak, D.P, Liao, H, Chung, Y, & Harden, E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 25(1), 217-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(06)25006-0
• Levecque, K, Ansell, F, De Beuckelaer, A, Van der Heyden, J, & Gisle, L. (2017) Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46, 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
• Lindell, M.K, & Whitney, D.J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of applied psychology, 86(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
• Lissoni, F, Mairesse, J, Montobbio, F, & Pezzoni, M. (2011). Scientific productivity and academic promotion: a study on French and Italian physicists. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 253-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq073
• Lovitts, B.E. (2005). Being a good course-taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043093
• MacDuffie, J.P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504800201
• Marie, J. (2008). Postgraduate science research skills: the role of creativity, tacit knowledge, thought styles and language. London Review of Education, 6(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802185136
• Marin-Garcia, J.A, & Martinez-Tomas, J. (2016). Deconstructing AMO framework: A systematic review Intangible Capital, 12(4), 1040-1087. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.838
• McNie, E.C, Parris, A, & Sarewitz, D. (2016). Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research. Research Policy, 45(4), 884-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.004
• Mitchell, T.R. (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285467
• Mudrak, J., Zabrodska, K., Kveton, P., Jelinek, M., Blatny, M., Solcova, I. et al. (2018). Occupational well-being among university faculty: A job demands-resources model. Research in Higher Education, 59(3), 325-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9467-x
• Nguyen, T.L.H. (2016). Building human resources Management capacity for university research: The case at four leading Vietnamese universities. Higher education, 71, 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9898-2
• Nonaka I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
• Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S.D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
• Papadimitriou, M., & Johnes, J. (2018). Does merging improve efficiency? A study of English universities. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1450851
• Ployhart, R.E., & Moliterno, T.P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A mulitlevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0318
• Peng, J.E., & Gao X. (2019). Understanding TEFL Academics’ Research Motivation and Its Relations with Research Productivity. SAGE Open, 9(3), 2158244019866295. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019866295
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Prpic, K. (1996). Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientists’ productivity. Scientometrics, 36(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017313
• Rorstad, K., & Aksnes, D.W. (2015). Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position – A largescale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.003
• Rowley, J. (2000). Is higher education ready for knowledge management?. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(7), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010378978
• Runhaar, P. (2017). How can schools and teachers benefit from human resources management? Conceptualising HRM from content and process perspectives. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215623786
• Sagarra, M., Molinero, C.M., & Agasisti, T. (2017). Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling. Omega, 67,123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.04.006
• Shmatko, N., & Volkora, G. (2017). Service or Devotion?. Motivation Patterns of Russian Researchers. Foresight and STI Governance, 11(2),54-66. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.1.54.66
• Schuelke-Leech, B.A. (2013). Resources and research: An empirical study of the influence of departmental research resources on individual STEM researchers involvement with industry. Research Policy, 42(9), 1667-1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.010
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A.V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2008). How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 426-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.09.001
• Su, X. (2011). Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9133-3
• Sutherland, K.A. (2017). Constructions of success in academia: an early career perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4),743-759
• Szulc, J.M., Davies, J., Tomczak, M.T., & McGregor, F.L. (2021). AMO perspectives on the well-being of neurodivergent human capital. Employee Relations, 43(4), 858-872. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2020-0446
• Szulc, J.M., & Smith, R. (2021). Abilities, Motivations, and Opportunities of Furloughed Employees in the Context of Covid-19: Preliminary Evidence From the UK. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 635144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635144
• Thunnissen, M., & Van Arensbergen, P. (2015). A multi-dimensional approach to talent: An empirical analysis of the definition of talent in Dutch academia. Personnel Review, 44(2), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2013- 0190
• Tiam, J., Nakamori, Y., & Wierzbicki, A.P. (2009). Knowledge management and knowledge creation in academia: A study based on surveys in a Japanese research university. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910942718
• Tien, F.F. (2008). What Kinds of Faculty Are Motivated to Perform Research by the Desire for Promotion?. Higher Education, 55, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9033-5
• Turner, L., & Mairesse, J. (2003). Individual productivity differences in scientific research: An econometric study of the publications of French physicists. Working Paper.
• Ulrich, W., & Dash D.P. (2013). Research skills for the future: Summary and critique of a comparative study in eight countries. Journal of Research Practice, 9(1), 1-21.
• Van der Weijden, I., Belder, R., Van Arensbergen, P., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2015). How do young tenured professors benefit from a mentor? Effects on management, motivation and performance. Higher Education, 69(2), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9774-5
• Van der Weijden, I., de Gilderb, D., Groenewegenb, P., & Klasenc, E. (2008). Implications of managerial control on performance of Dutch academic (bio) medical and health research groups. Research policy, 37, 1616-1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.007
• Van Waeyenber, T., & Decramer, A. (2018). Line managers’ AMO to manage employees’ performance: The route to effective and satisfying performance management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(22), 3093-3114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1445656
• Wang, J., Peters, H.P., & Guan, J. (2006). Factors influencing knowledge productivity in German research groups: Lessons for developing countries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610679408
• Wang, Z., & Xu, H. (2017). How and when service-oriented high-performance work systems foster employee service performance: A test of mediating and moderating processes. Employee Relations, 39(4), 523-540. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2016-0140
• White, C.S., James, K., Burke, L.A., & Allen, R.S. (2012). What makes a research star?. Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(6), 584-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211249175
• Wollersheim, J., Lenz, A., Welpe, I.M., & Spörrle, M. (2015). Me, myself, and my university: A multilevel analysis of individual and institutional determinants of academic performance. Journal of Business Economics, 85(3), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0735-3
• Wright, P.M., Coff, R., & Moliterno, T.P. (2014). Strategic Human Capital: Crossing the Great Divide. Journal of Management, 40(2), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313518437
• Wright, P.M., & McMahan, G.C. (2011). Exploring human capital: putting ‘human’ back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748- 8583.2010.00165.x
• Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Furner, J, Liu, R.C., & Ma, H. (2007). Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy, 36, 850-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.007