Reference holonic architecture for sustainable manufacturing enterprises distributed

  1. María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez 1
  2. Francisco Aguayo-González 1
  3. Mariano Marcos-Bárcena 2
  4. Juan Ramón Lama-Ruiz 1
  5. María Estela Peralta-Álvarez 1
  1. 1 Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, España.
  2. 2 Escuela Superior de Ingenieros, Universidad de Cádiz, España.
Aldizkaria:
DYNA: revista de la Facultad de Minas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Sede Medellín

ISSN: 0012-7353

Argitalpen urtea: 2017

Alea: 84

Zenbakia: 200

Orrialdeak: 160-168

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.15446/DYNA.V84N200.53095 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: DYNA: revista de la Facultad de Minas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Sede Medellín

Laburpena

The introduction of new operational requirements to manufacturing enterprises determines an emergent complexity in their lifecycle, due to different aspects such as geographic distribution, volatility and incertainty of business, incorporating TIC and intelligent technology, adoption of "edge technologies" to scales macro, meso and micro and incorporation of sustainability requirements. In the present work, it has established a paradigmatic framework to conceive Enterprises under an Integrated Architecture, as provided by its complexity from the variety required for sustainability (S) integrating business objectives (Economic S.), natural environment (Ecological S.) and individuals, social groups and cultural environment (Social S.). For this, the Holonic paradigm is proposed as a framework for bio-psycho-social inspiration that enables the design of Holonic Enterprises and entitiesdistributed in the range required by the environment.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Cornejo, A., Complejidad y caos guía para la administración del Siglo XXI. Juan Carlos Martínez Coll, [online]. 1997. Disponible en: http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/libreria/2004/aca/aca.htm
  • Ashby, W.R., Variety, constraint, and the law of requisite variety. Ed. Buckley, W., Modern Systems research for the behavioral scientist, Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co. 1968.
  • Prabhu, V., Services for competitive and sustainable manufacturing in the smart grid. In: Service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 227-240, 2012.
  • Suh, N.P., Complexity: Theory and applications. Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Warfield, J. and Cárdenas, A., A handbook of interactive management. Ames: Iowa State University Press, pp. 338, 1994.
  • Hall, R., Organizaciones, estructura y proceso. México. Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana, 1983.
  • Aguayo, F., Marcos, M., Sánchez, M. y Lama, J.R., Sistemas avanzados de fabricación distribuida. Ra-Ma, Madrid, 2007.
  • Beer, S., The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, pp. 7-25, 1984.
  • Gómez, J.M., Bello, R., Valencia, L., Aguayo, F., De las heras, A. y Lama, J.R., Modelo de sostenibilidad global para el diseño y desarrollo de productos en la cadena del valor. XVI Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Proyectos Valencia, 11-13 de julio de 2012.
  • Foster, J.B., Marx y la fractura en el metabolismo universal de la naturaleza. Monthly Review, 65(7), pp. 1-182013.
  • Foster, J.B., La ecología de Marx: Materialismo y naturaleza. Ed. El Viejo Topo, 2004.
  • Ayestarán, I., I+D+i+E: Ética de la innovación sostenible y responsabilidad social de las empresas. XVI Congreso de Estudios Vascos: Garapen Iraunkorra-IT. Donostia, pp. 287-294. 2006.
  • Intelligent Manufacturing System (IMS). [online]. Disponible en: http://www.ims.org, 2014.
  • Chen, D., Doumeingts, G. and Vernadat, F., Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in industry, 59(7), pp. 647-659, 2008.
  • Scheer, A., Architektur integrierter Informations systeme. Grundlagen der Unternehmensmodellierung. 2nd. Springer, 1992.
  • Browne, J. and Zhang, J., Extended and virtual enterprises - similarities and differences. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1, pp.30-36, 1999.
  • ISO 15704, Industrial automation systems—requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies, 2000.
  • EN/ISO I9439. Enterprise integration—framework for enterprise modelling, 2006.
  • Vernadat F.B., Enterprise modeling and integration: Principles and applications, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.
  • Shorterl, D.N., Requirements for enterprise model execution and integration services. Enterprise Engineering and Integration Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 235-243, 1997.
  • Doumeingts, G., Vallespir, B. and Chen, D., GRAI grid decisional modelling. Handbook on architectures of information systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 313-337, 1998.
  • Chen, D. and Vernadat, F.B., Enterprise interoperability: A standardisation view. Enterprise Inter-and Intra-Organizational Integration. Springer US, pp. 273-282, 2003.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E.W. and McGaughey, R.E., Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), pp. 957-983, 2006.
  • Grefen, P., Mehandjiev, N., Kouvas, G., Weichhart, G. and Eshuis, R., Dynamic business network process management in instant virtual enterprises. Computers in Industry, 60(2), pp. 86-103, 2009.
  • Anaya, V., Berio, G., Harzallah, M., Heymans, P., Matulevičius, R., Opdahl, A.L. and Verdecho, M.J., The unified enterprise modelling language - Overview and further work. Computers in Industry, 61(2), pp. 99-111, 2010.
  • IDEAS. Interoperability development for enterprise application and software thematic network (IST-2001-37368), [online]. 2014. Available in: http://cordis.europa.eu/ist/ka2/rmapsmartorg.html#ideas.
  • Ruggaber, R., Athena-Advanced technologies for interoperability of heterogeneous enterprise networks and their applications. Interoperability of enterprise software and applications, pp. 459-460, 2006.
  • Panetto, H., Scannapieco, M. and Zelm, M., INTEROP NoE: Interoperability research for networked enterprises applications and software. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 866-882, 2004.
  • Grabis, J., Kirikova, M., Zdravkovic, J. and Stirna, J., The practice of enterprise modeling. 6th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference, PoEM, Riga, Latvia, 2013-2015. [Online]. ISBN: 978-3-642-41640-8 (Print) 978-3-642-41641-5.
  • Arango, M.D., Branch, J. W. and Londoño, J.E., Enterprise architecture as tool for managing operational complexity in organizations. DYNA 81(185), pp. 219-226, 2014.
  • Ortiz A., Lario F. and Ros, L., Enterprise integration–business processes integrated management: A proposal for a methodology to develop enterprise integration programs. Computers in Industry, 40(2-3), pp. 155-171, 1999
  • ESPRIT Consortium AMICE. CIMOSA: Open System Architecture for CIM. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
  • Ortiz, A., Vrcilt - Virtual reality CIMOSA learning and training tutorial, 2005.
  • Doumeingts, G., Dossou, P.E., Despoix, T., Roque, M., Vallespir, B. and Domenger J.P., GRAI Metamodeling v 2.5. Technical report, UEML (IST-2001- 34229) WP3, 2002.
  • Williams, T., The Purdue enterprise reference architecture. In Elsevier, editor, Proc. of the Workshop on Design of Information Infrastructure Systems for Manufacturing, 1993.
  • IEM. Business process oriented knowledge management. In: K. Mertins, Heisig, P. and Vorbeck, J., eds., Knowledge Management. Concepts and Best Practices. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
  • Spur, G., Mertins, K. and Jochem, R., Integrated enterprise modelling. beuth Verlag GmbH, 1996.
  • Lillehagen, F., Dehli, E., Fjeld, L., Krogstie, J. and Jorgensen, H., Utilizing active knowledge models in an infrastructure for virtual enterprises. In PROVE, pp. 353-360, 2002.
  • Lankhorst, M., Enterprise architecture at work. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
  • Shah, H. and Kourdi, M.E., Frameworks for enterprise architecture. It Professional, 9(5), pp. 36-41, 2007.
  • Zachman, J., A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 38(2-3), pp.454-70, 1999.
  • IFIP-IFAC. Generalised enterprise reference architecture and method- ology (GERAM). Technical Report Version 1.6.3, 1999.
  • IDEF. Integrated DEFinition methods, [online]. 2014. Available in: http://www.idef.com/
  • Noran, O. UML vs. IDEF: An ontology-oriented comparative study in view of business modelling. In ICEIS (3), pp. 674-682, 2004.
  • Koestler, A., The ACT of creation. The Danube Edition, London, 1976.
  • Koestler, A. The ghost in the machine. The Danube Edition, London, 1981.
  • Koestler, A., Jano. Ed. Debate, Madrid, 1981.
  • Bongaerts, L., integration of scheduling and control in holonic manufacturing systems. PhD Thesis, Department Werktuigkunde Afdeling Productietechnieken. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belguin, 1998.
  • Ulieru, M., Stefanoiu, D. and Norrie, D., Holonic self-organization of multi-agent systems by fuzzy modeling with application to intelligent manufacturing. In: Systems, Man and cybernetics, 2000 IEEE International Conference (3), pp. 1661-1666, 2000.
  • McHugh, P., Merli, G. and Wheeler, W.A., Beyond business process reengineering: Towards the holonic enterprise, John Wiley, New York, N.Y, 1995.
  • Wilber, K., Una teoría de todo: Una visión integral de la ciencia, la política, la empresa y la espiritualidad. Editorial Kairós, 2001.
  • Aguayo, F., Diseño y fabricación de productos en sistemas holónicos: Aplicación al desarrollo de un módulo holónico de diseño, Tesis Doctoral, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industrial, Universidad de Cádiz, España, 2003.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet