La ergometría en la vigilancia de la salud en una población laboral de extinción de incendios

  1. Antonio Ares Camerino 1
  2. Jesús Oneto Otero 2
  3. Eduardo M. Morentin 2
  4. Jesús Mora Vicente 3
  5. Beatriz Sainz Vera 4
  6. Maria L. Soto Pino 1
  1. 1 Unidad de Salud Laboral. Consorcio de Bomberos de la Provincia de Cádiz Diputación Provincial de Cádiz. España
  2. 2 Unidad de Salud Laboral. Consorcio de Bomberos de la Provincia de Cádiz Unidad de Cardiología. Clínica de La Salud. Cádiz. España
  3. 3 Unidad de Salud Laboral. Consorcio de Bomberos de la Provincia de Cádiz Escuela Universitaria. Universidad de Cádiz. España
  4. 4 Unidad de Salud Laboral. Consorcio de Bomberos de la Provincia de Cádiz Hospital Clínico de Puerto Real. Cádiz. España
Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Medicina y seguridad del trabajo

ISSN: 0465-546X,  1989-7790

Année de publication: 2009

Volumen: 55

Número: 216

Pages: 56-64

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4321/S0465-546X2009000300007 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Medicina y seguridad del trabajo

Résumé

The indication of the ergometry in certain groups of hard–working persons is gathered by the category IIa (opinion in favour of its utility) of the American Hearth Association. The protocols of alertness in labour health (Ministry of Health and Consumption) do not gather the accomplishment of ergometry. Objective: to analyze the information of ergometry realized to 31 44–year–old major firemen. Method: Applied protocol BRUCE on rolling tapestry. The following information was analyzed: age, consumption of tobacco, cardiac frequency basal, PR, axis(axle) QRS, cardiac submaximum frequency, TAS/ TAD basal, maximum TAS/TAD, functional capacity, time of duration of the test(proof), total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and glucose. The cardiovascular risk was analyzed Results: The average of age was 48,82 years. 29,03 % was smoking. The information analytical was: glycemia 85,37 mg/100 cc, total cholesterol 205 mg/100 cc, HDL 53,03 mg/100 cc, LDL 151,07 mg/100 cc. Good response to the physical exercise(fiscal year). The functional capacity was 12,87 Mets, and the duration of 11,46 minutes. Conclusion: To include the ergometry in the protocols of alertness of the health for certain groups of workers

Références bibliographiques

  • 1. American Collage of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Cardiovascular Procedures: Guidelines for exercise testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8:725–738
  • 2. Chaitman B. Las pruebas de esfuerzo. En: Braumwald E, editor. Tratado de Cardiología. Medicina Cardiovascular (4ª ed). Madrid: McGraw–Hill–Interamericana de España 1993; 177–197.
  • 3. Reyes M, Iñiguez A, Goicolea A, Funes B, Castro A. El consentimiento informado en cardiología. Rev Esp Cardiología 1998; 51:782–796.
  • 4. Fletcher A, Flipse TR, Khigfield P, Malouf JR. Situación actual de la prueba de esfuerzo electrocardiográfica. Curr Probl Cardiol 1999;1:1–125.
  • 5. Howley ET, Bassett JR DR, Welch HG. Criteria of maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1291–1301.
  • 6. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Casaburi R, Whipp BJ. Measurements during integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. En: Weinberg R, editor. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999; p. 62–94.
  • 7. Fernhall B, Kohrt W. The effect of training specificity on maximal and sub maximal physiological response to treadmill and Cycle Ergometry. J Sport Med Phys Fitness 1990;30:268–75.
  • 8. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14: 377–381
  • 9. Noonan V, Dean E Submaximal Exercise Testing: Clinical Application and Interpretation . Phys Ther. 2000, vol 8, nº 8, august: 782–807
  • 10. Rich BS. Sudden death screening. Med Clin North Am 1994; 78: 267–288
  • 11. Maroon BJ, Shirin J, Polliac LC, Mathenge R, Roberts WC, Mueler FO. Sudden death in young competitive athletes. JAMA 1996; 276: 199–204
  • 12. Thompson PD. The cardiovascular complications of vigorous physical activity. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2297–2302.
  • 13. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA. Clinical Practice Guidelines. JAMA 2009; 301 (8): 831–841.
  • 14. Dal Monte A. Exercise testing and ergómetros. En: Dirix A, Knuttgen HG, Tittel K, editors. The Olympic book of sports medicine. IOC–FIMS. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1988
  • 15. Gibbons RJ (edit). ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines Update of Exercise Testing. 2002 American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association (internet), ACC/AHA; 2002. Disponible en: http:// www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/exercise/excercise_clean.pdf
  • 16. Guidelines for cardiac exercise testing. ESC Working Group on Exercise Physiology, Physiopathology and Electrocardiography Eur Heart J. 1993; 14: 969–988.
  • 17. Fernando Arós Aros F, Boraita A, Alegría E, Alonso AM, Bardaji A, Lamiel R et al. Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en pruebas de esfuerzo. Rev Esp Cardiología 2000; 53 (8): 1063–94.
  • 18. Protocolos de vigilancia de la salud. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. http://www.msc.es/ciudadanos/ saludAmbLaboral/saludLaboral/vigiTrabajadores/protocolos.htm
  • 19. Barron HV, Bowlby LJ, Breen T, et al for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States. Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Circulation 1998; 97:1150–1156
  • 20. Costelo Branco NA, Alves Pereira M. Vibroacoustic disease. Noise and Health. 2004, vol 6, nº 23: 3–20.
  • 21. Van Kempen EE, Kruize H, Boshuizen HC, Ameling CB, Staatsen BA, de Hollander AE: The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta–analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2002; 110: 307–317.
  • 22. Babisch W et al. Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk: The Caerphilly and Speedwell studies, third phase 10 year follow up. Arch Environ Health. 1999. May–June 54(3):210–216
  • 23. Van Kempen EE, Kruize H, Boshuizen HC, Ameling CB, Staatgen BAM, de Hollander AEM. The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic hearth disease: a meta–analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 March; 110(3): 307–317
  • 24. Babish W. Traffic noise and cardiovascular disease: Epidemiological Review Noise Health. 2000; 2(8): 9–32
  • 25. Tomei, F; Fantini, S; Tomao, E; Baccolo, TP; Rosati, MV. Hypertension and chronic exposure to noise. Arch Environ Health. 2000 55(5):319–325.Sep–Oct
  • 26. C Reeb–Whitaker, N Seixas, L Sheppard, and R Neitzel. Accuaracy of task recall for epidemiology exposure assessment to construction noise. Occup Environ Med. 2004 February; 61(2): 135–142
  • 27. E. Braunwald y J. Wynne. Heart Disease. 5ª Edición, capitulos 41,43. WB Saunders Company
  • 28. Kivimaki M, Leino–Arjas P, Luukkonen R, Riihimaki, H, Vahtera J, Kirjonen J. Work stress and risk cardiovascular mortality: prospectice cohort stady of industrial employees. BMJ 2002: 325, 857
  • 29. Fernández JA, Siegrist J, Rödel A y Hernández–Mejía R. El estrés laboral: un factor de riesgo. ¿Qué sabemos y qué podemos hacer? Atención Primaria 2003. Mayo. Vol 3 N8: 524–526.
  • 30. Boggild H and Knutsson A. Shift work, risk factors and cardiovascular disease. Prim Care. 2000 Dec (4) 1057–79
  • 31. Knutsson A. Health disorders of shift workers. Occupational Medicine. 2003. March 53(2): 103–108
  • 32. Bruce RA, DeRouen TA, Hossack KF. Value of maximal exercise tests in risk assessment of primary coronary heart disease events in healthy men: five years experience of the Seattle heart watch study. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46:371–378.
La source de données: Dialnet