La validez de la prueba indiciariaAnálisis de los requisitos para su amparo constitucional a la luz de la Sentencia 532/2019 de 4 de noviembre de 2019

Abstract

The need not to go unpunished for crimes has led to the use of circumstantial evidence. STS 532/2019 has been a turning point in the interpretation of the evidences based on a narrative exercise that is based on a judgment of rationality about the possibility and probability that a subject has committed criminal acts through the assessment of Evidence The appeal requires proof of the lack of rationality and evidence of the special constitutional significance of the matter. In this sense, the need to develop the «disposition» of the evidence in the historification of the facts is appreciated, through the concepts «logical leaps» and «intermediate premises».