Ciudadanía democrática y "ethos" científicouna perspectiva pragmatista

  1. Mougan Rivero, Juan Carlos 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España


Daimon: revista internacional de filosofía

ISSN: 1130-0507 1989-4651

Any de publicació: 2022

Número: 85

Pàgines: 113-128

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.6018/DAIMON.398791 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Altres publicacions en: Daimon: revista internacional de filosofía

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible


The erosion of confidence in the epistemic capacities of citizenship has at its root the radical separation between facts and values ​​that pragmatism has considered as the key to our culture. Today it is possible to overcome dualism on the basis of a set of virtues and individual dispositions that are both ethical and epistemic. This entanglement between the ethical and the epistemic highlights the overlap between a deliberative conception of democracy with its demand for a civic ethic and the requirements of an ethics of scientific research within the framework of a democratic society

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • ALLEA, European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities, (2013) The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. European Science Foundation.
  • Arias Maldonado, M. (2016) La democracia sentimental. Política y emo¬ciones en el siglo XXI, Página Indómita.
  • Berstein, R. (2005) The Abuse of Evil. Polity Press.
  • Bohman, J. (2004) “Realizing Deliberative Democracy as a Mode of Inquiry: Pragmatism, Social Facts, and Normative Theory”. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 18. No, 1.
  • Del Aguila, R. (2007) “Ironía, Verdad y Democracia, Richard Rorty In Memorian”, Revista de Libros, nº 131, 2007
  • Dewey, J. The Collected Works of John Dewey, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press. 1969 – 1991.
  • Douglas, Heather E. (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • European Commission. EU (2013) Options for strengthening reponsible research and innovation. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation.
  • Ferris, T. (2011) The Science of Liberty. Democracy, Reason, and the Laws of Nature. Harper Perennial.
  • Feyerabend, P. (1983) How to Defend Society against Science? En I. Hacking (ed). Scientific Revolutions (156-167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kitcher, P. (2011) Science in a Democratic Society. Prometheus Books. New York.
  • Koertge, N. ed. (2005) Scientific Values and Civic Virtues. Oxford University Press.
  • Longino H. E. (1995) “Gender, Politics and the Theoretical Virtues”. Synthese. Vol. 104, nº 3, pp 383 – 397.
  • Longino H. E. (2002) “Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher’s Science, Truth, and Democracy”. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 560-568.
  • Marchetti, G. & Marchetti, S. (2017) Facts and Values. The Ethics and Metaphysics of Normativity. Routledge.
  • Martí, J. Luís. (2006) La república deliberativa. Marcial Pons.
  • McMullin, E. (2012) “Values in Science”. Zygon, Vol 47, nº 4, 686 – 709.
  • Mill, J.S. (1991) Sobre la libertad. Espasa Calpe.
  • Misak, Cheryl (2000) Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. Routledge.
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M. (2002) Re-Thinking Science Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Blackwell.
  • Pallitto,N., Francese N., Pasquo, F., y Folguera, G. (2018) “Ciencia y Democracia. Una crítica filosófica a dos modelos de vínculo propuestos en Filosofía de la Ciencia”. Factótum 19, 1-11.
  • Parsons, K. (2005) “Defending the Radical Center”. En Koertge, 2005.
  • Paternotte, C., Ivanova, M., “Virtues and vices in scientific practice”. Synthese (2017) 194:1787–1807. DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1023-2
  • Putnam, H. (2002) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Harvard University Press.
  • Resnik D.B. y Elliot, (2016) “The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science”. Account Res; 23(1): 31 - 46 .
  • Strand, R. (2015) Indicators for promoting and monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation. Report from the Expert Group on Policy Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Talisse, Robert B. (2005) Democracy after Liberalism: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics.
  • Londres-Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Talisse, Robert B. (2007) A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. Londres-Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Taverne, D. (2005) The March of Unreason. Science, Democracy and the New Fundamentalism. Oxford University Press.
  • Turri, John, Alfano, Mark and Greco, John, (2008) "Virtue Epistemology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), .
  • Urbinati, N. (2014) Democracy disfigured: opinion, truth, and the people. Harvard University Press.
  • Vallespín, F, y Bascuñana. M. (2017) Populismos. Alianza Editorial.
  • Vargas-Machuca, R. (2015) “Democracia y verdad”, en Wences Simon Mª I (ed). Tomando en serio la teórica política: entre las herramientas del zorro y la estrategia del erizo, 269-292. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
  • Zagzebski, L. (1996) Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical foundations of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.