Patterns of Academic Scientific Collaboration at a Distance: Evidence from Southern European Countries
-
1
Universidad de Cádiz
info
Argitaletxea: IntechOpen
ISBN: 978-1-78923-307-0
Argitalpen urtea: 2018
Mota: Liburuko kapitulua
Laburpena
The main objective of this chapter is to examine the trends of academic scientific collaboration (SC) at a distance among public universities located in peripheral countries: Spain, Italy, Greece, and Portugal. The data to capture scientific collaboration consists of a set of co-authored articles published between 2001 and 2010 by universities located in the mentioned Southern countries, indexed by the Science Citation Index expanded (SCI Expanded) of the Information Sciences Institute (ISI) Web of Science (WoS) database. We link this data to institution-level information provided by the EUMIDA dataset. In addition, we retrieved regional data on economic variables from Eurostat. The methodology relies on a descriptive analysis of the evolution of co-publications at different notions of proximity. Our results show a trend toward collaboration over longer distances, although we find heterogeneity by countries and disciplines. Building on our results, we provide some policy implications.
Erreferentzia bibliografikoak
- Gazni A, Sugimoto CR, Didegah F. Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012;63(2):323-335
- Waltman L, Tijssen RJW, Eck NJV. Globalisation of science in kilometres. Journal of Informetrics. 2011;5(4):574-582
- Franceschet M, Costantini A. The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics. 2010;4(4):540-553
- Katz J. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics. 1994;31(1):31-43
- Sonnenwald DH. Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2007;41(1):643-681
- Foray D. Economics of Knowledge. MIT Press; 2004
- Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990;98(5):71-102
- European Commission. Social Policy Agenda, Communication from the European Commission, COM (2000) 379 Final. Brussels; 2000a
- European Commission. Towards an European Research Area, Communication from the European Commission, COM (2000) 6 Final. Brussels: EC; 2000b
- Acosta M, Coronado D, Ferrándiz E, León MD. Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics. 2011;87(1):63-74
- Fernández A, Ferrándiz E, León MD. Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better. Scientometrics. 2016;106:1073-1092
- Carrincazeaux C, Lung Y, Vicente J. The scientific trajectory of the French School of Proximity: Interaction- and institution-based approaches to regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies. 2008;16(5):617-628
- Rallet A, Torre A. Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? GeoJournal. 1999;49(4):373-380
- Torre A, Gilly JP. On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies. 2000;34(2):169-180
- Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies. 2005;39(1):61-74
- Hwang K. International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Science Technology Human Values. 2008;33(1):101-133
- Hoekman J, Frenken K, van Oort F. The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Annals of Regional Science. 2009;43:721-738
- Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen RJW. Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy. 2010;39(5):662-673
- Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990;35(1):128-152
- Nooteboom B, van Haverbeke W, Duysters G, Gilsing V, Van den Oord A. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy. 2007;36(7):1016-1034
- Gilsing V, Nooteboom B, Vanhaverbeke W, Duysters G, van den Oord A. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy. 2008;37(10):1717-1731
- Boschma R, Frenken K. Some notes on institutions in evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography. 2009;85(2):151-158
- Hennemann S, Rybski D, Liefner I. The myth of global science collaboration-collaboration patterns in epistemic communities. Journal of Informetrics. 2012;6(2):217-225
- Hoekman J, Scherngell T, Frenken K, Tijssen R. Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. Journal of Economic Geography. 2012;13:23-52
- Hong W, Su Y-S. The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data. Research Policy. 2013;42(2):454-464
- Petruzzelli AM. The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation. 2011;31(7):309-319
- Balland PA. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Regional Studies. 2011;46(6):741-756
- Cummings JN, Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy. 2007;36(10):1620-1634
- Mowery D, Sampat B. Universities in National Innovation Systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 209-239
- Acosta M, Coronado D, Ferrándiz E, León MD. Regional scientific production and specialization in Europe: The role of HERD. European Planning Studies. 2014;22:949-974
- Paci R, Usai S. Knowledge flows across European regions. The Annals of Regional Science. 2009;43:669-690