Cotejo de opiniones sobre factores que influyen en los procesos adquisitivos de L2:valoraciones de estudiantes del Grado en Educación Primaria

  1. José Luis Estrada Chichón
Journal:
Saberes. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Artes y Lenguas

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Abstract

This work compares the opinions of the students who took the course Early L2 Acquisition(2017-18) about the factors that influence the acquisition of second languages (L2). The course is offered as part of the Bachelor in Primary Education by a private Spanish university. The students’ opinions are collected after assessing twelve statements that comprise the questionnaire (Lightbown and Spada, 1999) used as main data collection tool. All the answers are numerical due to the typology of the questionnaire’s Likert-scale format. The questionnaire was provided to the students during two different stages of the course: introductory and final sessions. The questionnaire statements include some of the most relevant elements of the study of L2 acquisition: learner’s internal factors; error treatment; teacher’s methodological implications; etc. The most significant result points to the students’ change of opinion between the course’s introductory and final sessions for the majority of the questionnaire’s statements in relation to L2 acquisition.

Bibliographic References

  • AMBRIDGE, B. y LIEVEN, E. (2011): Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • BENATI, A. y SHWIETER, J. (eds.) (2018): Cambridge elements in second language acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • BROWN, R. y HANLON, C. (1970): «Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech», en J. HAYES (ed.) (1970: 11-54), Cognition and the development of language, Wiley, Nueva York.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1965): Aspects of the theory of syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • _____(1972): Syntactic structures, Mouton, La Haya.
  • CONSEJO DE EUROPA (2002): Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: Aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación, Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.
  • CORDER, P. (1967): «The significance of learners' errors», International review of applied linguistics, 5, 160-170.
  • _____(1981). Error analysis and interlanguage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • CRAIN, S. y LILLO-MARTIN, D. (1999). An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition, Blackwell, Oxford.
  • CRAIN, S. y PIETROSKI, P. (2001): «Nature, nurture and universal grammar», Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 139-186.
  • _____(2002): «Why language acquisition is a snap«, Linguistic review, 18, 163-183.
  • DÁVILA, R. (2012): La interculturalidad en la enseñanza del alemán como lengua extranjera con aprendientes de nivel inicial, tesis doctoral, Universidad de Cádiz.
  • DÖRNYEI, Z. (1994): «Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom», Modern language journal, 78, 273-284.
  • ELLIS, R. (1994): The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • _____(2005): «Principles of instructed language learning», ELSEVIER System, 33(2), 209-224.
  • EMERY, H. (2012): «A global study of primary English teachers’ qualifications, training and career development», ELT research papers 12-08, British Council, Londres.
  • ESTRADA, J. (2017): Tratamiento de errores en la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en la educación superior: posibilidades de corrección no intervencionista en la producción oral, tesis doctoral, Universidad de Cádiz
  • _____(20 octubre 2018): Recursos de familias mono/bi/multilingües para preservar y fomentar el uso de lenguas adicionales al español: estudio de caso sobre alumnos en la etapa de Reception, congreso internacional de educación bilingüe, Badajoz.
  • ENCUESTA SATISFACCIÓN FAMILIAS (2018): Evaluación Encuesta Satisfacción Familias, Comunidad de Madrid, accesible en http://www.comunidad.madrid/servicios/educacion/evaluacion-encuesta-satisfaccion-familias
  • GARDNER, R. (1985): Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation, Edward Arnold Publishers, Londres.
  • GHOLAMI, J. y ZINOLABEDINI, M. (2018): «Learnability and teachability hypothesis», The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, John Wiley & Sons, Nueva York.
  • GREENLE, M. y OHALA, J. (1980): «Phonetically motivated parallels between child phonology and historical sound change», Language science, 2(2), 283-308.
  • GILLARD, P. (próximo): Living under a multilingual roof: how parents raise their children to achieve bilingual or multilingual acquisition, trabajo de fin de grado, Universidad Nebrija.
  • HARMER, J. (1998): How to teach English, Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Essex.
  • HOWARD, M., MOUGEON, R. y DEWAELE, J. (2013): «Sociolingistics and second language acquisition», en R. BAILY, R. CAMERON y C. LUCAS (eds.) (2013: 340-359), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • KRASHEN, S. (1982): Principles and practice in second language acquisition, Pergamon, Oxford.
  • _____(1985). The input hypothesis, Laredo Publishing Co., Beverly Hills.
  • LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. (2017): «Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition», Foreign language annals, 51(1).
  • LIEVEN, E. y TOMASELLO, M. (2008): «Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective», en P. ROBINSON y N. ELLIS (eds.) (2008: 168-196), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, Routledge, Nueva York.
  • LIGHTBOWN, P. y SPADA, N. (1999): How languages are learned, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • LOCKE, J. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change, Academic Press, Nueva York.
  • COMUNIDAD BILINGÜE (2018), Madrid Comunidad Bilingüe, Comunidad de Madrid, accesible en http://www.comunidad.madrid/servicios/educacion/madrid-comunidad-bilingue
  • MARCUS, G. (1993): «Negative evidence in language acquisition», Cognition, 46, 53-85.
  • MEYER, O. (2010): «Towards quality-CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies», Pulso, 33, 11-29.
  • MORGAN, J. y TRAVIS, L. (1989): «Limits on negative information in language input», Journal of child language, 16, 531-552.
  • PAWLAK, M. (2014): Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
  • PIENEMANN, M. (1984): Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages, Studies in second language acquisition, 6(2), 186-214.
  • _____(1989): «Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses», Applied linguistics, 1, 52-79.
  • PINKER, S. (1984): Language learnability and language development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • _____(1994): The language instinct, Harper Perennial Modern Classics Press, Nueva York.
  • RICHARDS, J. (2002): «Accuracy and fluency revisited», en E. HINKEL y S. FOTOS (eds.) (2002: 35-50), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms, Erlbaum, Mahwah.
  • SELINKER, L. (1972): «Interlanguage», International review of applied linguistics, 10, 209-241.
  • SMITH, M. y TSIMPLI, I. (1995): The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • SPERBER, D. y WILSON, D. (1986): Relevance: Communication and cognition, Basil, Oxford.
  • TOMASELLO, M. (2003): Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • TRUSCOTT, J. (1996): «The case against grammar correction in L2 writing correction», Language learning, 46, 327-369.
  • TRUSCOTT, J. (1999): «What´s wrong with oral grammar correction», Canadian modern language review, 44(4), 437-456.
  • VIHMAN, M. (1980): «Sound change and child language», en E. TRAUGOTT, R. LABRUM, R. y S. SHEPERD (eds.) (1980), Papers from the fourth international conference in historical linguistics, 14, Benjamins, Ámsterdam.
  • WRIGHT, C., PISKE, T. y YOUNG-SCHOLTEN, M. (2018), Mind matters in SLA, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.
  • ŽEGARAC, V. (2004): «Relevance theory and the in second language acquisition», Sage journals, 20.
Data source: Dialnet