Analysis and Modeling of Sunscreen Ingredients’ Behavior in an Aquatic Environment

Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Gema; Rodríguez-Romero, Araceli; Tovar-Sánchez, Antonio; Viguri Fuente, Javier R.

doi:10.3390/OCEANS3030024

Analysis and Modeling of Sunscreen Ingredients’ Behavior in an Aquatic Environment

Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Gema
Rodríguez-Romero, Araceli
Tovar-Sánchez, Antonio
Viguri Fuente, Javier R.

1 Green Engineering & Resources Research Group (GER), Departamento de Química e Ingeniería de Procesos y Recursos, ETSIIT, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. de los Castros 46, 39005 Santander, Cantabria, Spain
2 Departamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, Campus Universitario Río San Pedro, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
3 Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Costera, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía (CSIC), Campus Universitario Río San Pedro, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain

Mostrar afiliaciones +

Revista:

Oceans

ISSN: 2673-1924

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 3

Número: 3

Páginas: 340-363

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3390/OCEANS3030024 GOOGLE SCHOLAR Acceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Oceans

Resumen

Sunscreens have become a product based on increasingly complex formulations that include, among many ingredients, a mixture of UV filters to provide optimal sun ultraviolet radiation protection. A significant group of scientific works deals with the impact of UV filters in aquatic media. However, the knowledge of the mechanism and kinetics of the compound’s direct release, fate, and its transformation and interaction with living organisms is necessary to assess its environmental occurrence and behavior and to predict potential and real impacts on the aquatic environment. This review outlines the existing analysis and modeling of the release and behavior of sunscreen’s ingredients in the marine environment, including aquatic organisms. The physical-chemical properties, photodegradation, and release kinetics of particles and chemicals into the water are studied by hydrodynamic and kinetic models. Direct photolysis of chemicals is modeled as pseudo-first-order kinetics, while the indirect pathway by the reaction of sunscreen with reactive oxygen species is described as second-order kinetics. The interaction of UV filters with marine biota is studied mainly by toxicokinetic models, which predict their bio-accumulation in the organisms’ tissues. These models consider the chemicals’ uptake and excretion, as well as their transfer between different internal animal organs, as a first-order kinetic process. The studies analyzed in the present work represent a driver of change for the beauty and personal care industry, in order to seek new ecological alternatives through the application of R&D tactics. View Full-Text

Referencias bibliográficas

Cosmetics Industry—Statistics & Facts https://www.statista.com/topics/3137/cosmetics-industry/#dossierKeyfigures
Global Sunscreen Ingredients Market Report 2021, Featuring Key Players Ashland Inc., BASF, Evonik Industries, l’Oreal SA and Royal DSM. 30 September 2021 08:43 ET | Source: Research and Markets https://www.researchandmarkets.com/categories/personal-care#hmc
10.1371/journal.pone.0065451
10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.013
10.1021/acs.est.9b02739
10.3390/nano12040699
10.3389/fenvs.2020.00101
10.1016/j.envint.2015.06.007
FDA, (2019)
Ingredient Trends and Innovation in Sun Protection https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317545165_Ingredients_Trends_and_Innovation_in_Sun_Protection
10.3390/app11156882
10.1002/ieam.4411
McCall, (2018), pp. 389
10.1186/s12989-016-0154-4
10.1016/j.talanta.2017.05.002
10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116263
10.1007/s13762-018-1960-z
10.1021/acs.est.6b05211
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.040
10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.012
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127941
10.1002/etc.4147
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.064
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.080
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.090
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.019
10.1002/jat.4210
10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.105355
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.029
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.180
10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.024
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.068
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.146
10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.003
10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.011
10.1021/es9015553
10.1021/es7029637
10.1016/0166-445X(90)90019-L
10.1021/acs.est.0c07446
10.1021/acs.est.8b03725
10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00429.x
10.1177/0960327110391387
10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.023
10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.017
10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.045
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.072
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.012
10.1016/S0021-9673(03)01331-1
10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.10.023
10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.009
10.1016/j.envpol.2011.03.003
10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.046
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.049
10.1021/es5020696
10.1016/j.cej.2021.132684
10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102327
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123591
10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102282
10.1007/s40201-018-0309-3
10.1007/s11356-015-5631-z
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.041
10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.078
10.1021/es903757q
10.1016/j.jpba.2009.05.003
10.1016/j.microc.2016.03.020
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.053
10.3390/nano7010021
10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.034
10.1021/es00015a013
10.1016/j.molcata.2011.10.002
10.1021/es301027a
10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.011
10.7773/cm.v32i12.1030
10.1016/j.aca.2007.11.018
10.1021/es501939c
10.1002/wer.1637
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111078
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.144
10.1038/s41598-017-08013-x
10.1371/journal.pone.0030321
10.3389/fmars.2021.665548
10.1016/j.aca.2013.12.033
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.089
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142486
10.1111/phpp.12439
10.1289/ehp.10966
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127190
10.1007/s11356-012-0964-3
10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.005
10.1021/es902987d
10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.005
10.1007/s10661-021-09626-6
10.1007/s43630-021-00101-2
10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118011
10.1021/es071445r
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.197
10.1016/B978-0-12-813736-9.00011-8
10.1186/s12302-014-0036-z
10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.043
10.1016/j.biochi.2009.06.019
10.1002/etc.5620111205
10.1016/j.envint.2021.106625
10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.003
10.3389/fmars.2015.00114
10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.07.021
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.164
10.1016/0025-326X(93)90497-8
10.1007/s10646-014-1255-1
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.101
10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.05.011
10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.034
10.3354/meps07451
10.3354/meps140091
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.016
10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.07.020
10.1021/es0496470
10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.02.012