El derecho de resistencia en la modernidad otoñal

  1. Francisco Carpintero Benítez
Journal:
Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos

ISSN: 0716-5455

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 40

Pages: 505-533

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4067/S0716-54552018000100505 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Abstract: The Since ranged Aristotelian thought in Europe, from the 13th century, the political-juridical contractualism won ground. The idea of the contract determines that the other party is released from their commitments and this requirement, in the area of politics, involves recourse to moral or physical violence. Second Scholasticism Spanish theologians and Jurists pointed out vigorously this contractual requirement; but his theories were lost as it advanced the modern age. Monarchist theory reaches its culmination in the 18th century, and the author examines the works of leading lawyers of this century to observe their attitude before the power acting unjustly. These authors were inconsequential because they emphasized the contractual origin of power but they refused the right of resistance against injustice; only Daniel Nettelbladt seemed to have in has diluted this right of the people or populus.

Bibliographic References

  • Achenwall, J. G. (1781). Iuris naturalis pars posterior complectens jus familiae, jus publicum et jus gentium in usum auditorium.
  • Carpintero Benítez, Francisc. (1989). La Cabeza de Jano.
  • Carpintero Benítez, Francisc. (1991). Obligatoriedad y derecho. XII Jornadas de Filosofía Jurídica y Social. Universidad de Oviedo.
  • Carpintero Benítez, Francisc. (2003). El desarrollo de la facultad individual en la Escolástica. El derecho subjetivo en su historia. 35-288
  • Carpintero Benítez, Francisc. (2004). Imputatio. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto. 81. 25-78
  • Carpintero Benítez, Francisc. (1988). La Modernidad jurídica y los católicos. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho. 5. 383-412
  • Daries, J. G. (1764). Institutiones jurisprudentiae universalis in quibus omnia juris naturae, socialis et gentium explanantur.
  • Daries, J. G. (1767). Systema elementare universae jurisprudentiae naturalis in usum praelectionum academicarum adornatum.
  • Feuerbach, P. J. A. (1798). Anti-Hobbes oder über die Grenzen der höchsten Gewalt und das Zwangsrecht der Bürger gegen den Oberherrn.
  • Gierke, Otto . (1981). Johannes Althusjus und die Entwicklung der naturrechtlichen Staatstheorien. 7. Scientia Verlag. Aalen.
  • (1744). Erläuterung über Samuelis Pufendorfii zwey Bücher De Officio hominis et civis.
  • Guzmán Brito, Alejandr. (2003). Historia de la denominación del derecho-facultad como ‘subjetivo’. Revista de Estudios Histórico Jurídicos. 25. 407
  • Heineccjus, J. G. (1829). Elementa juris naturae et gentium. Commoda auditoribus methodo adornata. Cum notis sacerdotii Andreae Cantoris Amato.
  • Hobbes, T. (1839). Leviathan, or the matter, form and power of a Commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil.
  • Kant, I,Córdova, . (1978). Principios metafísicos de la doctrina del Derecho. UNAM. México.
  • Nettelbladt, . (1767). Systema elementare universae jurisprudentiae naturalis in usum praelectionum academicarum adornatum.
  • Schmidt, nota. (1801). Versuch einer Grundlage des Naturrechts.
  • Schott, B. Chr. Fr. (1784). Dissertationes juris naturalis.
  • Vattel, Emerico d. (1781). Iuris naturalis pars posterior complectens jus familiae, jus publicum et jus gentium in usum auditorium.
  • Wolff, Christia. (1748). Pars octava, sive ultima de Imperio publico seu jure civitatis in qua omne jus publicum universale demonstrantur et verioris politicae inconcussa fundamentum ponuntur.