Working draftClassifications of interventions in mental health care. An expert review

  1. G. Castelpietra
  2. L. Salvador-Carulla
  3. A.-H. Almborg
  4. A. Fernandez
  5. R. Madden
Revista:
European journal of psychiatry

ISSN: 0213-6163

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 31

Número: 4

Páginas: 127-144

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.EJPSY.2017.10.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of psychiatry

Resumen

Background and objectives Specific classifications of mental health interventions have encountered many issues in their integration into a general classification of interventions. Nonetheless, there has not been any previous review on the content and structure of current classifications in relation to mental health care. This expert review aimed to compare the mental health interventions provided in a series of reference classification systems for the incorporation of mental health care into the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI). Methods Twelve classifications are described with regards to the structure of the classification (unit of analysis, sections, multiaxiality, granularity) and context of utilization (purpose, descriptors, neutrality, interoperability and implementation). Results Major problems identified include a granularity unbalance (i.e. differences in the number of codes and its specificity with other areas such as rehabilitation), unclear units of analysis (i.e. differences between procedures, interventions, packages of care and care programs), lack of clearly stated evidence-based interventions in a mental health context; and lack of a well-defined taxonomical tree. An ontology approach to the definition of the different entities involved in the throughput of mental care, including their hierarchical relationships and conceptual map, may have contributed to the failure of previous systems together with the development of systems to classify mental health interventions separate from generic health interventions. Conclusions The present review provides additional ground for the development of the ICHI knowledge-base and highlights the importance of taxonomical disambiguation and international comparability in the development and implementation of classifications of mental care interventions.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • V. Patel, D. Chisholm, R. Parikh, F.J. Charlson, L. Degenhardt, T. Dua, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet, 8 (2015), pp. 00390-00396
  • International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) Alpha version [press release] (2016) http://mitel.dimi.uniud.it/ichi
  • International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP) [press release]. Geneve, Switzerland (2008) Updated 2015
  • G.M. Bulechek, H.K. Butcher, J.M. Dochterman, C. Wagner. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) (6th ed.), Elsevier/Mosby, St Louis (2013)
  • Common Language for Psychotherapy (CLP) procedures [press release] (2014) http://www.commonlanguagepsychotherapy.org/index.php?id=76
  • L. Sibilia, S. Borgo. Common language for psychotherapy procedures. The first 80. Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany (2010) www.commonlanguagepsychotherapy.org
  • International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) [press release] (2016) https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/2016-ICD-10-PCS-and-GEMs.html
  • Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 8th Edition [press release]. USA (2015)
  • Canadian Institute for health Information. Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) (2012) http://www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/internet/en/document/standards+and+data+submission/standards/classification+and+coding/codingclass_cci
  • Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Coding Standards for Version 2015, ICD-10-CA and CCI (2015) https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productFamily.htm?locale=en&pf=PFC2785&lang=en&media=0
  • Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures, 4th Revision version 4.7 (OPCS-4.7) [press release]. United Kingdom (2016)
  • Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux (CCAM), version 41 [press release]. France (2015)
  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Development of a prototype Australian Mental Health Intervention classification: a working paper. AIHW, Canberra (2013)
  • Deutsche Rentenversicherung. Klassifikation Therapeutischer Leistungen (KTL). Germany (2015)
  • National Centre for Classification in Health. Australian Classification of Health Interventions (ACHI) (9th ed.) (2014)
  • The International Classification of Mental Health Care (ICMHC) [press release]. Department of Social Psychiatry University of Groningen, Netherlands: WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health (1996)
  • A. Gustavsson, M. Svensson, F. Jacobi, C. Allgulander, J. Alonso, E. Beghi, et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 21 (2011), pp. 718-779
  • WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) [press release]. Geneve (2010)
  • S. Hanser, A. Zaiss, S. Schulz. Health Care Procedures Comparison of the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) with the CCAM Basic Coding System. Methods Inf Med, 48 (2009), pp. 540-545
  • B.T. Paviot, R. Madden, L. Moskal, A. Zaiss, C. Bousquet, A. Kumar, et al. Development of a new international classification of health interventions based on an ontology framework. A. Moen, S.K. Andersen, J. Aarts, P. Hurlen (Eds.), User Centred Networked Health Care. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 169 (2011), pp. 749-753
  • S. Hanser, A. Zaiss, M. Cumerlato, L. Best, R. Madden. ICHI Transition from ICD-9-CM Volume 3. C607. World Health Organization, Family of International Classification Network Annual Meeting, Beijing, China (2013) http://apps.who.int/classifications/network/meeting2013/en/
  • S.W. Tu, C. Nyulas, M. Tierney, A. Syed, R. Musacchio, T.B. Üstün, et al. A Content Model for Health Interventions. C601. World Health Organization – Family of International Classification Network Annual Meeting, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (2014). http://www.who.int/classifications/network/meeting2014/en/
  • N.R. Hardiker, N. Fortune, C.C. Bartz, R. Madden. Making nursing visible in health information systems. C618. World Health Organization, Family of International Classification Network Annual Meeting, Beijing, China (2013). http://apps.who.int/classifications/network/meeting2013/en/
  • L. Salvador-Carulla, J. Alvarez-Galvez, C. Romero, M.R. Gutierrez-Colosia, G. Weber, D. McDaid, et al. Evaluation of an integrated system for classification, assessment and comparison of services for long-term care in Europe: the eDESDE-LTC study. BMC Health Serv Res, 13 (2013), p. 12
  • WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index (2014). http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/
  • C. Schmidt, R. Yowell, E. Jaffe. CPT Coding and Documentation Update – CPT Coding for Psychiatric Care CPT Handbook for Psychiatrists, Fourth Edition. American Psychiatric Publishing (2014) https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/Practice-Management/Coding-Reimbursement-Medicare-Medicaid/Coding-Reimbursement/CPT-Coding-Psychiatric-Care-Background-Material-2014.pdf
  • A. de Jong. Development of the International Classification of Mental Health Care (ICMHC). Acta Psychiatrica Scand, 102 (2000), pp. 8-13
  • B. Collins, K. Jansen. Hospitalized Adult Mental Health Client. International Council of Nurses, Geneva, Switzerland (2013)
  • P. Escalada-Hernandez, P. Munoz-Hermoso, E. Gonzalez-Fraile, B. Santos, J.A. Gonzalez-Vargas, I. Feria-Raposo, et al. A retrospective study of nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions for patients with mental disorders. Appl Nurs Res, 28 (2015), pp. 92-98
  • E.D. Thome, R.C. Centena, A.D. Behenck, M. Marini, E. Heldt. Applicability of the NANDA-I and Nursing Interventions Classification Taxonomies to Mental Health Nursing Practice. Int J Nurs Knowl, 25 (2014), pp. 168-172
  • G. Castelpietra, A.H. Almborg, N. Fortune. Classification of interventions in mental health care: the ICHI way. Newslett WHO-FIC, 14 (2016)
  • A. Almborg, N. Fortune, M. Cumerlato, C. Sykes, L. Berg, L. Salvador-Carulla, et al. ICHI Alpha 2016 – focusing on Interventions to improve the Environment and Health-related Behaviour. C602. World Health Organization, Family of International Classification Network Annual Meeting, Tokyo, Japan (2016) http://apps.who.int/classifications/network/meeting2016/en/
  • R. Lau, F. Stevenson, B.N. Ong, K. Dziedzic, S. Treweek, S. Eldridge, et al. Achieving change in primary care-effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 5 (2015), p. 16
  • P. Craig, P. Dieppe, S. Macintyre, S. Michie, I. Nazareth, M. Petticrew. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337 (2008), p. a1655
  • B. Marchal, S. Van Belle, V. De Brouwere, S. Witter, G. Kegels. Complexity in health; consequences for research & evaluation. FEM Health (2014) FEM Health discussion paper. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/femhealth/documents/Deliverables/Complexity_Working_paper.pdf
  • V.J. Bird, C. Le Boutillier, M. Leamy, J. Williams, S. Bradstreet, M. Slade. Evaluating the feasibility of complex interventions in mental health services: standardised measure and reporting guidelines. Br J Psychiatry, 204 (2014), pp. 316-321
  • M. Campbell, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Haines, A.L. Kinmonth, P. Sandercock, D. Spiegelhalter, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J, 321 (2000), pp. 694-696
  • M.S. Lee, J. Choi, P. Posadzki, E. Ernst. Aromatherapy for health care: an overview of systematic reviews. Maturitas, 71 (2012), pp. 257-260
  • P.L.A. Schoenberg, A.S. David. Biofeedback for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 39 (2014), pp. 109-135
  • R. Denson. Narcotherapy in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorders: a report of two cases. J Psychoactive Drugs, 41 (2009), pp. 199-202
  • G. Leavey, M. King. The devil is in the detail: partnerships between psychiatry and faith-based organisations. Br J Psychiatry, 191 (2007), pp. 97-98
  • Mental health action plan 2013-2020 [press release]. Geneve (2013)
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet