Pressures for sustainability and strategic responses on employment relationshipsthe role of the HR manager

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.1177/109821409301400208.
• Aguilera-Caracuel, J., & Guerrero-Villegas, J. (2018). How Corporate Social Responsibility Helps MNEs to Improve their reputation. The moderating effects of geographical diversification and operating in developing regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 355–372. doi:10.1002/ csr.1465.
• Alqudah, I. H. A., Carballo-Penela, A., & Ruzo-Sanmartin, E. (2022). High-performace human resource management practices and readiness for change: An integrative model including affective commitment, employees’ performance, and the moderating role of hierarchy culture. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1). doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100177.
• Anlesinya, A., & Susomrith, P. (2020). Sustainable human resource management: A systematic review of a developing field. Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(3), 295– 324. doi:10.1108/JGR-04-2019-0038.
• Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020). Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? Human Resource Management Review, 30,(3) 100705. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705.
• Baker, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 724–736. doi:10.1108/aaaj-08-2012-01079.
• Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. doi:10.5465/1556363. Bar-Haim, A., & Karassin, O. (2018). A multilevel model of responsibility towards employees as a dimension of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management & Sustainability, 8(3), 1–15. doi:10.5539/jms.v8n3p1.
• Barrena-Martínez, J., Lopez-Fern
  
  andez, M., & Romero-Fernandez, P. M. (2019). Towards a
  configuration of socially responsible human resource management policies and practices: Findings from an academic consensus. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(17), 2544–2580. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1332669.
• Boiral, O. (2002). Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Plannig, 35(3), 291–317. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00047-X.
• Bornay-Barrachina, M., De la Rosa-Navarro, D., Lopez-Cabrales, A., &
  Valle-Cabrera, R. (2012). Employment relationships and firm innovation: The double role of human capital. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 223–240. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00735.x.
• Bornay-Barrachina, M., Lopez-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2017). How do employ-
  ment relationships enhance firm innovation? The role of human and social capital. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(9), 1363–1391. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1155166.
• Brewster, C., Hegewisch, A., & Mayne, L. (1994). Flexible working practices: The controversy and the evidence. In C. Brewster, & A. Hegewisch (Eds.), Policy and practice in european human resource management: The price waterhouse cranfield survey (pp. 35−49). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315231426-11.
• Brewster, C., & Larsen, H. (1992). Human Resource Management in Europe: Evidence from ten countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3), 409–434. doi:10.1080/09585199200000157.
• Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (2016). A model for implementing a sustainability strategy through HRM practices. Business and Society Review, 121(4), 465–495. doi:10.1111/ basr.12099.
• Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003. doi:10.2307/1556423.
• Clemens, B. W., & Douglas, T. J. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1205–1213. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.04.002.
• Colomy, P. (1998). Neofunctionalism and neoinstitutionalism: Human agency and interest in institutional change. Sociological forum: 13 (pp. 265−300). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers. doi:10.1023/a:1022193816858.
• De Prins, P., Van Beirendonck, L., De Vos, A., & Segers, J. (2014). Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the Respect Openness Continuity (ROC) model. Management Revue, 25(4), 263–284. doi:10.1688/mrev-2014-04-Prins Doi.
• Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039. doi:10.5465/256722. Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166. doi:10.1002/ (sici)1097-0266(199902)20:2%3C147::aid-smj11%3E3.0.co;2-q.
• DeSarbo, W., Di Benedetto, A., Song, M., & Sinha, I. J. (2005). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: Uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 47–74. doi:10.1002/smj.431.
• Díaz-Carrion, R., Lopez-Fernandez, M., & Romero-Fernandez, P. (2018). Developing a sustainable HRM system from a contextual perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1143–1153. doi:10.1002/ csr.1528.
• Díaz-Carrion, R., L
  opez-Fern
  andez, M., & Romero-Fernandez, P. M. (2021). Constructing
  an index for comparing human resources management sustainability in Europe. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 120–142. doi:10.1111/1748- 8583.12286.
• Diaz-Fern
  andez, M., Lopez-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2020). Strength of HRM
  systems and perceived organizational support as determinants of employment relationships: The perspective of HR managers and workers’ representatives. Business Research Quarterly, 1–15. doi:10.1177/2340944420977506.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160 doi: 2307/2095101.
• Docherty, P., Forslin, J., & Shani, A. B. (2002). Creating sustainable work systems: Emerging perspectives and practice. Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203995389. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65– 91. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.
• Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable human resource management. A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Heidelberg.
• Farndale, E., & Paauwe, J. (2018). SHRM and context: Why firms want to be as different as legitimately possible. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 5(3), 202–210. doi:10.1108/joepp-04-2018-0021.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
• Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 350– 382. doi:10.5465/256833.
• Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2017). Ideology in HRM scholarship: Interrogating the ideological performativity of ‘New Unitarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 663–678. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z.
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Analisis multivariante
  . Madrid: Prentice Hall Iberia.
• Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593–627. doi:10.2307/2393338.
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology of selective exposure research: Introduction to the special issue. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3−4), 145–146. doi:10.1080/19312458.2013.845500.
• Jollands, S., Akroyd, C., & Sawabe, N. (2015). Core values as a management control in the construction of “sustainable development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(2), 127–152. doi:10.1108/QRAM-04-2015-0040.
• Kepes, S., & Delery, J. E. (2007). HRM systems and the problem of internal fit. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, P. M. Wright (Eds.), The handbook of human resource management (pp. 385−404). Oxford: Oxford University Press pages.
• Kochan, T. A., McKersie, R. B., & Capelli, P. (1984). Strategic choice and industrial relations theory. Industrial Relations,, 23(1), 16–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.1984. tb00872.x.
• Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233. doi:10.5465/3069293.
• Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089. doi:10.1080/ 09585192.2013.816863.
• Kreuzer, S. (2017). Explaining organizational susceptibility to coercive pressure: Results from a field experiment on e-invoicing IOIS adoption. Information System e-Business Management, 15(1), 159–195. doi:10.1007/s10257-016-0314-y.
• Lavandoski, J., Pinto, P., Silva, J. A., & Vargas- Sanchez, A. (2016). Causes and effects of
  wine tourism development in wineries: The perspective of institutional theory. International. Journal of Wine Business Research, 28(3), 266–284. doi:10.1108/ijwbr08-2015-0032.
• Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (2003). Human resource management in the knowledge economy. New challenges, new roles, new capabilities. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. doi:10.5465/ame.2003.10025210.
• Lenssen, J. J., Dentchev, N., & Roger, L. (2014). Sustainability, risk management and governance: Towards an integrative approach. Corporate Governance, 14(5), 670–684. doi:10.1108/CG-07-2014-0077 Doi:.
• Lewis, A. C., Cardy, R. L., & Huang, L. S. R. (2019). Institutional theory and HRM: A new look. Human Resource Management Review, 29(3), 316–335. doi:10.1016/j. hrmr.2018.07.006.
• Llamas-Sanchez, R., Garcia-Morales, V., & Martin-Tapia, I. (2013). Factors affecting institutional change: A study of the adoption of Local Agenda 21 in Spain. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 1045–1070. doi:10.1108/jocm-03- 2012-0037.
• Longoni, A. (2014). HRM and organisational practices in operations: The impact on environmental and social sustainability, sustainable operations strategies. (pp. 13−20). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06352-2_2.
• Loor-Zambrano, H. Y., Santos-Roldaan, D. L., & Palacios-Florencio, B. (2022). Relationship CSR and employee commitment: Mediating effects of internal motivation and trust. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(2). doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100185.
• Lopez-Cabrales, A., & DeNisi, A. (2021). The road to more sustainable
  firms in the face of a pandemic: Changes needed in employment relationships. Business Research Quarterly, 24(3), 241–248. doi:10.1177/23409444211017913.
• Lopez-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2020). Sustainable HRM strategies and employ-
  ment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Human Resource Management Review, 30,(3) 100689. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100689.
• Marsden, D. (1999). A theory of employment systems: Micro-foundations of societal diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.4000/sdt.31252. Mayrhofer, W., Gooderham, P., & Brewster, C. (2019). Context and HRM: Theory, evidence, and proposals. International Studies of Management and Organization, 49(4), 355–371. doi:10.1080/00208825.2019.1646486.
• Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to lisrel and eqs. New York: Springer. doi:10.2307/3152154.
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002.
• Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697–713. doi:10.1002/ (sici)1097-0266(199710)18:9%3C697::aid-smj909%3E3.0.co;2-c.
• Ozdora-Aksak, E., & Atakan-Duman, S. (2016). Gaining legitimacy through CSR: An analysis of Turkey’s 30 largest corporations. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25 (3), 238–257. doi:10.1111/beer.12114.
• Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273904.001.0001.
• Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. (2003). Challenging `strategic HRM’ and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(3), 56–70. doi:10.1111/J.1748-8583.2003.TB00098.X.
• Pasamar, S., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2013). Work- life balance under challenging financial and economic conditions. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 961–974. doi:10.1108/ijm-07-2013-0172.
• Rincon-Rold
  
  an, F., & Lopez-Cabrales, A. (2022a). Linking organisational values and sus-
  tainability: The role of AMO practices. Personnel Review. doi:10.1108/pr-06-2020- 0414.
• Rincon-Rold
  
  an, F., & Lopez-Cabrales, A. (2022b). The impact of employment relation-
  ships on firm sustainability. Employee Relations, 44(2), 386–406. doi:10.1108/er12-2020-0522.
• Roca-Puig, V. (2019). The circular path of social sustainability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 916–924. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.078.
• Rothenberg, S. (2003). Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1783–1802.
• Schramm, J. (2011). Promoting sustainability. HR Magazine, 56(3), 88.
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.1177/017084069601700309 Vol. 2.
• Shaw, J. D., Dineen, B. R., Fang, R., & Vellella, R. F. (2009). Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1016–1033. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44635525.
• Stahl, G. K., Brewster, C. J., Collings, D. G., & Hajro, A. (2020). Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Human Resource Management Review, 30, 100708. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708. Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (2000). Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 854–866. doi:10.2307/1556414.
• Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49. doi:10.2307/30036518.
• Tsui, A. S., & Wu, J. B. (2005). The new employment relationship versus the mutual investment approach: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 115–121. doi:10.1002/hrm.20052.
• Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089–1121. doi:10.2307/256928.
• UN General Assembly (2015) Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
• Van Buren, H. J., III (2020). The value of including employees: A pluralist perspective on sustainable HRM. Employee Relations, 44(3), 686–701. doi:10.1108/ER-01-2019-0041.
• Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2018). Institutional pressures and environmental management practices: The moderating effects of environmental commitment and resource availability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 52–69. doi:10.1002/bse.1983.
• Wang, D., Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Y., & Ma, L. (2003). Employment relationships and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 511–535. doi:10.1002/job.213.
• Westerman, J., Bhaskara Rao, M., & Vanka, S. (2020). Sustainable Human Resource Management and the triple bottom line: Multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 30,(3) 100742. doi:10.1016/j. hrmr.2020.100742.
• Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 77–99. doi:10.1093/icc/dtj003.
• Wijethilake, C., & Lama, T. (2018). Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 143–154. doi:10.1002/bse.2245.
• Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2017). Strategic responses to institutional pressures for sustainability: The role of management control systems. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(8), 1677–1710. doi:10.1108/aaaj-07-2015- 2144.
• Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320. doi:10.1177/ 014920639201800205.
• Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of management, 27(6), 701–721. doi:10.1177/ 014920630102700607.
• Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743. doi:10.2307/2094862.