Inercia e innovación en la empresa familiaruna primera aproximación

  1. José Daniel Lorenzo Gómez
  2. Pedro Núñez - Cacho Utrilla
Revista:
European Journal of Family Business

ISSN: 2444-877X

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 2

Número: 2

Páginas: 23-40

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V2I2.4027 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Journal of Family Business

Resumen

Las particularidades de la innovación en el ámbito de la empresa familiar suponen un aspecto aun escasamente desarrollado en los estudios sobre estas organizaciones y, más específicamente, existen numerosas cuestiones por resolver en relación con las barreras a la innovación en la empresa familiar. La aplicación del modelo de las cinco fuerzas inerciales de Rumelt (1995) al caso concreto de la empresa familiar permite hacer una primera aproximación al estudio de los obstáculos que dificultan la innovación en la empresa familiar. Del análisis realizado se derivan una serie de proposiciones, como punto de partida para una investigación más ampl ia.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aldrich, H.E. y Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing , 18, 573 – 596.
  • Anderson, A.R., Jack, S.L. y Dodd, S.D. (2005). The Role of Family Members in Entrepreneurial Networks: Beyond the Bo undaries of the Family Firm. Family Business Review , 18 (2), 135 - 154.
  • Aronoff, C.E. (1998). Megatrends in family business. Family Business Review , 11(3), 181 - 186.
  • Autio , E y M ustakallio, M. (2003). Family firm internationalization: A model of family firm g enerational succession and internationalization strategic postures. Paper presented at the Theories of the Family Enterprise Conference, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  • Barnett , T. y K ellermanns , F. (2006). Are We Family and Are We Treated as Fa mily? Nonfamily Employees' Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837 - 854.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management , 17 (1), 99 - 120.
  • Barney , J. B. y G riffin, R. (1992). The management of organizations: Strategy, structure, behavior . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Bermejo, M. (2008). Hacia la empresa familiar líder. Una visión práctica y optimista . Prentice Hall.
  • Bigliardi, B. y Dormio, A.I. (2009). An empir ical investigation of innovation determinants in food machinery enterprises. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(2), 223 - 242.
  • Cabrera - S uárez , M. K., D e Saa - Pérez , P. y G arcía, D . (2001). The succession process from a resource and knowledge - based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37 - 46.
  • Casado, F. y Rodríguez, M.A. (2009). La RSE en la gran empresa familiar española . Instituto de la Empresa Familiar.
  • Chirico, F. y Nordqvist, M. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans - generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture,. International Small Business Journal , 28(5), 487 - 504.
  • Chrisman , J. J., C hua , J. y L itz , R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 467 - 472.
  • Chrisman , J. J., C hua , J. y S teier , L. P. ( 2003). An introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 441 - 448.
  • Chua , J., C hrisman , J. J. y S teier , L. P. (2003). Extending the Theoretical Horizons of Family Business Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 331 - 338.
  • Craig J. B. y D ibrell , C. (2006). The Natural Environment, Innovation, and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study. Family Business Review, 19(4), 275 - 288.
  • Craig, J.B. y Moores, K. (2006). A 10 - Year Longitudinal Investigation of Strategy, Systems, and Environment on Innovation in Family Firms. Family Business Review , 19 (1), 1 - 10.
  • Davis , P. y H arveston , P. (1988). The influence of fa mily on the family business sucession process:a multigenerational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22 , 31 - 53.
  • Debicki, B.J., Matherne, C.F. III, Kellermanns, F.W. y Chrisman, J.J. (2009). Family Business Research in the New Millennium: An Overview of the Who, the Where, the What, and the Why. Family Business Review , 22 (2), 151 - 166
  • Drucker, P.F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 63 (3), 67 - 72.
  • Dyer , W. G. (2006). Examining the "Family Effect" on Firm Performanc e. Family Business Review, 19 (4), 253 - 273.
  • Dyer , W.G. (1986). Cultural changes in family business . John Bassey: San Francisco.
  • Eddleston , K. A. (2008). Commentary: The Prequel to Family Firm Culture and Stewardship: The Leadership Perspective of the Found er. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6) . 1055 - 1061.
  • Ellington, E.P., Jones, R.T. y Deane, R. (1996). TQM adoption practices in family owned business. Family Business Review, 9. 5 - 14.
  • Ensley , M. D. y P earson , A. (2005). An Exploratory Comparison of the Behavioral Dynamics of Top Management Teams in Family and Nonfamily New Ventures: Cohesion, Conflict,
  • Potency, and Consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 267 - 284.
  • Erickson, T., Sorheim, R. y Reitam, B. (2003). Family Angels vs. Other Informal Investors. Family Business Review , 3 (3), 163 - 171.
  • Gallo, M.A. (1995). Empresa familiar. Texto y casos . Editorial Praxis.
  • Gersick , K., D avis , J., H ampton , M. y L ansberg S., I. (1997). Life cycles of the family business . Boston: Harvard University Press (Ed.).
  • Gómez - Mejía , L., T akacs , K., N úñez , M., Jacobson, K. y M oyano , J. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family - controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106 - 137.
  • Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109 - 122.
  • Grant, R.M. (1991). The Resource - Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review , 33 (3), 114 - 135.
  • Habbershon, T.G. y Williams, M.L. (1999). A resource - based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review , 12, 1 - 15. Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M.L. y McMillan, I.C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing , 18, 451 - 465.
  • Haynes , J., W alker , R., R owe , B. y H ong , G. (1999). The intermingling of business and family fi nances in family owned businesses. Family Business Review , 12 , 225 - 240.
  • Hoffman , J., H oelscher , M. y R itch , S. ( 2006). Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Family Capital Theory. Family Business Review , 19(2), 135 - 145.
  • Hoy, F. y Verser, T.G. (1994). Emerging Business, Emerging Field: Entrepreneurship and the Family Firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(1), 9 - 23.
  • Kellermanns , F. (2005). Family Firm Resource Management: Commentary and Extensions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 313 - 319.
  • Kets de Vries , M. (2003). Doing an Alexander: Lessons on Leadership by a Master Conqueror. European Management Journal , 2003, 21(3), 370 - 375.
  • Klein, K.J. y Sorra, J.S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation . Academy of Management Review , 21 (4), 1055 - 1080.
  • Koellinger, P. (2008). Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others?. Small Business Economics , 31 (1), 21 – 37.
  • Kogut , B. y Z ander , U. ( 1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383 - 397.
  • Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Larraza , M., W iseman , R. M., G ómez - M ejía , L. R. y W elbourne , T. M. (2007). Disentangling compensation and employment risks using the behavioral agency model. Strategic Management Journal , 28(10), 1001 - 1019.
  • Le Breton - Miller, I., Miller, D. y Lloyd, S. (2004). Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 28, 305 - 328.
  • Levering , R. y M oskowitz , M. ( 1993). The 100 Best Companies to Work For in America . (V ed.). N ew York: V Plume
  • Lorenzo Gómez, J.D. (2003). El cambio estratégico en las organizaciones . Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz.
  • Meek, W.R., Pacheco, D.F. y York, J.G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing , 25 (5), 496 - 509.
  • Miles, R.E. y Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Processes . McGraw - Hill, Nueva York.
  • Miller , D. L y e Breton - Miller , I. (2006). Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Ca pabilities. Family Business Review , 19(1) , 73 - 87.
  • Moores, K. (2009). Paradigms and Theory Building in the Domain of Business Families. Family Business Review , 22, 167 - 180.
  • Nelson, R.R. y Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Nuñez - Cacho, P. y Grande. F. A. (2012). Family businesses: How to measure their performance. African Journal of Business Management , 6(12), 4612 - 4621.
  • Padgett , M. Y. y M orris , K. A. (20 05). Keeping it ‘all in the family’: Does nepotism in the hiring process really benefit the beneficiary?. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies , 11(2), 34 – 45.
  • Pittino, D. y Visintin, F. (2009). Innovation and strategic types of family SMEs. A te st and extension of Miles and Snow’s configurational model, Journal of Enterprising Culture , 17, 257 - 295.
  • Rogoff, E.G., Kay, R. y Heck, Z. (2003) Editorial: Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: recognizing family as the oxygen that fe eds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (5), 559 - 566.
  • Rumelt, R.P. (1995). Inertia and transformation. En MONTGOMERY, C.A. (1995). Resource - Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis (pp 101 - 132). . Kluwer Academic Publishers
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,.
  • Sciascia, S., Chirico, F. y Mazzola, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance in Family - owned Firms: The Role of Family Management. 6 th EIASM Workshop on Family Firms Management Research , Barcelona, June 6 - 8.
  • Schein , E. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12(13): 13 - 28.
  • Schulze , W. S., L ubatkin , M. H., D ino , R. N. y B uchholtz , A. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99 - 116.
  • Sharma, P. Chrisman, J.J. y Chua, J.H. (1997). Strategic management of family business: Past research and future cha llenges. Family Business Review , 10 (1), 1 - 35.
  • Sirmon , D. y H itt , M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339 - 358.
  • Steier , L. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family - financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing , 18, 597 – 618.
  • Steier , L. (2007). New venture creation and organization: A familial sub - narra tive. Journal of Business Research , 60, 1099 – 1107.
  • Steier , L. (2009). Where Do New Firms Come From? Households, Family Capital, Ethnicity, and the Welfare Mix. Family Business Review , 22 (3), 273 – 278.
  • Steier , L. P. (2001). Next - generation entrepreneurs and succesion: an exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14(4), 353 - 367.
  • Tàpies, J. (2009): Empresa familiar: ni tan pequeña, ni tan joven . Fundación Jesús Serra.
  • Tagiuri , R. y D avis , J. 1996. Bivalent Attributes of Family Business. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199 - 208.
  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. y Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal , 18 (7), 509 - 533.
  • Tokarczyk , J., H ansen , E., G reen , M., y D own , J. (2007). A Resource - Based View and Market Orientation Theory Examination of the Role of "Familiness" in Family Business Success. Family Business Review, 20(1), 17 - 31.
  • Tylecote , A. y V isintin , F. (2007). A New Taxonomy of National Systems of Corporate Governance. En L.Mjøset, T.Clausen (eds.) Capitalisms Compared , Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI.
  • Van De Ven, A.H., Polley, D.E., Garud, R. y Venkataraman, S. (2001). El viaje de la innovación. El desarrollo de una cu ltura organizacional para innovar. Oxford University Press México.
  • Varis, M. y Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management , 13 (2), 128 - 154.
  • Veciana, J .M. (1999). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa , 8 (3), 11 - 36.
  • Webb , J., K etchen , D., y I reland , R. D. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship within family - controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 67 - 77.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource - based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal , 5, 171 - 180.
  • Zahra , S . A. (2005). Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms. Family Business Review,18 (1), 23 - 40.
  • Zahra , S. A., H ayton , J. C., y S alvato , C. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship in Family vs. Non - Family Firms: A Resource - Based Analysis of the Effect of Organizationa l Culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 28 (4) , 363 - 381.
  • Zahra , S., N eubaum , D. y L arrañeta , B . (2007). Knowledge Conversion Capability and the Performance of Corporate and University Spin - offs .. Industrial and Corporate Change . 16, 569 - 609.
  • Zahra , S.A., G edajlovic , E. N eubaum , D. y S chulman , J.M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing . 24 (5), 519 - 532.