Diferencias de género en la carrera académica en contabilidad en la universidad pública española

  1. M. Teresa Duarte Atoche 1
  2. Paula Isabel Rodríguez Castro 1
  3. Joaquina Laffarga Briones 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Revista:
Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

ISSN: 1138-4891

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 26

Número: 2

Páginas: 181-199

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/RCSAR.464441 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

Resumen

En las Universidades Públicas Españolas la carrera académica es prolongada en el tiempo pues, por término medio, un académico en Contabilidad logra la cátedra en 14 años desde que obtiene el doctorado. La evidencia empírica muestra diferencias entre las carreras académicas de hombres y mujeres. Las mujeres continúan estando infrarrepresentadas en la categoría de mayor rango y parece que existe lo que se ha interpretado en la academia como "tubería con fugas", es decir, a lo largo de la carrera académica las mujeres sufren mayor desgaste que los hombres. Nuestro trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar si en el área de Contabilidad de la universidad pública española existen diferentes velocidades en las carreras académicas entre hombres y mujeres y, de ser así, analizar en qué hito de la carrera comienza la fuga del talento femenino y qué factores familiares, institucionales o de producción investigadora lo explican. Para ello, hemos recabado mediante una encuesta los datos de 353profesores y profesoras del área de Contabilidad de las universidades públicas españolas que abarca un horizonte temporal desde 1959 hasta 2019 y usamos modelos de probabilidad para explorar el tiempo de promoción y sus posibles variables explicativas. Los resultados indican que la trayectoria de hombres y mujeres académicas es similar hasta alcanzar la titularidad pero, sin embargo, la probabilidad de las mujeres para lograr la cátedra disminuye fuertemente con respecto a la de los hombres, reduciéndose significativamente el número de catedráticas frente a catedráticos. Asimismo, de los factores que pueden explicar este hecho, es la maternidad uno de los más relevantes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Academias Nacionales (2011). Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mat- hematics Faculty. Washington, DC: Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mat- hematics Faculty, Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, andMedicine [of] Policy and Global Affairs [and] Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, the National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press.
  • Acker, J. (1989). Doing comparable worth: Gender, class and pay equity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158.
  • Aiston, S. J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: an international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09540253.2015.1024617
  • Auriol, E., Friebel, G., & Wilhelm, S. (2019). Women in European Economics. Mimeo. Available at https://women-economics.com/download/Auriol. Friebel.Wilhelm_2019_Women.in.Economics.pdf
  • Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Cioni, M., & Pisani, C. (2014). Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance. Scientometrics, 101(3), 2035-2062. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1395-3
  • Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? American Economic Review, 107(4), 1207-38. https://doi. org/10.1257/aer.20151211
  • Bayer, A., & Rouse, C. (2016) Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30 (4), 221-242. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1257/jep.30.4.221
  • Beneito, P., Boscá, J. E., Ferri, J., & García, M. (2018). Women across Subfields in Economics: Relative Performance and Beliefs. Documento de Trabajo, 06.
  • Bettio, F., & Rosselli, A. (2001). Il femminismo (involontario?) degli economisti italiani. Rivista italiana degli economisti, 6(3), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1427/3703
  • Bittman, M., & Rice, J. M. (2002). The Spectre Of Overwork: An Analysis Of Trends Between 1974 And 1997 Using Australian Time-Use Diaries. Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 12(3), 5-25.
  • Blackaby, D., Booth, A. L., & Frank, J. (2005). Outside offers and the gender pay gap: Empirical evidence from the UK academic labour market. The Economic Journal, 115(501), F81-F107. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.0013-0133.2005.00973.x
  • Blackburn, H. (2017). “The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007-2017”. Science & Technology Libraries, 36:3, 235-273. https://doi. org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658
  • Blackburn, R.T., Chapman D.W., & Cameron S.M. (1981). “Cloning” in academe: Mentorship and academic careers. Research in Higher Education, 15(4), 315-327. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF00973512
  • Blau, F. D., Currie, J. M., Croson, R. T. A., & Ginther, D. K. (2010). Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial. The American Economic Review, 100(2), 348-352. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/27805017
  • Boring, A., & Zignago S. (2018). Economics: Where Are the Women? Blog Post Posted: 2018-07-03.
  • Bosanquet, A., Mailey, A., Matthews, K. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2017). Redefining ‘early career’ in academia: a collective narrative approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(5), 890-902. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07294360.2016.1263934
  • Boschini, A., & Sjögren, A. (2007). Is Team Formation Gender Neutral? Evidence from Coauthorship Patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 325- 365. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 510764
  • Bosquet, C., Combes, P. P., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2019). Gender and promotions: evidence from academic economists in France. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121(3), 1020-1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12300
  • Botella, C., Rueda, S., López-Iñesta, E., & Marzal, P. (2019). Gender Diversity in STEM Disciplines: A Multiple Factor Problem. Entropy, 21(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ e21010030
  • Bozeman B., & Feeney, M.K. (2007). Toward a Useful Theory of Mentoring A Conceptual Analysis and Critique. Administration & Society, 39(6), 719-739. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0095399707304119
  • Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chavance, B., & Labrousse, A. (2018). Institutions and ‘Science’: The Contest about Pluralism in Economics in France. Review of Political Economy, 30, 190 209. https://doi. org/10.1080/09538259.2018.1449472
  • Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). New managerialism, new welfare? London, UK: SAGE.
  • Cea D ‘Ancona, M. A. (1998). Metodología cuantitativa: Estrategias y Técnicas de Investigación Social. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236
  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. PNAS, 108(8), 3157-3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1014871108
  • Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2016). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218- 261.
  • Cole, J.R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in Science. Scientific American, 256(2), 119-125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 24979323
  • Corsi, M., & Zacchia, G. (2014). Women Economists in Italy: A Bibliometric Analysis of their Scientific Production in the Past Decade. Working Papers CEB, 14.
  • Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., & Zacchia, G. (2017). Gendered careers: women economists in Italy.Working Papers CEB 17- 003, ULB Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., & Zacchia, G. (2018). A Case Study of Pluralism in Economics: The Heterodox Glass Ceiling in Italy. Review of Political Economy, 30(2), 172-189. https: //doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2018.1423974
  • Crabtree, S.A., & Shiel, C. (2018). Loaded dice: games playing and the gendered barriers of the academy. Gender and Education, 30 (7), 899-916. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09540253.2018.1447090
  • Cuervo-Martínez, A., & Escobar-Pérez. J. (2018). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 27-36.
  • Danell, R., & Hjerm, M. (2013). Career prospects for female university researchers have not improved. Scientometrics, 94(3), 999-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012- 0840-4
  • De Paola, M., Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2016). Are men given priority for top jobs? Investigating the glass ceiling in the Italian academia. IZA Discussion Paper, 9658.
  • De Quinto, A., Hospido, L., & Sanz, C. (2020). The Child Penalty in Spain. Banco de España, documento no. 2017.
  • Deem, R. (2009). Leading and managing contemporary UK Universities: Do excellence and meritocracy still prevail over diversity?Higher Education Policy, 22(1), 3-17. https: //doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.32
  • D’Ippoliti, C. (2017). ‘Many-Citedness’: Citations Measure More than Just Scientific Impact. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 57, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2993971 or https: //doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993971
  • Doyle, C., & Hind, P. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout and job status in female academics. Gender, Work & Organization, 5(2), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468- 0432.00047
  • Fassa, F., & Kradolfer, S. (2013). The gendering of excellence through quality criteria: The case of the Swiss national science foundation professorships in Switzerland. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(3), 189-204. https://doi. org/10.1080/13583883.2013.793379
  • Fletcher, C., Boden, R., Kent, J., & Tinson, J. (2007). Performing Women: The gendered dimensions of the uk new research economy. Gender, Work & Organization, 14(5), 433-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432. 2007.00359.x
  • Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0306312705046630
  • Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Forget, E. (1995). America women economists, 1900-1940: doctoral dissertation and research specialization.
  • Fuchs, S., von Stebut, J., & Allmendinger, J. (2001). Gender, science, and scientific organizations in Germany. Minerva, 39(2): 175-201. https://doi.org/10.1023/a: 1010380510013
  • Gallardo, M. (2021). Does maternity affect women’s careers? Perceptions of working mothers in academia. Educacion XX1, 24(1), 405-428, https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1. 26714
  • Gallen, Y. (2018). Motherhood and the gender productivity gap. Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics Working Paper, (2018-41).
  • Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In Flood, R. & Gill, R. (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. London: Routledge.
  • Ginther, D. K. (2006a). Economics of Gendered Distribution of Resources in Academia. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering: Workshop Report (pp. 56-60). Washington, DC: Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, The National Academies Press.
  • Ginther, D. K. (2006b). The Economics of Gender Differences in Employment Outcomes in Academia. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering: Workshop Report (pp. 99-112). Washington, DC: Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, The National Academies Press.
  • Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2004). Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 193-214. https: //doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162386
  • Ginther, D., & Kahn, S. (2014). Academic women’s careers in the social sciences. In A. Lanteri & J. Vromen (Eds.), The Economics of Economists: Institutional Setting, Individual Incentives, and Future Prospects (pp. 285-315).
  • Glucksmann, M. (1995). Why work? Gender and the ‘total social organization of labour’. Gender, Work & Society, 2(2), 63-75.
  • Gómez Bueno, C. (2001). Mujeres y trabajo: principales ejes de análisis. Papers: revista de sociología, 63-64, 123-140.
  • Gómez Cama, M. M., Larrán Jorge, M., & Andrades Peña, F.J. (2016). Gender differences between faculty members in higher education: A literature review of selected higher education journals. Educational Research Review, 18, 58- 69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.001.
  • Griliches, Z., & Intriligator, M.D. (1986). Handbook of Econometrics. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
  • Hansmann, R., & Schröter, D. (2018). Equal opportunities in academic careers? how mid-career scientists at ETH zurich evaluate the impact of their gender and age. Sustainability, 10(9), 3343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su10093343
  • Hengel, E. (2017). Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Cambridge Working Papers Economics (CWPE) 1753.
  • Herschberg, C., Benschop, Y., & Van den Brink, M. (2018). Precarious postdocs: A comparative study on recruitment and selection of early-career researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(4), 303-310. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scaman.2018.10.001
  • Hospido, L., & Sanz, C. (2019). Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences. Documento de Trabajo no 1918, Banco de España.
  • Huopalainen, A. S., & Satama, S.T. (2019). Mothers and researchers in the making: Negotiating ‘new’ motherhood within the ‘new’ academia.Human Relations, 72(1). https: //doi.org/10.1177/0018726718764571
  • INE INSHT (2017). Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Trabajo. 2015 6a EWCS – España. INSHT: Madrid. https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/96082/ Encuesta+Nacional+de+Condiciones+de+Trabajo+ 6%C2%AA+EWCS.pdf/abd69b73-23ed-4c7f-bf8f6b46f1998b45?t=1529925974398
  • Ivancheva, M., Lynch, M. K., & Keating, K. (2019). Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy. Gender, Work and Organization, 26, 448-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/ gwao.12350
  • Jensen, K. S. H. (2005). Women Working in Science, Enginee- ring and Technology, Higher Education and Industry: A Literature Review. IRIS (Informatics Research Institute) Salford University, Manchester.
  • Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., & Cacace, M. (2017). Addressing gender inequality in science: the multifaceted challenge of assessing impact. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx003
  • Kaminski, D., & Geisler C. (2012). Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender. Science, 335(6070), 864-866. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1214844
  • King, M.M., Bergstrom, C.T., Correll, S.J., Jacquet, J., & West, J.D. (2016). Men set their own cites high: Gender and selfcitation across fields and over time. arXiv, n. 1607.00376. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00376
  • Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J.E. (2019). Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180010
  • Lee, F. S., Pham, X., & Gu, G. (2013). The UK research assessment exercise and the narrowing of UK economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), 693-717. https: //doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet031
  • Long, J., Scott, P., Allison, D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 703-722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096282
  • Lundberg, S., & Stearns, J. (2019).Women in Economics: Stalled Progress. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (1), 3- 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.1.3
  • Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education: Commercialization, carelessness and gender. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lynn, C.D., Howells, M.E., & Stein, M.J. (2018). Family and the field: expectations of a field-based research career affect researcher family planning decisions. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0203500.
  • Maes, K., Buitendijk, S., Rahm Hallberg, I., & Mantilleri, B. (2012). Women, research and universities: Excellence without gender bias. LERU Position Papers.
  • Marini, G., & Meschitti, V. (2018). The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. Scientometrics 115: 989-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2696-8
  • Martin, J. (1994). The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization, 1(2), 401-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 135050849412011
  • Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2002). Do babies matter? Academe, 88(6), 21-27.
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2020). Científicas en Cifras 2021. Madrid.
  • Misra, J., Lundquist, J.H., & Templer, A. (2012) Gender, work, time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 300-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573- 7861.2012.01319.x
  • Morley, L. (2013). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25(1),116-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09540253.2012.740888
  • Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360. 2013.864611
  • Morrison, E., Rudd, E., & Nerad, M. (2011). Onto, Up, Off the Academic Faculty Ladder: The Gendered Effects of Family on Career Transitions for a Cohort of Social Science Ph.D.s. The Review of Higher Education, 34(4), 525-553. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0017
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (2004). Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers, NSF 04-323, Project Officer, Alan I. Rapoport (Arlington, VA,2004).
  • National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Science Resources Statistics (2011). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2011. Special Report NSF 11- 309. Arlington, VA. Disponible en: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
  • National Science Foundation (NSF). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. Special Report NSF 19-304. Alexandria, VA. Disponible en https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd
  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Cambridge, MA: Pohttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059145.015 lity. Pautasso, M. (2015). The Italian university habilitation and the challenge of increasing the representation of women in academia. Challenges, 6(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10. 3390/challe6010026
  • Perna, L.W. (2001). Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 541- 567. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40196442
  • Persson, I. (2003). Genre et economie en Suede. In J. Laufer, C. Marry, & M. Maruani (Eds.), Le travail du genre: les sciences sociales du travail a l’epreuve des differences de sexe (pp. 259-273). Paris: Editions La Decouverte.
  • Pocock, B. (2005). Work/Care Regimes: Institutions, Culture and Behaviour and the Australian Case. Gender, Work and Organization, 12 (1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1468-0432.2005.00261.x
  • Pottage, A. (1994). A unique and different subject of law. Cardozo Law Review, 16, 1161.
  • Rudd, E., Lennon, M. C., & Padilla, Y. C. (2006). A metaanalysis of gender differences in attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(12), 2888-2915.
  • Rudd, E., Morrison, E., Picciano, J., & Nerad, M. (2008). Finally Equal Footing for Women in Social Science Careers? CIRGE Spotlight on Doctoral Education. , Seattle, WA: CIRGE, University of Washington. www.cirge.washington.edu
  • Sánchez, S., Fuentes, F.J., & Ruiz, C. (2007). La perspectiva de género en el análisis de la satisfacción laboral: una aplicación empírica mediante modelos logit y probit. Cuadernos de gestión, 7(2), 55-67.
  • Sanchez de Madariaga, I., de la Rica, S., & Dolado, J.J. (2011). Libro blanco: situacion de las mujeres en la ciencia espanola. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion. https: //bit.ly/2UDCIUy.
  • Sanz-Menéndez, L., Cruz-Castro, L., & Alva, K. (2013). Time to Tenure in Spanish Universities: An Event History Analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77028. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0077028
  • Sarsons, H. (2015). Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work. Working Paper, Harvard.
  • Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423-446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1015575616285
  • Sowa, F., Staples, R., & Zapfel, S. (2018). The transformation of work in welfare state organizations: New public management and the institutional diffusion of ideas. London: Routledge.
  • Shen, H. (2013). Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature News, 495(7439), 22-24. https://doi.org/10. 1038/495022a
  • Spiegel, M. (1988). Estadística (2a edición). Madrid: Editorial McGraw Hill.
  • Stalford, H. (2005). Parenting, care and mobility in the EU: Issues facing migrant scientists. Innovation, 18(3), 361- 380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610500186805
  • Toffoletti, K., & Starr, K. (2016). Women academics and worklife balance: Gendered discourses of work and care. Gender, Work & Organization, 23, 489-504. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gwao.12133
  • Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs.
  • Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2014). Gender in academic networking: The role of gatekeepers in professorial recruitment. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 460- 492. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12060
  • Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., & Jansen, W. (2010). Transparency in academic recruitment: A problematic tool for gender equality? Organization Studies, 31(11), 1459- 1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610380812
  • Vesterlund, L. (2015). Breaking the Glass Ceiling with "No": Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Non-Promotable Tasks. Working Paper 5663, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
  • Williams, J.C. (2004). Hitting the Maternal Wall. American Association of University Professors, 90(6), 16-20. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/40252700
  • Wirth, L. (2004). Romper El “techo de cristal”: las mujeres en puestos de direccion. Madrid: Ministerio de trabajo y Asuntos sociales. Informes OIT.
  • Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2019). Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. The Lancet, 393(10171), 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4
  • Wolfinger, N.H., Mason, M.A., & Goulden, M. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Gender, marriage, and fertility in the ivory tower. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00221546.2008.11772108
  • Xie Y., & Shauman, K.A. (2003). A Women in science: career processes and outcomes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  • Ysseldyk, R., Greenaway, K.H., Hassinger, E., Zutrauen, S., Lintz, J., & Bhatia, M.P. (2019). A Leak in the Academic Pipeline: Identity and Health Among Postdoctoral Women. Front. Psychol, 10, 1297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2019.01297.
  • Zacchia, G. (2017). Diversity in Economics: A Gender Analysis of Italian Academic Production (August 2017). Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 61. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3081220 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3081220
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet