Desarrollando el marco DALI de alfabetización en datos para la ciudadanía

  1. Linda Castañeda 1
  2. Inmaculada Haba-Ortuño 1
  3. Daniel Villar-Onrubia 2
  4. Victoria I. Marín 3
  5. Gemma Tur 4
  6. José A. Ruipérez-Valiente 1
  7. Barbara Wasson 5
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia (España)
  2. 2 Universidad de Cádiz (España)
  3. 3 Universitat de Lleida (España)
  4. 4 Universitat de les Illes Balears (España)
  5. 5 Universidad de Bergen (Noruega)
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: Tendencias en la Educación Digital

Volumen: 27

Número: 1

Páginas: 289-318

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.27.1.37773 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Resumen

En la era postdigital actual, donde los datos son cada vez más omnipresentes, la gestión de datos se ha convertido en un aspecto crucial de la alfabetización digital para la ciudadanía activa. Este artículo presenta el proceso de elaboración de un marco de Alfabetización en Datos que se llevó a cabo utilizando la Teoría fundamentada como base metodológica, y el método Delphi como estrategia para conjugar la participación de expertos de diversos campos como la ciencia de datos, la educación y la alfabetización, provenientes de cuatro países, en tres rondas y media de trabajo. El resultado de este estudio es el marco DALI de alfabetización en datos para la ciudadanía, que abarca cuatro elementos principales. Tres de estos elementos están interconectados y a veces se superponen: (1) Comprender los datos, (2) Actuar a partir de los datos y (3) Comprometerse a través de los datos. Además, hay un elemento transversal, (4) Ética y Privacidad, que impregna los otros tres. El marco DALI es flexible y escalable, lo que permite su adaptación a diversos contextos internacionales, organizativos y educativos. Además, las conclusiones del artículo reflexionan sobre cómo el marco DALI puede respaldar iniciativas pedagógicas destinadas a promover la alfabetización en datos entre las personas adultas y cómo su adaptabilidad y escalabilidad lo hacen ideal para abordar las diversas necesidades y contextos encontrados en diferentes entornos educativos y organizaciones internacionales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arnab, S., Clarke, S., & Morini, L. (2019). Co‑Creativity through Play and Game Design Thinking. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.3.002
  • Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Timmermann, C. (2020). Critical literacies for a datafied society: Academic development and curriculum design in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2468
  • Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Timmermann, C. (2023). Reframing data ethics in research methods education: A pathway to critical data literacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00380-y
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Statistical Language—What are Data? Australian Bureau of Statistics. https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/Home/Statistical+Language+-+what+are+data
  • Becuwe, H., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., Thys, J., Castelein, E., & Voogt, J. (2017). Conditions for the successful implementation of teacher educator design teams for ICT integration: A Delphi study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2789
  • Bloom, P. (2019). Monitored: Business and Surveillance in a Time of Big Data. Pluto Press.
  • Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  • Cabero, J. (2013). University teacher training in ICT. application of Delphi method for the selection of training content. Educación XX1, 17(1), 111-131. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.1.10707
  • Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
  • Calzada-Prado, J., & Marzal, M. Á. (2013). Incorporating Data Literacy into Information Literacy Programs: Core Competencies and Contents. Libri, 63(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0010
  • Carretero Gomez, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use (Scientific Analysis or Review, Technical Guidance KJ-NA-28558-EN-N (online), KJ-NA-28558-EN-C (print), KJ-NA-28558-EN-E (ePub)). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
  • Chen, Y. (2019). Exploring Design Guidelines of Using User-Centered Design in Gamification Development: A Delphi Study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(13), 1170-1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1514823
  • Chowdhury, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2019). Teachers’ Ownership Towards Using Socio-Scientific Issues for an Active Informed Citizenry. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 3834-3840. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0989
  • Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (Edición: 8). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
  • Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
  • El-Jarn, H., & Southern, G. (2020). Can co-creation in extended reality technologies facilitate the design process? Journal of Work-Applied Management, 12(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-04-2020-0022
  • European Union. (2018). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning (p. 104) [Proposal for a Council Recommendation]. European Commission.
  • Fake, H., & Dabbagh, N. (2021). The Personalized Learning Interaction Framework: Expert Perspectives on How to Apply Dimensions of Personalized Learning to Workforce Training and Development Programs. Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’21), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486011.3486503
  • Fefer, J. P., De-Urioste Stone, S., Daigle, J., & Silka, L. (2016). Using the Delphi Technique to Identify Key Elements for Effective and Sustainable Visitor Use Planning Frameworks. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016643141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016643141
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
  • Guàrdia, L., Romero, M., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2022). Desarrollo Profesional Docente más allá de la pandemia: Un estudio Delphi sobre el potencial del concepto de ecologías de aprendizaje. Educación, 31(60), Article 60. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202201.004
  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
  • Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U. M., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Assessing agency of university students: Validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2061-2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693
  • Jandrić, P., MacKenzie, A., & Knox, J. (2022). Postdigital Research: Genealogies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97262-2
  • Kippers, W. B., Poortman, C. L., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Data literacy: What do educators learn and struggle with during a data use intervention? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.001
  • Kluzer, S., & Priego, L. P. (2018). DigComp into action: Get inspired, make it happen. A user guide to the European Digital Competence Framework (JRC110624). Joint Research Centre (Seville site). https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC110624
  • Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
  • Lorenz, B., & Kikkas, K. (2014). If I Do Not Like Your Online Profile I Will Not Hire You! In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Technology-Rich Environments for Learning and Collaboration (pp. 429-439). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_42
  • Louie, J., Stiles, J., Fagan, E., Chance, B., & Roy, S. (2022). Building toward Critical Data Literacy with Investigations of Income Inequality. Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 142-163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48695987
  • Macgilchrist, F., Potter, J., & Williamson, B. (2022). Reading internationally: If citing is a political practice, who are we reading and who are we citing? Learning, Media and Technology, 47(4), 407-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2140673
  • Marin, V. I., & Castañeda, L. (2022). Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_64-1
  • Markham, A. N. (2020). Taking Data Literacy to the Streets: Critical Pedagogy in the Public Sphere. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419859024
  • Markham, A. N., & Pereira, G. (2019). Analyzing public interventions through the lens of experimentalism: The case of the Museum of Random Memory. Digital Creativity, 30(4), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1688838
  • Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
  • McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2010). Using Wordle as a Supplementary Research Tool. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 630-643. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1167
  • Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
  • Nguyen, D. (2021). Mediatisation and datafication in the global COVID-19 pandemic: On the urgency of data literacy. Media International Australia, 178(1), 210-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20947563
  • Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
  • Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
  • Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Dimensions of digital literacy based on five models of development. Cultura y Educacion, 31(2), 232–266. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1603274
  • Raffaghelli, J. E. (2019). Developing A Framework For Educators’ Data Literacy In The European Context: Proposal, Implications And Debate. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 10520-10530. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2655
  • Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
  • Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
  • Sander, I. (2020). What is critical big data literacy and how can it be implemented? Internet Policy Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.2.1479
  • Seo, E., Ryu, J., & Hwang, S. (2020). Building key competencies into an environmental education curriculum using a modified Delphi approach in South Korea. Environmental Education Research, 26(6), 890-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1733493
  • Shreiner, T. L., & Dykes, B. M. (2021). Visualizing the teaching of data visualizations in social studies: A study of teachers’ data literacy practices, beliefs, and knowledge. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(2), 262-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1850382
  • Stewart, B. E. (2023). The problem of the web: Can we prioritize both participatory practices and privacy? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), ep402. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12668
  • Sutton, M. (2008). Knowledge citizenship for active informed citizenship. South African Journal of Information Management, 10(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v10i4.335
  • Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence, 22(3), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567827
  • Vespestad, M. K., & Smørvik, K. K. (2020). Co-Creation as a Tool to Overcome Cross-Cultural Differences in Educational Experiences? Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 32(3), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2019.1685391
  • Villatoro, S., & de Benito, B. (2021). An Approach to Co-Design and Self-Regulated Learning in Technological Environments. Systematic Review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
  • Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
  • Whitton, N. (2018). Playful learning: Tools, techniques, and tactics. Research in Learning Technology, 26(0). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2035
  • Wolff, A., Gooch, D., Cavero Montaner, J. J., Rashid, U., & Kortuem, G. (2016). Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3275
  • Yates, S. J., Carmi, E., Lockley, E., Wessels, B., & Pawluczuk, A. (2021). Me and my Big Data: Understanding Citizens Data Literacies Research Report (p. 108) [Research Report]. University of Liverpool. https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/media/livacuk/humanitiesampsocialsciences/meandmybiddata/Understanding,Citizens,Data,Literacies,Research,,Report,Final.pdf
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet