Experimental psycholinguistics as an approach to the study of lexical creation

Referencias bibliográficas

• Balota, David A.; Chumbley, James I. (1984). «Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3 (10), pp. 340-357.
• Bennett, Max R.; Hacker, Peter M. S. (2006). «Language and cortical function: Conceptual developments». Progress in Neurobiology, 80, pp. 20-52.
• Beres, Anna M. (2017). «Time is of the essence: A review of electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in language research», Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 42 (4), pp. 247-255.
• Besson, Mireille; Kutas. Marta; Van Petten, Cyma (1992). «An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 (2), pp. 132-149.
• Burani, Cristina; Caramazza, Alfonso (1987). «Representation and processing of derived words». Language and Cognitive Processes, 2 (3-4), pp. 217-227.
• Cabré, M. Teresa (2021). «A multidimensional theory of neologisms». Neológica, 15, pp. 25-41.
• Carpenter, Patricia A.; Just, Marcel A. (1975). «Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification». Psychological Review, 82 (1), pp. 45-73.
• Carrol, Gareth; Conklin, Kathy (2014). «Eye-tracking multi-word units: some methodological questions». Journal of Eye Movement Research, 7, 5, pp. 1-11.
• Casasanto, Daniel; Lupyan, Gary (2015). «All concepts are ad hoc». In: Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence (eds.). The Conceptual Mind: New directions in the Study of Concepts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, pp. 543-566.
• Chen, Jinjin (2021). «Translating Chinese neologisms without knowledge of Context: An exploratory analysis of an eye-tracking and key-logging experiment». In: Carl, Michael (ed.). Explorations in empirical translation process research. Machine translation: Technologies and applications, 3. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 315-337.
• Clifton, Charles Jr.; Staub, Adrian; Rayner, Keith (2007). «Eye movements in reading words and sentences». In: Van Gompel, Roger P. G.; Fischer, Martin H.; Murray, Wayne S.; Hill, Robin L. (eds.). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Oxford/Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 341-371.
• Colé, Pascale, Beauvillain, Cécile; Segui, Juan (1989). «On the Representation and Processing of Prefixed and Suffixed Derived Words. A Differential Frequency Effect». Journal of Memory and Language, 28, pp. 1-13.
• Dahan, Delphine; Tanenhaus, Michael K. (2005). «Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition». Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12 (3), pp. 453-459.
• den Heyer, Ken; Briand, Kevin; Dannenbring, Gary L. (1983). «Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes». Memory and Cognition, 11 (4), pp. 374-381.
• Díaz Hormigo, María Tadea (2020). «Precisiones para una caracterización lingüística de la neología semántica». ELUA, 34, pp. 73-94.
• Díaz Hormigo, María Tadea; Varo Varo, Carmen (2012). «Neology and Cognition». In: Eizaga Rebollar, Bárbara (ed.). Linguistic Insights, 158. Studies in Linguistics and Cognition. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 15-34.
• Duchowski, Andrew (2007). Eye tracking methodology. Theory and practice. Second edition. Clemson (GB): Springer London.
• Forster, Keneth I.; Shen, Di (1996). «No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, pp. 696-713.
• Gordon, Barry (1983). «Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity». Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp. 24-44.
• Gordon, Barry; Alfonso Caramazza (1982). «Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity». Brain and Language, 15, pp. 143-160.
• Geiger, Odie (1999). «Metaphors and the Mental Lexicon». Brain and Language, 68, pp. 190-198.
• Hagoort, Peter; Brown, Colin; Osterhout Lee (1999): «The neurocognition of syntactic processing», In Peter Hagoort and Colin Brown (eds.). The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 273-316.
• Haro, Juan; Guasch, Mark; Vallès, Blanca; Ferré, Pilar (2017). «Is pupillary response a reliable index of word recognition? Evidence from a delayed lexical decision task». Behavior research methods, 49, pp. 1930-1938.
• Harston, J. Alex; Faisal. A. Aldo (2022). «Methods and models of eye-tracking in natural environment». In: Stuart, Samuel (ed.). Eye tracking: Background, methods, and applications. Neuromethods, 183. New York: Humana Press/Springer, pp. 49-68.
• Hino, Yasushi; Lupker, Stephen J. (1996). «Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22 (6), pp. 1331-1356.
• Hino, Yasushi, Lupker, Stephen J.; Pexman, Penny M. (2002). «Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28 (4), pp. 686-713.
• Huettig, Falk; Rommers, Joost; Meyer, Antje S. (2011). «Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation». Acta Psychologica, 137 (2), pp. 151-171.
• Jacob, Robert J. K.; Karn, Keith S. (2003). «Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises». In: Hyönä, Jukka; Radach, Ralph; Deubel, Heiner (eds.). The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. North-Holland: Elsevier Science, pp. 573–605.
• James, Carlton T. (1975). «The role of semantic information in lexical decisions». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1 (2), pp. 130-136.
• Kiger, John I.; Glass, Arnold L. (1983). «The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target». Memory and Cognition, 11(4), pp. 356-365.
• Koornneef, Arnout (2021). «The processing signature of anticipatory reading: an eye-tracking study on lexical predictions». Linguistics, 59 (2), pp. 449-479.
• Koriat, Asher (1981). «Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association». Memory and Cognition, 9 (6), pp. 587-598.
• Kotz, Sonja A.; Holcomb, Phillip J.; Kounios, John (1992). «A comparison of semantic and repetition priming: Event-related potential evidence». Psychophysiology, 29 (4A), p. S46.
• Kutas, Marta (1997). «Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures». Psychophysiology, 34 (4), pp. 383-398.
• Kutas, Marta; Hillyard, Steven (1980). «Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity». Science, 4427 (207), pp. 203-205.
• Lavale-Ortiz, Ruth M. (2019). «Bases para la fundamentación teórica de la neología y el neologismo: la memoria, la atención y la categorización». Círculo de Lingüistica Aplicada a la Comunicación, 80, pp. 201-227.
• Llopart Saumell, Elisabet; Loureda Lamas, Óscar; Cabré Castellví, M. Teresa; Freixa Aymerich, Judit (2014). «An experimental approach to the study of neologisms». HULC Lab Day Conference. Psycholinguistik zum Anfassen, Poster, 6th November 2014. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Language and Cognition Lab.
• Luck, Steven; Kappenman, Emily (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford university press.
• Marslen-Wilson, William (1992). Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge, MA, London, England: The MIT Press.
• Marslen-Wilson, William; Tyler, Lorraine (1980). «The temporal structure of spoken language understanding». Cognition, 8, pp. 1-71.
• McNamara, Timothy P.; Altarriba, Jeanette (1988). «Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions». Journal of Memory and Language, 27 (5), pp. 545-559.
• Meunier, Fanny; Longtin, Catherine-Marie (2007). «Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing». Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 457-471.
• Meyer, David E.; Schvaneveldt, Roger W. (1971). «Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations». Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90 (2), pp. 227-234.
• Mitchell, Penny F.; Andrews, Sally; Ward, Philip B, (1993). «An event-related potential study of semantic congruity and repetition in sentence-reading task: Effects of context change». Psychophysiology, 30, pp. 496-509.
• Morrison, Catriona M.; Ellis, Andrew W. (1995). «Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (1), pp. 116–133.
• Neely, James H., Keefe, Dennis E.; Ross, Kent L. (1989). «Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (6), pp. 1003-1019.
• Penas Ibáñez, María Azucena; Garayzábal Heine, Elena; Hidalgo de la Guía, Irene; Ivanova, Olga; Varo Varo, Carmen (2023). «Enfoques y retos actuales de la neuropedagogía y la neurolingüística». In: Esteban Moreno, Rosa M., Barros Camargo, Claudia de; Quijano López, Rocío (coords.) Claves de la neuropedagogía. Barcelona: Octaedro, pp. 59-85.
• Perea, Manuel, Rosa, Eva; Gómez, Consolación (2002). «Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? ». Memory and Cognition, 30 (1), pp. 34-45.
• Pollatsek, Alexander, Perea, Manuel; Carreiras, Manuel (2005). «Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task». Memory and Cognition, 33 (3), pp. 557-565.
• Rayner, Keith (1998). «Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research». Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), pp. 372-422.
• Richards, Jack C.; Schmidt, Richard (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. 4th edition. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
• Rondeau, Guy (1984). Introduction à la terminologie. Québec: Gaëtan Morin.
• Rugg, Michael D. (1990). «Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low frequency words». Memory and Cognition, 18, pp. 367-379.
• Rugg, Michael D.; Doyle, Michael C. (1992). «Event-related potentials and recognition memory for low and high-frequency words». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, pp. 69-79
• Schmid, Hans-Jörg (2007). «Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels». In: Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 117-138.
• Schvaneveldt, Roger W.; Meyer, David E. (1973). «Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory». In: Sylvan Kornblum (ed.). Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, pp. 395-409.
• Sereno, Sara C.; Rayner, Keith (2003). «Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials». Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, pp. 489– 493.
• Silva-Pereyra, Juan; Rivera-Gaxiola, Maritza; Aubert, Eduardo; Bosch, Jorge; Galán, Lidice; Salazar, Ariel (2003). «N400 during lexical decision tasks: a current source localization study». Clinical Neurophysiology, 114 (12), pp. 2469-2486.
• Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna; Elgort, Irina (2023). «Analysing Reading with eye tracking». In: Zufferey, Sandrine; Gygax, Pascal (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Experimental Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 1-18.
• Smith, Michael E.; Halgren, Eric (1989). «Dissociation of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions». Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, pp. 50-60.
• Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J; Eberhard, Kathleen M; Sedivy, Julie C. (1995). «Integration of visual and linguistic information spoken language comprehension». Science, 268 (5217), pp. 1632-1634.
• Tatler, Benjamin W.; Hansen, Dan Witzner; Pelz, Jeff B. (2019). «Eye movement recordings in natural settings». In: Klein, Christoph; Ettinger, Ulrich (eds.). Eye movement research. An introduction to its scientific foundations and applications. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature, pp. 549-592.
• Tobii AB. (2022, September 14). «How to work with events, intervals and Times of Interest (TOIs)». Tobii Connect. Tutorials. https:// connect.tobii.com/s/article/how-to-work-with-events-intervals-and-times-of-interest-TOIs?language=en_US.
• Trask, R. Larry (1998). A student's dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Arnold.
• Van Petten, Cyma; Kutas, Marta; Kluender, Robert; Mitchiner, Mark; Mclsaac, Heather (1991). «Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials». Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, pp. 131-150.
• Varo Varo, Carmen (2013). «Aproximación teórico-práctica al procesamiento lingüístico de neologismos léxicos». Revista Signos, 46 (81), pp. 132-152.
• Varo Varo, Carmen (2019). «Análisis comparativo temporal de los procesos de reconocimiento de usos neológicos formales y semánticos». Estudios de Lingüística, 33, pp. 195-209.
• Varo Varo, Carmen (2020). «Claves para descifrar la naturaleza neurocognitiva de la neología». In: Ruth M. Lavale-Ortiz (ed.). Claves para descifrar la naturaleza neurocognitiva de la neología. Madrid: Iberoamericana, pp. 13-33.
• Varo Varo, Carmen (2021). «Datos psicolingüísticos en torno a la vitalidad y la neologicidad de la composición culta en la prensa escrita en español». In: Poutain, Christopher J.; Wislocka Breit, Bozena (eds.). New Worlds for Old Words: the impact of cultured borrowing on the languages of Western Europe. Wilmington: Vernon Press, pp. 91-108.
• Varo Varo, Carmen (2022). «La innovación léxica en español por derivación y composición. Un acercamiento desde la perspectiva del procesamiento lingüístico». In: Fine, Ruth; Goldberg, Florinda F.; Hasson, Or (eds.). Mundos del hispanismo: una cartografía para el siglo XXI. Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana Vervuert, pp. 64-74.
• Vega Moreno, Érika; Llopart Saumell, Elisabet (2017). «Delimitación de los conceptos de novedad y neologicidad». Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, 33 (3), pp. 1416-1451.
• Young, Malcolm P.; Rugg. Michael D. (1992). «Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of ERPs in a semantic classification task». Psychophysiology, 29(6), pp. 664-676.
• Yun, Eunjeong (2021). «Comparing the reading behaviours of students with high- and low-level comprehension of scientific terms by eye movement analysis». Research in Science Education, 51, pp. 939-956.