Trends of Digital Transformation in the Shipbuilding Sector

  1. Sánchez-Sotano, Alejandro 1
  2. Cerezo-Narváez, Alberto 1
  3. Abad-Fraga, Francisco 2
  4. Pastor-Fernández, Andrés 1
  5. Salguero-Gómez, Jorge 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

  2. 2 Navantia S.A. S.M.E. Bahía de Cádiz Shipyard, Spain
Libro:
New Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Industry 4.0

Editorial: IntechOpen

ISBN: 978-1-83880-142-7,  978-1-83880-466-4,  978-1-83880-141-0

Año de publicación: 2020

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.91164 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

The new paradigms of Industry 4.0 force all the industrial sectors to face a deep digital transformation in order to be on the edge in a competitive and globalized scenario. Following this trend, the shipbuilding industry has to establish its own path to adapt itself to the digital era. This chapter aims to explore this challenge and give an outlook on the multiple transformative technologies that are involved. For that reason, a case of study is presented as a starting point, in which the digital technologies that can be applied are easily recognized. A social network analysis (SNA) is developed among these key enabling technologies (KETs), in order to stress their correlations and links. As a result, artificial intelligence (AI) can be highlighted as a support to the other technologies, such as vertical integration of naval production systems (e.g., connectivity, Internet of things, collaborative robotics, etc.), horizontal integration of value networks (e.g., cybersecurity, diversification, etc.), and life cycle reengineering (e.g., drones, 3D printing (3DP), virtual and augmented reality, remote sensing networks, robotics, etc.).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Herterich MM, Uebernickel F, Brenner W. The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial services in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2015;30:323-328
  • Favi C, Campi F, Germani M, Manieri S. Using design information to create a data framework and tool for life cycle analysis of complex maritime vessels. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;192:887-905
  • Baginski L, Pitassi C, Barbosa JGP. Technological capability in the Brazilian naval industry: A metric for offshore support vessels. RAI—Revista de Administração e Inovação. 2017;14(2):109-118
  • Kolić D, Fafandjel N, Zamarin A. Lean manufacturing methodology for shipyards. Shipbuilding. 2012;63(1):18-29
  • Eriksson T, Vahlo J, Rissanen T, Koponen A. Management myopia and project management. Insiders vs outsiders. In: ISPIM Innovation Symposium. Fukuoka, Japan: The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM); 2018. pp. 1-9
  • Vrijhoef R, Koskela L. The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 2000;6(3-4):169-178
  • Ng ST, Rose TM, Mak M, Chen SE. Problematic issues associated with project partnering—The contractor perspective. International Journal of Project Management. 2002;20(6):437-449
  • Xue X, Wang Y, Shen Q , Yu X. Coordination mechanisms for construction supply chain management in the Internet environment. International Journal of Project Management. 2007;25(2):150-157
  • Hansen MJ, Vaagen H. Collective intelligence in project groups: Reflections from the field. Procedia Computer Science. 2016;100(1877):840-847
  • Aloini D, Dulmin R, Mininno V, Ponticelli S. Key antecedents and practices for Supply Chain Management adoption in project contexts. International Journal of Project Management. 2015;33(6):1301-1316
  • Iordache O. Implementing Polytope Projects for Smart Systems, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 1st ed. Vol. 92. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 197
  • Lorenz M, Rüßmann M, Strack R, Lueth K, Bolle M. Industry 4.0. The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries. Boston, USA; 2015
  • Yao F, Keller A, Ahmad M, Ahmad B, Harrison R, Colombo AW. Optimizing the scheduling of autonomous guided vehicle in a manufacturing process. In: 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). Porto, Portugal: IEEE; 2018. pp. 264-269
  • Viriyasitavat W, Da Xu L, Bi Z, Sapsomboon A. Blockchain-based business process management (BPM) framework for service composition in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2018:1-12. (In press)
  • Lee J, Davari H, Singh J, Pandhare V. Industrial Artificial Intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters. 2018;18:20-23
  • European Commission. Artificial Intelligence for Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Digital Single Market; 2018
  • Rouco Couzo M, Quiroga Pazos M, Cebral Fernández M, Morgade Abeal R, García del Valle A, Morgade Abeal D. El Astillero 4.0: Modelado y Simulación del Astillero de Navantia-Ferrol. In: 56o Congreso de Ingeniería Naval e Industria Marítima. Madrid: Asociación de Ingenieros Navales y Oceánicos de España (AINE); 2017. pp. 1-15
  • Cagalj A, Veza I, Markovina R. Interactive networked company in shipbuilding industry. Strojarstvo. 2009;51(1):15-26
  • Ramsay S. A case for a new warship-building strategy. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India. 2012;8(1):150-156
  • Vidal LA, Marle F, Bocquet JC. Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management. 2011;29(6):718-727
  • Dao BP. Exploring and Measuring Project Complexity. College Station, TX, US: Texas A&M University; 2016
  • Wiskerke J, Veeke H, Pruijn J, Groen C, Hopman H. Knowledge framework on the execution of complex projects. The development of a functional framework using a systems approach. In: International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE). Athens, Greece: The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp); 2016. pp. 73-78
  • Hall DJ, Saias MA. Strategy follows structure! Strategic Management Journal. 1980;1(2):149-163
  • Baccarini D. The concept of project complexity: A review. International Journal of Project Management. 1996;14(4):201-204
  • Duncan J. The structure of cognition: Attentional episodes in mind and brain. Neuron. 2013;80(1):35-50
  • Bakhshi J, Ireland V, Gorod A. Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(7):1199-1213
  • Hayes S, Bennett D. Managing projects with high complexity. In: Cooke-Davies T, Crawford L, Patton JR, Stevens C, Williams TM, editors. Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a Complex World. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute; 2011. pp. 17-27
  • Cooke-Davies T. Complexity in project management and the management of complex crojects. In: Cooke-Davies T, Crawford L, Patton JR, Stevens C, Williams TM, editors. Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a Complex World. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute; 2011. pp. 1-13
  • Sistemas y Tecnología de IBM. Watson-Un sistema Diseñado para Respuestas. El futuro del diseño de sistemas optimizados de cargas de trabajo. Madrid; 2011
  • Loch C, Payne FC. Strategic management: Developing policies and strategies. In: Cooke-Davies T, Crawford L, Patton JR, Stevens C, Williams TM, editors. Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a Complex World. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute; 2011. pp. 41-55
  • Geraldi J, Maylor H, Williams T. Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated). International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2011;31(9):966-990
  • Kjersem K, Jünge GH. Improving planning process for ETO-projects: A case study. In: Nääs I, Vendrametto O, Mendes Reis J, Gonçalves RF, Silva MT, von Cieminski G, et al., editors. Advances in Production Management Systems, APMS 2016, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Vol. 488. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 927-934
  • Hellgren S. The Bayesian Model for Cruise Shipbuilding: A Process for Production efficiency and Organization. Vol. 240. Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University; 2016
  • Found P, Bicheno J. The Routledge companion to lean management. In: Netland TH, Powell DJ, editors. The Routledge Companion to Lean Management. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016. pp. 23-33
  • Sanders A, Elangeswaran C, Wulfsberg J. Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2016;9(3):811
  • NG T, Ghobakhloo M. What derives lean manufacturing effectiveness: An interpretive structural mode. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences. 2017;4(8):104-111
  • Ghobakhloo M, Azar A. Business excellence via advanced manufacturing technology and lean-agile manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2018;29(1):2-24
  • Sartal A, Vázquez XH. Implementing information technologies and operational excellence: Planning, emergence and randomness in the survival of adaptive manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2017;45:1-16
  • Tortorella G, Miorando R, Caiado R, Nascimento D, Portioli Staudacher A. The mediating effect of employees’ involvement on the relationship between Industry 4.0 and operational performance improvement. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2018:1-15. (In press)
  • Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Dhone NC. Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research. 2019:1-19. (In press)
  • Tortorella GL, Giglio R, van Dun DH. Industry 4.0 as a moderator on the relationship between lean and operational performance. In: 25th International Annual EurOMA Conference: To Serve, to Produce and to Servitize in the Era of Networks, Big Data and Analytics. Budapest, Hungary: University of Twente; 2018. pp. 1-10
  • Tortorella GL, Fettermann D. Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research. 2018;56(8):2975-2987
  • Rossini M, Costa F, Tortorella GL, Portioli-Staudacher A. The interrelation between Industry 4.0 and lean production: An empirical study on European manufacturers. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019;102(9-12):3963-3976
  • Pinho C, Mendes L. IT in lean-based manufacturing industries: Systematic literature review and research issues. International Journal of Production Research. 2017;55(24):7524-7540
  • Jiang G, Feng D, Zhu W. Toward efficient merchant shipbuilding based on the lean production methodology. Journal of Ship Production and Design. 2016;32(4):245-257
  • Beifert A, Gerlitz L, Prause G. Industry 4.0—For sustainable development of lean manufacturing companies in the shipbuilding sector. In: Kabashkin I, Yatskiv I, Prentkovskis O, editors, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 36. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 563-573
  • Jiang G, Feng D, Zhu W. Lean shipbuilding for project-based manufacturing. In: Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference. Nashville, USA: Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE); 2015. pp. 1730-1739
  • Buer S-V, Strandhagen JO, Chan FTS. The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research. 2018;56(8):2924-2940
  • Agrawal A, Schaefer S, Funke T. Incorporating Industry 4.0 in corporate strategy. In: Analyzing the Impacts of Industry 40 in Modern Business Environments. Hershey, USA: IGI Global; 2018. pp. 161-176
  • Ragulina YV, Shkodinsky SV, Mishchenko VV, Romanova YA. Scenarios of development of Industry 4.0 in the conditions of knowledge economy’s formation and their consequences for modern economic systems. In: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. pp. 227-234
  • Paranitharan KP, Babu R, Pandi PA, Jeyathilagar D. An empirical validation of integrated manufacturing business excellence model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2017;92(5-8):2569-2591
  • Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, Dubey R, Wamba SF, Childe SJ, Hazen B, et al. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research. 2017;70:308-317
  • Costa N, Patrício L, Morelli N, Magee CL. Bringing service design to manufacturing companies: Integrating PSS and service design approaches. Design Studies. 2018;55:112-145
  • Hmeshah K, Erbach N, Bronsart R. Impact of production requirements on high-quality ship product data models. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2016;230(3):508-522
  • Recamán RÁ. Navantia’s Shipyard 4.0 model overview. Cienc y Tecnol buques. 2018;11(22):77
  • Siggelkow N. Persuasion with case studies. The Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50(1):20-24
  • Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review. 1989;14(4):532
  • Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. SAGE: Thousand Oaks; 2003. p. 183
  • Navantia. Products and Services [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.navantia.es/en/products-and-services/
  • Gosling J, Naim MM. Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics. 2009;122(2):741-754
  • Navantia. Shipyard 4.0. 2018 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.navantia.es/en/navantia-4-0/shipyard-4-0/
  • Fraga LP. Enabling Technologies and Cyber-Physical Systems for Mission-Critical Scenarios. Universidade da Coruña; 2017
  • Moreno Nieto D, Casal López V, Molina SI. Large-format polymeric pellet-based additive manufacturing for the naval industry. Additive Manufacturing. 2018;23:79-85
  • Knezović N, Topić A. Wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM)—A new advance in manufacturing. In: Karabegović I, editor. New Technologies, Development and Application, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 65-71
  • Mehami J, Nawi M, Zhong RY. Smart automated guided vehicles for manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018;26:1077-1086
  • Bi Z, Cochran D. Big data analytics with applications. Journal of Management Analytics. 2014;1(4):249-265
  • Jun C, Lee JY, Kim BH. Cloud-based big data analytics platform using algorithm templates for the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2019;32(8):723-738
  • Majeed A, Lv J, Peng T. A framework for big data driven process analysis and optimization for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2019;25(2):308-321
  • Tao F, Qi Q , Wang L, Nee AYC. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering. 2019;5(4):653-661
  • Taylor SJE. Distributed simulation: State-of-the-art and potential for operational research. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019;273(1):1-19
  • Bao J, Zheng X, Zhang J, Ji X, Zhang J. Data-driven process planning for shipbuilding. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing AIEDAM. 2018;32(1):122-130
  • Lin C, He D, Huang X, Choo K-KR, Vasilakos AV. BSeIn: A blockchain-based secure mutual authentication with fine-grained access control system for industry 4.0. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2018;116(March):42-52
  • Chang SE, Chen Y-C, Lu M-F. Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019;144:1-11
  • Wang S, Wan J, Li D, Zhang C. Implementing smart factory of Industrie 4.0: An outlook. International Journal of Sensor Networks. 2016;12(1):3159805
  • Alcácer V, Cruz-Machado V. Scanning the Industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal. 2019;22(3):899-919
  • Rauch E, Seidenstricker S, Dallasega P, Hämmerl R. Collaborative cloud manufacturing: Design of business model innovations enabled by cyberphysical systems in distributed manufacturing systems. Journal of Engineering. 2016;2016:1-12
  • He H, Maple C, Watson T, Tiwari A, Mehnen J, Jin Y, et al. The security challenges in the IoT enabled cyber-physical systems and opportunities for evolutionary computing & other computational intelligence. In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). Vancouver, BC, Canada: IEEE; 2016. pp. 1015-1021
  • Piedrahita AFM, Gaur V, Giraldo J, Cardenas AA, Rueda SJ. Virtual incident response functions in control systems. Computer Networks. 2018;135:147-159
  • Tsuchiya A, Fraile F, Koshijima I, Ortiz A, Poler R. Software defined networking firewall for industry 4.0 manufacturing systems. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2018;11(2):318
  • Da Costa MB, Dos Santos LMAL, Schaefer JL, Baierle IC, Nara EOB. Industry 4.0 technologies basic network identification. Scientometrics. 2019;121(2):977-994
  • ur Rehman MH, Yaqoob I, Salah K, Imran M, Jayaraman PP, Perera C. The role of big data analytics in industrial Internet of Things. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019;99:247-259
  • Lopes Miranda Junior H, Albuquerque Bezerra NR, Soares Bezerra MJ, Rodrigues Farias Filho J. The internet of things sensors technologies and their applications for complex engineering projects: A digital construction site framework. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2017;14(4):567-576
  • Banks J, Carson JS II, Nelson BL, Nicol DM. Discrete-Event System Simulation. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, USA; 2010. p. 564
  • Mourtzis D, Doukas M, Bernidaki D. Simulation in manufacturing: Review and challenges. Procedia CIRP. 2014;25(C):213-229
  • Rodič B. Industry 4.0 and the new simulation modelling paradigm. Organizacija. 2017;50(3):193-207
  • Cavendish Group. The challenges of using new materials in shipbuilding [Internet]. Marine & Offshore Technology. 2017. Available from: http://www.marineoffshoretechnology.net/features-news/challenges-using-new-materials-shipbuilding
  • Ferraris S, Volpone LM. Aluminum alloys in third millennium shipbuilding: Materials, technologies, persepectives. In: 5th International Forum of Aluminum Ships. Tokyo, Japan. 2005. pp. 1-10
  • Koch PJ, van Amstel MK, Dębska P, Thormann MA, Tetzlaff AJ, Bøgh S, et al. A skill-based robot co-worker for industrial maintenance tasks. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017;11(June):83-90
  • Samsung. The Future of the Global Shipbuilding and Offshore Industries [Internet]. Samsung Heavy Industries. 2017. Available from: http://www.samsungshi.com/eng/deFaulT.aspx
  • Galindo PL, Morgado-Estévez A, Aparicio JL, Bárcena G, Soto-Núñez JA, Chavera P, et al. Development of a customized interface for a robotic welding application at navantia shipbuilding company. In: Third Iberian Robotics Conference (ROBOT 2017), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 694. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 43-52
  • Roldán JJ, Crespo E, Martín-Barrio A, Peña-Tapia E, Barrientos A. A training system for Industry 4.0 operators in complex assemblies based on virtual reality and process mining. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2019;59(May):305-316
  • Fraga-Lamas P, Fernandez-Carames TM, Blanco-Novoa O, Vilar-Montesinos MA. A review on industrial augmented reality systems for the Industry 4.0 shipyard. IEEE Access. 2018;6:13358-13375
  • Yao X, Zhou J, Lin Y, Li Y, Yu H, Liu Y. Smart manufacturing based on cyber-physical systems and beyond. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2019;30(8):2805-2817
  • Abramowski T. Application of artificial intelligence methods to preliminary design of ships and ship performance optimization. Naval Engineers Journal. 2013;125(3):101-112
  • Dopico M, Gomez A, De la Fuente D, García N, Rosillo R, Puche J. A vision of industry 4.0 from an artificial intelligence point of view. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI 2016—WORLDCOMP 2016). Las Vegas, USA: CSREA Press; 2016. pp. 407-413
  • Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 857
  • Havle CA, Ucler C. Enablers for Industry 4.0. In: 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT). Ankara, Turkey: IEEE; 2018. pp. 1-6
  • Agile Business Consortium. Chapter 10: MoSCoW Prioritisation [Internet]. DSDM Agile Project Framework Handbook. 2014. Available from: https://www.agilebusiness.org/page/ProjectFramework_10_MoSCoWPrioritisation
  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, USA: Harvard Analytic Technologies; 2002