Sistema de evaluación integrada para el pensamiento crítico en los estudios literarios

  1. María Vanesa Ledesma Urruti
  1. 1 Universidad de Cádiz
    info

    Universidad de Cádiz

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04mxxkb11

Journal:
Human Review: International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

ISSN: 2695-9623

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Monograph: "Communicating Current Teaching Approaches"

Volume: 11

Issue: 5

Type: Article

DOI: 10.37467/REVHUMAN.V11.3867 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Human Review: International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 0 (24-01-2024)
  • Dimensions Cited by: 0 (26-02-2024)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2022
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.116
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 410/555

CIRC

  • Human Sciences: C

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2022
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.0
  • Area: Arts and Humanities (all) Percentile: 5

Dimensions

(Data updated as of 26-02-2024)
  • Total citations: 0
  • Recent citations (2 years): 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the need for innovation in Critical Thinking assessment methods. In order to account for the diversity and interdisciplinarity of critical, argumentative and discursive competences in the field of literary studies, an Integrated Assessment System has been designed. This integrated system has helped innovative university professors create different assessment tools including rubrics both for oral and written tasks, self-evaluation questionnaires, peer evaluation sheets, and checklists, all of which are interrelated following assessment standard, key competence and minimum requirement criteria.

Bibliographic References

  • Bamber, V., Trowler, P., Sanders, M. & Knight, P. (2009). Enhancing Learning, Teaching, Assessment and Curriculum in Higher Education: Theory, Cases, Practices. Open University Press.
  • Birenbaum, M., Breuer, K., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., Dori, Y., Ridgway, J., Nickmans, G. (2006). A learning Integrated Assessment System. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.001
  • Biggs, J. (1998). “Assessment and classroom learning: A role for summative assessment?” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050106
  • Brown, G., Bull, J. & Pendlebury, M. (Eds.) (1997). Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. Routledge.
  • Cohen, L. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
  • Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 23-36). Routledge
  • Hartnell-Young, E. (2000). From Facilitator to Knowledge-Builder: A New Role for the Teacher of the Future. Centre for Applied Educational Research, 132, 159–163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35701-0_17
  • Paul, R.W. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 30, 34.
  • Paul, R.W., & Elder, L. (2007). A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking Competency Standards: Standards, Principles, Performance Indicators, and Outcomes with a Critical Thinking Master Rubric. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Paul, R.W. & Elder, L. (2020). Fact Over Fake: A Critical Thinker’s Guide to Media Bias and Political Propaganda. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  • Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B. & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 479-492.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903512883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903512883
  • Sánchez, S. & Zorzoli, N. (2019). Gestión de la evaluación integral: Aportes para una práctica áulica e institucional democratizadora. Noveduc.
  • Vega Moreno, É. (2022). Diseño de tareas para el aprendizaje y la evaluación de las competencias lingüísticas y el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico. IV Congreso Internacional de Innovación Docente e Investigación en Educación Superior: Retos de la actualización en la enseñanza de las Áreas de Conocimiento.
  • Vega Moreno, É. (en prensa). Diseño de tareas para el aprendizaje y la evaluación de las competencias lingüísticas y el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico. En A. B. Barragán Martín, M. Molero Jurado, Á. Martos Martínez, M. Simón Márquez, J. J. Gázquez Linares y M. C. Pérez-Fuentes (comps.), Innovación Docente e Investigación en Arte y Humanidades: Experiencias de cambio en la Metodología Docente. Editorial Dykinson.
  • Vigotsky, L. S. (1998). Obras Completas. Tomo 5. Progreso.
  • Vu, T. T. (2014). „Designing Integrative Assessment to Enhance Student Learning for Their Future. Australian Association for Research in Education, 1-14