DIFFERENT METHODS FOR PREPARATION TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN WILD AND CULTIVATED CIVET COFFEE USING NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY

  1. Deyla Prajna 1
  2. María Álvarez 2
  3. Marta Barea-Sepúlveda 2
  4. José Luis P. Calle 2
  5. Diding Suhandy 3
  6. Widiastuti Setyaningsih 4
  7. Miguel Palma 2
  1. 1 Department of Food and Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.
  2. 2 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), IVAGRO, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
  3. 3 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 35141, Indonesia.
  4. 4 Department of Food and Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
Actas:
XVII REUNIÓN DEL GRUPO REGIONAL ANDALUZ DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE QUÍMICA ANALÍTICA

Editorial: Comité Organizador GRASEQA 2022

ISBN: 978-84-09-44794-7

Año de publicación: 2022

Páginas: 104

Tipo: Aportación congreso

Resumen

Civet coffee is the world’s most expensive and rarest coffee bean. Indonesia was the first country to be identified as the origin of civet coffee. At first, civet coffee is produced spontaneously by collecting civets’ feces from coffee plantations near the forest. Due to the limited stock, the farmers began cultivating the civets to obtain safe supplies of civet coffee. Based on that, civet coffee is divided into two types, wild and cultivated civet coffee. A combination of spectrometry and chemometrics can be used to evaluate authenticity with high speed and precision. In this study, 7 samples from different regions were analyzed using NIR Spectroscopy with a variety of preparations, such as unroasted, roasted, unground, and ground. The spectroscopic data were combined with the unsupervised exploratory method, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principalcomponent analysis (PCA), as well as the supervised classification method, support vector machine and random forest. The HCA results showed a trend between roasted and unroasted; meanwhile, the PCA showed a trend based on coffee beans’ regions. Combining SVM with 5-fold cross validation successfully differentiated 87.50% in all samples, 71.43% in unground samples, 33.33% in unroasted-unground samples, and 100% in ground, roasted, roasted-unground, and roasted-ground samples. However, RF in combination with 5-Fold Cross Validation successfully differentiate 75% in all samples, 57.14% in unground samples, 85.71% in ground samples, 42.86% in unroasted samples, 66.67% in unroasted-unground samples, and 100% in all roasted, roasted-unground, unroasted-ground, and roasted-ground samples. In general, roasting and groundingsamples before analysis can improve the accuracy to differentiate wild and cultivated civet coffee using NIR Spectroscopy.