Water/marine Zero Pollution Outlook

  1. MACIAS, MOY Diego
  2. STIPS, Adolf
  3. GRIZZETTI, Bruna
  4. ALOE, Alberto
  5. BISSELINK, Bernard
  6. DE MEIJ, Alexander
  7. DE, ROO Arie
  8. DUTIEL, Olaf
  9. FERREIRA, Nuno
  10. GARCIA, GORRIZ Elisa
  11. GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, Daniel
  12. HRISTOV, Jordan
  13. MILADINOVA-MARINOVA, Svetla
  14. PÄRN, Ove
  15. PIRODDI, Chiara
  16. PISONI, Enrico
  17. PISTOCCHI, Alberto
  18. POLIMENE, Luca
  19. SERPETTI, Natalia
  20. THOMA, Cristopher
  21. UDIAS, MOINELO Angel
  22. VIGIAK, Olga
  23. WEISS, Franz
  24. WILSON, Julian
  25. ZANNI, Michaela
Revista:
EUR. Scientific and technical research series

ISSN: 1831-9424

ISBN: 978-92-76-59109-2

Año de publicación: 2022

Páginas: 1-65

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.2760/681817 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: EUR. Scientific and technical research series

Resumen

Forward looking analyses are needed in order to anticipate which policy/management options can deliver the very ambitious objectives of the Zero Pollution (ZP) action plan. Integrated and sophisticated numerical modelling tools are useful to generate future scenarios and ‘what if’ analysis as they allow the virtual manipulation of the anthropogenic pressures on ecological systems.JRC has been developing an integrated modelling framework covering the inland and marine waters of the EU, the Marine Modelling Framework (MMF) that follows the principle of the Digital Twins (DT) and that allow to test the impacts of diverse management strategies on the status of freshwater and marine ecosystems through the EU. In the present report, the JRC-DT for water and marine ecosystems is used to test how different policy options can help achieve some of the ZP objectives.From the six top ambitions of the ZP action plan, two are particularly relevant for the water/marine environments. First, the ZP action plan states that it aims at ‘improving water quality by reducing waste’ and in particular, it mentions the (reduction of) ‘plastic litter at sea (by 50%)’. The second relevant ambition refers to ‘improving soil quality by reducing nutrient losses and chemical pesticides’ use by 50%’, which does not only impact soil quality but also the receiving waters (rivers, lakes and seas).