Análisis bibliométrico de la investigación española sobre Comunicación para el Desarrollo y el Cambio Social (2014-2020): ¿temáticas emergentes o campo en implosión?

  1. Marí Sáez, Víctor 2
  2. Salomón, Yelina Piedra 1
  3. Díaz, José Miguel Domínguez 1
  4. Castro, Gonzalo Ceballos 2
  1. 1 Universidad de La Habana, Cuba
  2. 2 Universidad de Cádiz, España
Journal:
Transinformação

ISSN: 2318-0889,  0103-3786

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 35

Issue: e226852

Pages: 1-18

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1590/2318-0889202335E226852 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Transinformação

Abstract

In recent years the field of Communication for Development and Social Change has been bibliometrically analyzed to identify the characteristic features of its scientific production. However, the previous studies have not incorporated the specific methodologies of bibliometrics and documentary research. This article fills that gap, by analyzing the keywords co-occurrence of CDCS scientific domain. The joint appearance of two or more representative words in fields such as article titles, abstracts, keywords, or free text is studied. Subsequently, the analysis is represented in word maps and networks, where the groups of words and the relationships between them are identified. The research questions of this work are the following: what are the texts of the sample, from which to carry out the indicated bibliometric analysis? What keywords are used to carry out the co-occurrence analysis and the graphic representation of this scientific domain? Given the trends identified, are we facing an emerging field or a field in the process of imploding? The conclusions point to the second term of this dilemma. We are witnessing an uncreative destruction of the field, to the extent that the fragile theoretical foundations from which this incipient field in Spanish communication research was beginning to rise have been demolished.

Bibliographic References

  • Acosta A., (2013)
  • Araújo C. A. A., (2018), LOGEION: Filosofia da informação, 4, pp. 31, 10.21728/logeion.2018v4n2.p31-55
  • Araújo C. A. A., (2019), Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7, pp. 6
  • Araújo C. A. A., (2019), Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 15, pp. 137
  • Arencibia-Jorge R., (2020), Palabra Clave, 10
  • Barranquero A., (2015), Signo y Pensamiento, 34, pp. 30
  • Caffarel-Serra C., (2017), El Profesional de la Información, 2, pp. 218, 10.3145/epi.2017.mar.08
  • Callon M., (1983), Social Science Information, 22, pp. 191, 10.1177/053901883022002003
  • Callon M., (1986)
  • Callon M., (1995)
  • Castillo A., (2010), Comunicación y Sociedad, 23, pp. 289
  • Chaparro M., (2013), Telos: Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, 94, pp. 31
  • Díaz-Campo J., (2016), Transinformaçao, 28, pp. 337, 10.1590/2318-08892016000300008
  • Díaz-Campo J., (2017), Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 23, pp. 759, 10.5209/ESMP.58014
  • Enghel F., (2013), Communication, development and social change: Future alternatives, pp. 119
  • Fernández-Quijada D., (2013), Comunicar, 41, pp. 15
  • Fernández VIso A., (2012), CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 17, pp. 41, 10.5209/rev_CIYC.2012.v17.39257
  • Fernández D., (2013), Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 36, pp. 1
  • Gálvez C., (2018), Transinfomaçao, 30, pp. 277, 10.1590/2318-08892018000300001
  • Gálvez C., (2019), Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 77, pp. 187, 10.5209/CLAC.63283
  • García-Marco F., (2020), Profesional de la Información, 29
  • Glänzel W., (2012), Profesional de la Información, 21, pp. 194, 10.3145/epi.2012.mar.11
  • Goyanes M., (2015), Observatorio, 9, pp. 85
  • Gumucio A., (2006)
  • Hernández-Cruz N., (2021), Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 1, pp. 1, 10.47909/ijsmc.88
  • Jiménez M., (2016), pp. 16
  • Jones D. E., (1998), ZER: Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 3
  • Latouche S., (2008)
  • Marí V., (2015), Cuadernos.info, 37, pp. 201, 10.7764/cdi.37.828
  • Marí V., (2013), Commons: Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 2, pp. 40
  • Marí V., (2020), Development in Practice, 30, pp. 862, 10.1080/09614524.2020.1755232
  • Marí V., (2021), Arbor, 197, pp. a615, 10.3989/arbor.2021.801005
  • Marí-Sáez V., (2021), TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 19, pp. 307, 10.31269/triplec.v19i2.1258
  • Martínez-Nicolás M., (2008), La investigación sobre Comunicación en España. Evolución y retos actuales, pp. 13
  • Martínez-Nicolás M., (2009), Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 64, pp. 1, 10.4185/10.4185/RLCS-64-2009-800-01-14
  • Martínez-Nicolás M., (2011), Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 66, pp. 101
  • Olmeda-Gómez C., (2017), Scientometrics, 113, pp. 195, 10.1007/s11192-017-2486-8
  • Piedra Y., (2018), Revista Brasileña de Educación y Ciencias de la Información, 5, pp. 3
  • Quarry W., (2009)
  • Rendón-Rojas M. A., (2020), Escuela de pensamiento iberoamericana de Ciencia de la Información Documental. A manera de conclusión, pp. 305
  • Rendón-Rojas M. A., (2020)
  • Rist G., (2002)
  • Rodríguez E., (2018), Comunicación y Sociedad, 31, pp. 229
  • Saperas E., (2017)
  • Schumpeter J., (1942), The process of creative destruction, pp. 79
  • Servaes J., (2000), Temas y Problemas de Comunicación, 8, pp. 7
  • Servaes J., (2003)
  • Small H., (2003), Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, pp. 394, 10.1002/asi.10225
  • Soriano J., (2008), pp. 1
  • Tacchi J., (2013)
  • Unceta K., (2009), Carta Latinoamericana, 7, pp. 1
  • Van Eck N. J., (2007), International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15, pp. 625, 10.1142/S0218488507004911
  • Van Eck N. J., (2010), Scientometrics, 84, pp. 523, 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • Vega-Almeida R.L., (2021), Iberoamerican: Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 1, pp. 1
  • Williams R., (1977)